#leading advocate of criminal-justice reform

[jugaflugg]

The Shigaraki Problem*

A [long] essay on how Shigaraki could be saved.

I've had a lot of trouble reconciling various moral and practical issues in the desirable outcome for many of the "Villains" in My Hero Academia. Even the internal debate on labelling them Villains is a point of contention for me. I think being reflective on the issues that are represented in art can be good for personal development; to be challenged is to grow.

I mean, in this essay, to put real-world practicality aside and focus on the circumstances of the text. That is to say that the outcomes are not necessarily in-line with what I expect of real-world establishments, since the situations are markedly different. For example, I would personally advocate for prison abolition in an ideal world, but the constraints of the immediate situation in the story don't particularly enable this, in my opinion.

In any case, the issue can mostly be reduced to certain criteria requiring fulfilment, and the fact that they may seem contradictory to each other:

1. The Villains wish to be free and able to do as they please. 2. [Some] members of Hero society wish to "save" the Villains. 3. The criminal justice system wishes to incarcerate and/or punish the Villains. 4. Society, at large, must be safe for all to live in.

For now, let's use Mr. Compress as an example. At present, he is imprisoned for his criminal activity. He wishes to be free and, presumably, be with his friends (or found family, if you like). Any reform that is possible for him would rely on educating him on why his acts were harmful and empowering him to live a full life. Imprisonment, of course, impinges on that. However, for someone who has committed violent acts, how can one be sure that they will not commit violent acts again?

Therein lies the problem.

Shigaraki's case is similar: he wishes to be free and, at present, to kill practically everyone. Even if he could be convinced that this is not morally right, his dangerous history and capabilities make him a continued threat - at least, that is how incarceration of him would be justified in-universe.

So, how do we save Shigaraki? I have a few theories on what may happen next.

Theory One: It's All AFO's Fault

Shigaraki, at this stage in the story, must be aware of the control AFO had over his life. The resentment that he has expressed towards his former mentor, the man he even considered a father-figure at one point, has grown in recent chapters. With AFO's demise, there is little revenge Shigaraki can seek on him, except to destroy the legacy he intended to leave.

Many have suggested that AFO's role in Shigaraki's radicalisation took place earlier than we were led to believe: AFO gave Shigaraki his Decay quirk. This would, of course, suggest that he manipulated the young Tenko into believing that his quirk was intended for destruction, to meet his wish to destroy. Should this idea be shattered, perhaps Shigaraki may re-examine how he came to be as he is. Whilst I don't advocate self-destruction, any remorse Shigaraki may feel as a result of such a revelation might lead him down that path.

Theory Two: It's All AFO's Fault, Again

Much like the previous theory, this relies on the idea that AFO's involvement in Tenko's trauma runs deeper than depicted. In this theory, the idea of AFO giving him the Decay quirk is optional. However, what happened afterwards was all AFO.

Consider, for a moment, Camie's quirk, which allows her to create illusions. If AFO has any similar ability, or multiple similar abilities, he may have been able to convince Tenko of his abandonment whilst, in reality, he may have been able to seek help. The people who ignored Tenko on the street may have been illusions, may have been brainwashed. Radicalising a young child to that extent could be the product of meticulous planning, far more insidious and, most importantly, originating from AFO.

Self-destruction is not the only response to this, of course. Shigaraki may decide to give in, entirely. Perhaps he will give up his quirk and surrender to the current authorities. Or...

Theory Three: Merge

Perhaps all of the above is true. Perhaps none of it is. But here's the thing: Shigaraki doesn't necessarily want to die, and he doesn't necessarily want to spend the rest of his days in a jail cell. So here's what I'm thinking: he needs to abandon the corporeal realm.

That sounds dramatic, I know, but think about it like this: he doesn't want to live in that world, so what if he instead chose to live within the vestige realm?

