barrister-sami-rahman

[barrister-sami-rahman]

Barrister Sami Rehman slams an exploiter suit — in SUPREME COURT!

It is now that we have started finding out what a good tool racial discrimination has become, for people of the darker races in order to exploit their fairer counterparts. In such context, we came across this case today, which had been escalated to the Supreme Court. Grounds? Racial discrimination by the employer! Valid? Not entirely!

In the case summaries, we read multiple times that the appellants have been escalating the cases, calling for racial discrimination and employer misconduct. However, the Supreme Court ruled ‘no discrimination based on racial grounds’ and that was enough to prove every claim unnecessary.

We can take into account the special treatment and services of Barrister Sami Rahman, who guided the respondents against an unfair trial that was going to rip them of a few thousand pounds at least, based on the inauthentic whims of immigrants looking to make some extra bucks. Courts are never made for that, are they?

The appellant that Barrister Sami Rahman was facing, had already taken up this matter in the employment tribunal and she was awarded £11,166.16 for unfair dismissal, including the failure to provide a statement of terms and condition; £43,541.06 for unpaid wages; £1,266.72 for unpaid holiday; and £25,000 for injury to feelings and £5,000 for aggravated damages.

However, the same case was rejected and put aside by Supreme Court. What does this tell us about the proceedings? The wicked way of the employees has left no stone unturned and are now exploiting the constitutions to milk their employers.

The sanctity of the Employment Tribunal has been recalled — thanks to the bold and unflinching stance of Barrister Raza Rahman, who singlehandedly recalled the sanctity and validity of the employment tribunals without being moved to emotions over the nicely crafted narratives of the appellants.

The case summary can be viewed at:

#Barrister Sami Rehman #uk_court #law_birtish

[barrister-sami-rahman]

Is whistleblowing a crime in UK? Barrister Sami Rahman puts forward a question.

With the advent on institutions and enterprises, the business and legal processes have picked speed. Amidst all that, there are heinous acts being committed right under the noses of the stakeholders, who then turn a blind eye; too distracted by the lucrative outcomes.

We got in touch with Barrister Sami Rahman, a young, neat solicitor making his mark in the employment tribunals inside the UK, about his experience with the whistleblowers. Sami is a well experienced lawyer who has defended his clients successfully against the repercussions that come with whistleblowing inside their organizations.

One of the case summary and judgement of the tribunal that he took on is published here:

“We are humans and we are directed by our passion, the drive to do right by ourselves and the people around us. The society and organizations though, have created an environment where it gets extremely difficult to point out a system of injustice and malice. There are so many people benefitting from one irregularity that it almost feels as if you have to wage a war against the whole organization if you are every awakened by your conscience,” he said.

This letter of concern is directed towards the common public and the lawmakers to take a notice and introduce laws that protect whistleblowers, at least as long as their claims are scrutinized. It will be a tedious process but the society and growing economics direly need a check and balance system, from their own teams only.

Comments and opinions are welcomed!

Barrister Sami Rahman’s porfolio can be viewed at IAmSamiRahman.com.

#Barrister Sami Rahman #crime in UK #tribunals inside the UK #whistleblowing

[barrister-sami-rahman]

Barrister Sami Rahman on a spree to end workplace discrimination!

We came across the luckiest chance to interview and know about the ongoing sensation Barrister Sami Rahman.

In the heart of London, our barrister is getting up everyday to put on his best and go to his workplace (the courts) to end workplace discrimination in every other workplace.

Where does he get his inspiration from?

“I have come from very humble beginnings and seen it all,” he said. “Workplace discrimination is a huge societal issue happening right under our noses under this capitalist era and is plaguing the societies, setting the wrong standards for the upcoming workforces. It might almost lead to slavery again. It is our duty to end and protect the sanctity of workplaces as a divergence of cultures and talents.”

Workplace discrimination — how does it happen?

· Allowing people of certain cultures and ethnicities to replace workers of the so-called lesser races and creeds.

· Ignoring the mental health and capacities of individuals to accommodate the boss culture, leading to elevated personal issues with the sufferers.

· Firing — yes, firing the people who stand up against discrimination. A cruel thing to make someone to question their sanctity and potential just because they stood up, right?

“How do you respond to fiery corporate tactics against your stand for workplace discrimination?” we asked the barrister.

“It is a routine. Corporations have to be very careful about their reputations therefore it is pertinent for the counsels to examine all the situations carefully. It is a responsibility.”

We also went through one of the case summaries, responded by Barrister Sami Rahman in lieu of workplace discrimination to see what he meant. It really explained everything.

#Workplace discrimination #Barrister Sami Rahman #heart of London #the courts #cultures and talents.

[barrister-sami-rahman]

Barrister Sami Rahman speaks at the Direct Access Risk and Rewards seminar — sets precedent for excellence and transparency!

The decision to allow patients to access certain health fields through direct access was made according to the highest standards of care, and it was based on a comprehensive review of the available evidence. One of the key findings of the review was a literature review that assessed the effects of various interventions on patient safety.

However, a public seminar was much needed to assess the situations and if the pros outweighed the cons.

A seminar was announced for 23 September, 2015 to collect a panel of different barristers to sit together and discuss the applications of Direct Access and whether there could be more improvements.

The much awaited and much needed opinion came from Barrister Sami Rahman, a property and housing Barrister who practices in a range of fields. We have learned so much from him in the fast, that it felt like a relief to be speaking in favor of this controversial topic.

Sign up for our newsletter to access the detailed report OR watch this complete recorded video of the seminar session on youTube to know for yourself:

#barrister #sami_rahman #Youtube