Tumgik
#major macdonald's wig
Text
OUTLANDER: ON CHANGING THE PAST, PART 1: Adso steals a wig and "the Devil is in the details"
Tumblr media
I confess, time travel dilemmas have always confused me. And in he case of Outlander, such dilemmas became even more confusing when the show differed slightly from the book series. Especially regarding the details of Jamie and Claire's obituary/ death notice, and the time line for the Big House fire, Mandy's birth, and the return of Roger, Bree and the kids to the 20th century.
Tumblr media
In the show at least, the question about whether Roger and Bree changed Jamie and Claire's fate in the past was quickly settled in the affirmative. In episode 703, Roger explains to Bree that the match sticks she created in the past, "caused a fire" in December that her parents survived. So there was nothing left of the Big House to burn down and kill them the following January.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
However, things were not so simple in the book series.
WARNING: Outlander book series spoilers ahead.
Tumblr media
1776 VERSUS 1775: Divergence in the book series' and show's time lines
I realized part of my confusion with this plot was that the show and the book series had two slightly different time lines.
THE BOOK SERIES TIME LINE. In the official Outlander book series time line, Mandy was born in April 1776, and Roger, Bree & the kids returned to the 20th century on November 1, 1776. Furthermore, in An Echo in the Bone (ECHO), Jamie's letter to Bree announcing that he and Claire survived the fire was dated December 31, 1776. Consequently, there was no doubt in the book series (at least initially) that all these events happened in 1776.
Tumblr media
THE SHOW'S TIME LINE. In episode 703, Jamie's same letter to Bree is dated April 1776. So in the show--unlike in the book series-- the Big House fire must have happened the previous December 1775.
Tumblr media
Consequently, in the show, Mandy must have been born in 1775 and Bree, Roger & the kids must have returned to the 20th century in 1775.
Tumblr media
The Show's "Obituary" vs. the Book Serie's "Death Notice"
THE "OBITUARY." In the show, a full obituary was written for the Frasers. But in the copy of it that Roger and Bree found in the future, the last digit of the year in which the obituary was published was blurred. The date of the obituary was therefore 21 January, 177X, and the obituary said that they died "On Sabbath evening last." Without the exact year, Roger & Bree couldn't extrapolate the exact date on which "Sabbath evening last" fell. As we shall see, in some ways, this made the plot simpler.
Tumblr media
THE "DEATH NOTICE." In the book series, a simple death notice was written for the Frasers, rather than a full obituary. In Drums of Autumn (DOA), Diana Gabaldon tells us that the death notice was published in the Feb. 13, 1776 issue of a NC colonial newspaper, and the date of the fire was "January 21 last":
Tumblr media
As we shall see under the cut of this post, it turns out that knowing the year when the Frasers' deaths reportedly occurred makes a lot of difference--at least in the book series.
Tumblr media
ABOSAA: Adso and the January 21st Fire
Given the exact date of their deaths in the death notice in DOA, by the time of A Breath of Snow and Ashes (ABOSAA), the family assumed that Jamie and Claire would die in a fire in the Big House on January 21,1776.
Consequently on Jan. 21st they all gathered in Brianna and Roger's cabin (with Bree & Roger, who were still living on Fraser's Ridge, according to the book series' time line), to avoid being in the Big House that evening.
Then a mishap with Rollo caused the visiting Major MacDonald to fall in the snow. Claire put his wet wig in the pantry behind the phosphorous to keep Adso from getting it, to no avail, as she discovered when she later went to get the Major's wig for him:
“Oh, your wig! Just a moment, Major—I’ll fetch it.” I rushed out and round to the pantry—just in time to hear a crash as something fell inside. I jerked open the door, left ajar from my last visit, and Adso streaked past me, the Major’s wig in his mouth. Inside, the lean-to was in brilliant blue flames. --Diana Gabaldon (2005, p. 907)
Tumblr media
Further damage of the pantry and the cabin by fire was prevented by Major MacDonald sacrificing his wet coat.
That's how Jamie and Claire "survived" January 21st in ABOSAA. Although DG never explicitly states it (at least that I recall), I always assumed that at least initially everyone thought the newspaper got it wrong about which house caught fire. And perhaps, they also assumed that because they had been forewarned about the fire, Adso's little escapade didn't end with the cabin burning down.
Regardless, Jamie and Claire must have thought they were finally safe from a fiery death--until Dec. 21, 1776, when the Big House caught fire.
[See more below the cut about why the death notice in the book series reported that the fire happened in January and not December, and why knowing the year the death notice was printed in the book series helped Bree and Roger realize they did in fact change the past after all.]
The Devil is in the Details
Tumblr media
In ABOSAA Epilogue II: The Devil is in the Details, we learn that the original death notice that had been submitted to the newspaper reported that the fire had happened in December, but Sampson, the "new printer's devil" (i.e., apprentice) didn't have slugs in the right font for December and so he changed the date to January.