Imagine AFO and OFA merge and Shigaraki ends up inside of OFA, forever, as a vestige. If the vestiges from OFA can end up inside of his copy of AFO, surely the opposite may be possible, too? I suppose it would mean he'd would be permanently inside of Izuku's mind, but perhaps one could think of it as paralleling Red Skull on Vormir in Avengers: Infinity War. If OFA ever moved beyond Izuku, Shigaraki would be the warden of the power.

Theories aside, the finale of this entire piece will be interesting to see. Any outcome that is both morally sound and beneficial to all characters is of interest to me, since I have struggled to put the pieces together in a way that satisfy the aforementioned criteria. I am left to wonder what it is that Izuku will do, or say, to end this. I can only hope that it will satisfy the curiosity of its many readers.

*I feel I must state, explicitly, that Shigaraki himself isn't the problem; I am looking for a solution to his situation. I suppose it's comparable to describing a complex equation as a "mathematical problem".

#my hero academia #deku #izuku midoriya #tenko shimura #tomura shigaraki #shigaraki #theory #analysis #all for one #one for all #how will this amazing tale end?

[dontmeantobepoliticalbut]

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R), a 2024 GOP presidential candidate, said he would not federally decriminalize marijuana if elected to the White House—arguing that cannabis use hurts the workforce, inhibits productivity and could even lead to death if contaminated.

At a campaign event in South Carolina on Thursday, a person who said they were representing wounded veterans asked DeSantis if he would “please” decriminalize cannabis as President.

The Governor responded directly: “I don’t think we would do that.”

He then talked about Florida’s medical marijuana program that was enacted by voters, saying veterans are “actually allowed access” to cannabis under that model. But he said the issue is “controversial because obviously there’s some people that abuse it and are using it recreationally.”

DeSantis rattled off a number of concerns he has about cannabis use, starting with the potency of marijuana that “they’re putting on the street” and his understanding that illicit products are being laced with other drugs such as fentanyl.

“If you do something with that, it could be goodnight right then and there,” he said. “You could die just by ingesting that, so I think that that’s problematic.”

Experts and advocates have questioned law enforcement claims about the prevalence of fentanyl-tainted cannabis in the illicit market. In any case, DeSantis also didn’t acknowledge that creating a regulatory regime where marijuana is subject to testing before consumers can buy it could mitigate instances of contamination.

“I think that we have we have too many people using using drugs in this country right now. I think it hurts our workforce readiness. I think it hurts people’s ability to prosper in life,” he said, adding that people he knew in high school who used marijuana “suffered.”

“All their activities, all their grades and everything like that—so particularly for the youth, I just think we have to be united,” the candidate said. He also plugged a Florida program overseen by his wife that involves sending athletes to schools to warn students about “the stakes of using some of these drugs nowadays, and this is not something you want to mess around with.”

He went on to say that, in order to address the fentanyl issue, “you’ve got to fight the supply, put the dealers in prison for a long time—but you also got to work on demand, and you also have to work on treatment for people once they get addicted.”

DeSantis’s opposition to legalization isn’t anything new, though this is the first time he’s addressed the issue since launching his presidential campaign.

Former Florida Agriculture Commissioner Nikki Fried, a cannabis reform advocate who now chairs the state Democratic Party after unsuccessfully running for her party’s gubernatorial nomination last year, reacted to the DeSantis’s comments by pointing out that polling shows widespread public support for legalization and decriminalization among Floridians.

“Ron doesn’t care what the people want,” she said.

Several Republican 2024 presidential hopefuls have addressed drug policy issues in recent weeks.

For example, former President Donald Trump seemed confused during a recent interview when he was confronted with the fact that his proposed plan to impose the death penalty on drug traffickers would have condemned a woman he pardoned and promoted as an example of a key criminal justice reform achievement during his administration.

At a CNN town hall event this month, former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) said that he would “end” the war on drugs if elected, emphasizing the need for a treatment-based approach to people experiencing addiction—while at the same time maintaining that he’d seek to increase enforcement against those who sell drugs.

#us politics #news #marijuana moment #medical marijuana #legalize marijuana #medical marijuanna #legalize cannabis #recreational cannabis #decriminalize cannabis #medical cannabis #republicans #conservatives #tweet #gov. ron desantis #nikki fried #chris christie #donald trump #2023 #2024 elections #2024 presidential race #2024 republican primaries #YouTube #videos #decriminalize drugs #decriminalization

[newstfionline]

Wednesday, May 31, 2023

Thousands evacuate from Nova Scotia wildfires (AP) Wildfires in Canada’s Atlantic coast province of Nova Scotia have caused thousands to evacuate. The Halifax Regional Municipality said late Monday that preliminary estimates indicate approximately 200 homes or structures have been damaged, based on initial visual inspections by first responders. Halifax deputy fire Chief David Meldrum said an estimated 14,000 people were told to flee their homes, most of which are about a 30-minute drive northwest of downtown Halifax.

Police agencies are desperate to hire. But they say few want the job. (Washington Post) The San Francisco Police Department is down more than 600 officers, almost 30 percent of its allotment. Phoenix needs about 500 more officers to be fully staffed. The D.C. police force is smaller than it has been in 50 years, despite troubling gun violence and carjackings, as officers leave faster than they can be replaced. Police departments across the country are struggling to fill their ranks, creating what many current and former officials say is a staffing emergency that threatens public safety. They cite an exodus of veteran officers amid new police accountability measures that followed the 2020 murder of George Floyd, increased hostility from the communities they police, and criminal justice laws that seek to reduce the number of people in jail. Advocates for police reform see the moment as an opportunity to hire a new generation of officers and reimagine policing. But as agencies seek fresh recruits, they are getting fewer qualified applicants than in past years—leading some to make the risky move of lowering the bar for hiring to fill their ranks.

Gun violence rages with at least 20 mass shootings recorded over Memorial Day Weekend (USA Today) Gun violence erupted across the U.S. over Memorial Day weekend: At least 20 mass shootings left 16 people dead and over 80 injured. The Gun Violence Archive, which tracks mass shootings, logged 20 incidents in which at least four people were injured or killed, not including shooters, from Friday afternoon through Monday night. The bloodshed started with a spree in Arizona, where a 20-year-old man was accused of killing four people and injuring one in five different shootings in the Phoenix area. Over the next three days, people were killed and injured in Virginia, Mississippi, New Mexico, Illinois and more. And Monday evening, as Memorial Day revelers in Hollywood Beach, Florida, celebrated the holiday, nine people were injured by gunfire along a boardwalk.

Drought-struck Barcelona quenches thirst with costly desalination (AP) Where once the population of Barcelona drank mostly from its rivers and wells, Spain’s second city now relies upon a labyrinth-like mesh of green, blue and purple pipes inside an industrial plant to keep it from going thirsty amid a prolonged drought. Water is pumped from two kilometers (1.2 miles) into the Mediterranean Sea to where the Llobregat desalination plant sits on an isolated stretch of beach. After journeying through several cleaning and filtering systems it reaches its final stop: the twisting and turning multi-colored channels that squeeze every drop of water free of its salt. Barely used after being built in 2009, Europe’s largest desalination plant for drinking water is running at full throttle to help the greater Barcelona area and some five million people adapt to the impact of climate change, which has contributed to the drying up of southern Europe’s fresh water reserves through heat waves and drought. In April 2021, before the drought, rivers provided 63% of Barcelona’s drinking water, wells provided 34% and desalination just 3%. Two years later desalination makes up 33% of Barcelona’s drinking water, while wells provide 23% and its shrinking rivers just 19%, according to Barcelona’s municipal water company.