“What’s this, then?” Amos Crupp squinted at the page laid out in the bed of the press, reading it backward with the ease of long experience. “It is with grief that the news is received of the deaths by fire …  Where’d that come from?” “Note from a subscriber,” said Sampson, his new printer’s devil, shrugging as he inked the plate. “Good for a bit of filler, there, I thought. [...] “Hmph. I s’pose. Very old news, though,” Crupp said, glancing at the date. “January?” “Well, no,” the devil admitted....“ ’Twas December, by the notice. But I’d set the page in Baskerville twelve-point, and the slugs for November and December are missing in that font. Not room to do it in separate letters, and not worth the labor to reset the whole page.” --Diana Gabaldon (2005, p. 980)
At first glance, it appears that DG had implied in ABOSAA that Roger and Bree didn't change history--that the newspaper had just printed the wrong month because of missing slugs in the proper font.
So the mystery about the wrong month in the death notice was solved--or was it?
Tumblr media
Maybe More Was Afoot Than the "Printer's Devil's" Mistake
One might think that the books and show diverge here. In the show, the explanation for the erroneous month in the obituary is rather straight forward. It's because Roger and Bree had changed history. But in ABOSAA, we have a logical explanation for the incorrect month in the death notice--or do we?
Because in ECHO, Roger and Bree discover upon their return to the 20th century that one thing has changed in the death notice--the date. Although, they don't say which part of the date (the month or the year or both), at the very least, the YEAR had to have changed.
in ABOSAA, the Big House burned on Dec. 21, 1776. Therefore, news of the fire couldn't have appeared in the Feb. 13, 1776 newspaper like it originally did--because that would have meant the death notice was published slightly more than 10 months BEFORE the fire. Consequently, in ECHO, after they returned to the 20th century, Roger and Bree must have noticed that the YEAR that the newspaper printed the death notice had changed to 1777.
Confused? All I have to say is: Where is "Back to the Future's" Doc Brown when you need him? 🤷🏻‍♀️
Tumblr media
In ECHO, Claire realizes that something is amiss with time when she talks to Tom Christie in Wilmington in April 1977. Tom told Claire that he had heard about the fire in "late January" from "a man named McCreary" who "had just come down from the mountain." Tom then asked Claire:
"Was there a fire?" “Well, yes, there was,” I said slowly, wondering whether—and how much—to tell him of the truth of that. Very little, in a public place, I decided. “Maybe it was Mr. McCreary, then, who placed the notice of the fire in the newspaper—but he can’t have.” The original notice had appeared in 1776, Roger had said—nearly a year before the fire. [emphasis added] “I placed it,” Christie said. Now it was my turn to blink. “You what? When?” I took a good-sized mouthful of whisky, feeling that I needed it more than ever. “Directly I heard of it. Or—well, no,” he corrected. “A few days thereafter. I … was very much distressed at the news,” he added, lowering his eyes and looking away from me for the first time since we’d sat down. --Diana Gabaldon (2009, p. 189)
Tumblr media
So Claire knows something is wrong with the time line. The Big House burned down on Dec. 21, 1776 but the original notice about the house burning was printed on Feb. 13, 1776--months BEFORE it happened.
Bree and Roger must somehow have changed Claire's and Jamie's fates after all--in BOTH the book series and in the show.
Tumblr media
This is likely why the show runners chose to simplify the plot by obscuring the the last digit of the year of the obituary's publication. By making the year vague, the audience does not have to work through all these steps that book readers have had to do over the years to reconcile the date of the death notice being about 10 months before the Big House burned down.
Still, that isn't the end of the questions about changing the past in the Outlander universe. Roger raises more religious questions in both the book series and the show. Part 2 of this two-part essay series will explore those questions.
________________ IMAGE SOURCES: 1) All Outlander gifs are mine--they were made from Starz Outlander episode 703, as was the screencap of Jamie's April 1776 letter. 2) Winona Ryder confused gif source (before edits). 3)* Jamie's December 31, 1776 letter was a direct quote from ECHO, reformatted to replicate a handwritten letter. 4) the obituary screenshot source (before edits); "Sabbath evening last" inset source (before edits); "21 January, 177X" inset composite sources: 01 + 02 (before edits). 5)* The Feb. 13, 1776 death notice was a direct quote from DOA reformatted to replicate a colonial newspaper death notice. 6) The Adso manipulated image was made from these sources (before edits): 01 + 02 + 03. 7) The illustration of an 18th century printing shop source. 8) The Back to the Future Doc Brown video source for gif (before edits). 9) The Claire and Tom Christie screenshot source (before edits).
24 notes · View notes
gotham-ruaidh · 4 years
Note
Talk to me about Jaime killing Knox. I don’t know how I feel about it. Remind me, does he kill someone like that in the books? I haven’t read them in a while. And that line “forgive me for not giving you a soldiers death”. Was that in the books? At the same time it DID remind me of how and why he killed Dougal.
This plotline is *not* in The Fiery Cross - though there is a redcoat, Major MacDonald, who Jamie gets to know fairly well (later on - he stays with the Frasers a few times and Adso develops a particularly strong affinity for his wig).
Why did Jamie kill Knox?
Well - remember the last time he let a redcoat live, and then the redcoat proceeded to wreak utter havoc on him and his family?
That would be the time he left an unconscious - yet alive - Black Jack Randall on the floor of his office at Fort William.
So - I completely understand why Jamie did what he did. Consider it this way - he was honest with the man, and in so doing, reclaimed his identity as Red Jamie again. Red Jamie, the Jacobite, who swears oaths to nobody, no king - only to his family.
I was particularly impressed by how cleverly he covered all of his tracks, too. (AND THE FACT THAT IT’S HOW HE FOUND ADSO WAS AMAZING OK)
“Forgive me for not giving you a soldier’s death” -- a soldier’s death is to be shot (that was the fate of Rupert, after Culloden, and would have been Jamie’s fate, had Hal Grey not intervened). Knox didn’t give a soldier’s death to the Regulator he killed in the jail...so Jamie returns the favor, so to speak. 
158 notes · View notes
picturethefrasers · 5 years
Note
I would love to see a drawing of Major MacDonald and Adso!
Hello, and thank you for your request! Adso is such a great ancillary character & an important part of life on Fraser’s Ridge. Major MacDonald’s wig provides endless fascination for that cat. This is an early contribution to @picturethefrasers ...Adso reaching for the Major’s wig.
Tumblr media
49 notes · View notes
Text
Okay, is it too much to hope for that they made Sam a better wig for Season 4 or is it just this photo? 🤔
Tumblr media
Sorry, not sorry. I just want him to look like he brushes his hair every once in a while. 😬
If they haven’t improved his wig I might just hope that Adso 🐈 steals Jamie’s wig instead of Major MacDonald’s. 😉
Tumblr media
via source
45 notes · View notes
Text
Read A Breath of Snow and Ashes (Outlander #6)(4) online free by Diana Gabaldon
A Breath of Snow and Ashes (Outlander #6)(4) Author: Diana Gabaldon
“I beg your pardon?” I had missed something MacDonald was saying. He bent politely closer to repeat it, then jerked suddenly, eyes bulging.
“Frigging cat!”
Adso, who had been doing a splendid imitation of a limp dishcloth, had sprung bolt upright in the Major’s lap, eyes glowing and tail like a bottlebrush, hissing like a teakettle as he flexed his claws hard into the Major’s legs. I hadn’t time to react before he had leapt over MacDonald’s shoulder and swarmed through the open surgery window behind him, ripping the Major’s ruffle and knocking his wig askew in the process.
MacDonald was cursing freely, but I hadn’t attention to spare for him. Rollo was coming up the path toward the house, wolflike and sinister in the gloaming, but acting so oddly that I was standing before conscious thought could bring me to my feet.
The dog would run a few steps toward the house, circle once or twice as though unable to decide what to do next, then run back into the wood, turn, and run again toward the house, all the while whining with agitation, tail low and wavering.
“Jesus H. Roosevelt Christ,” I said. “Bloody Timmy’s in the well!” I flew down the steps and ran for the path, barely registering the Major’s startled oath behind me.
I found Ian a few hundred yards down the path, conscious, but groggy. He was sitting on the ground, eyes closed and both hands holding... Source from: Read A Breath of Snow and Ashes (Outlander #6)(4) online free by Diana Gabaldon
0 notes
gotham-ruaidh · 5 years
Text
Gotham’s Season 5 Wishlist
Jamie’s snakebite
Jocasta’s wedding (TO MURTAGH?!!?!?!)
Zugunruhe
The sperms
Brianna and Jamie getting closer
Grand-da’s got balls?
Germain
Claire finally has her surgery!
We meet the Beardsleys
Adso
Murtagh’s storyline
Roger singing + playing guitar
Adso vs. Major Macdonald’s wig (my otp)
White sow badassery
Watch while I take ye
“If my last words are not, “I love you,” ye’ll ken it was because I didna have time”
Philip Wylie
Young Ian returns
Jamie and Roger becoming father and son
Adso
Clarence
Lord John randomly returning
Jamie and Claire having all of the domestic bliss they should have always had, OK?
132 notes · View notes
picturethefrasers · 7 years
Note
So here for any and all fan art y'all share! And, selfishly, do humbly request a depiction of the epic saga of Adso vs. Major MacDonald's wig. ;)
Tumblr media
“Adso, Ready to Pounce”
Thanks to @callmeder for the Adso/Major MacDonald prompt! I love that wee cheetie & it cracks me up when he stalks the major’s wig! - Hope you like it! Mod Brandee
112 notes · View notes