Paranoid atmosphere (Washington Post) Parishioners have denounced Russian priests who advocated peace instead of victory in the war on Ukraine. Teachers lost their jobs after children tattled that they opposed the war. Neighbors who bore some trivial grudge for years have snitched on longtime foes. Workers rat on one another to their bosses or directly to the police or the FSB, the Federal Security Service. This is the hostile, paranoid atmosphere of Russians at war with Ukraine and with one another. As Russian President Vladimir Putin’s regime cracks down on critics of the war and other political dissenters, citizens are policing one another in an echo of the darkest years of Joseph Stalin’s repression, triggering investigations, criminal charges, prosecutions and dismissals from work. In March last year, Putin called on the nation to purge itself by spitting out traitors “like gnats.” Since the invasion began, at least 19,718 people have been arrested for their opposition to the war, according to legal rights group OVD-Info, with criminal cases launched against 584 people, and administrative cases mounted against 6,839. Many others faced intimidation or harassment from the authorities, lost jobs, or had relatives targeted, the organization said.

Russia says drones damage Moscow buildings in pre-dawn attack (AP) Russian air defenses stopped eight drones converging on Moscow, officials said Tuesday, in an attack that authorities blamed on Ukraine. The attack caused “insignificant damage” to several buildings, Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin said. Two people received medical attention for unspecified injuries but did not need hospitalization, he said. The attacks have raised questions about the effectiveness of Russia’s air defense systems. A senior Russian lawmaker, Andrei Kartapolov, told Russian business news site RBC that “we have a very big country and there will always be a loophole where the drone can fly around the areas where air defense systems are located.”

30 international peacekeepers injured in fierce clashes with ethnic Serbs in northern Kosovo (AP) The NATO-led peacekeeping force in Kosovo, KFOR, on Tuesday raised the number of its troops injured in fierce clashes with ethnic Serbs to 30. The Serbs had tried to take over the offices of one of the municipalities in northern Kosovo where ethnic Albanian mayors took up their posts last week. A statement said that 11 Italian soldiers and 19 Hungarian ones “sustained multiple injuries, including fractures and burns from improvized explosive incendiary devices.” Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic spent the night with his troops on the border with Kosovo. They were placed on the highest state of alert on his orders last week. Vucic said 52 Serbs were injured in the clashes, three seriously. Kosovo and Serbia have been foes for decades, with Belgrade refusing to recognize Kosovo’s 2008 sovereignty.

Erdogan continues divisive rhetoric following victory (Washington Post) President Recep Tayyip Erdogan sang and smiled, reveling in the applause of the supporters he addressed Sunday after the toughest election of his long career. In victory, though, instead of soothing the nation, he lashed out at a familiar set of villains, in remarks that may set the tone for his next term. He was dismissive of his opponent, Kemal Kilicdaroglu. “Bye, bye to Mr. Kemal,” he said. And he ruled out any release for an imprisoned Kurdish political leader, calling him a “terrorist.” As the country moved on from the election, Erdogan would not easily abandon the bitter rhetoric, analysts said, setting Turkey on a divisive and turbulent course for the foreseeable future, even as Erdogan juggled a need to stabilize the economy as well as Turkey’s often stormy relations with allies in the West. In fact, “I think he is going to harden” his rhetoric, said Berk Esen, a professor of political science at Istanbul’s Sabanci University. “We are going to see him adopt a very polarizing discourse using ethno-religious themes” to maintain his “winning coalition” of voters. The value of the Turkish lira sunk to a record low on Tuesday, just days after Erdogan entrenched his authority into a third decade.

Chinese police clash with protesters over plans to demolish mosque (Washington Post) Residents of a majority-Muslim town in southwestern China clashed with police over the weekend as they tried to stop the demolition of a domed roof from a centuries-old mosque, part of the Chinese Communist Party’s expanding effort to control religion. The incident appeared to be related to a court judgment from 2020 that ruled some of the mosque’s most recent renovations were illegal, and ordered demolition. With a history that may stretch as far back as the 13th century, the Najiaying Mosque was expanded many times over the years to add buildings, as well as four minarets and a domed roof. In 2019, part of the structure was listed as a protected cultural relic. In recent years, however, Communist Party restrictions on the pious have escalated sharply. The country’s top leader, Xi Jinping, has demanded absolute political loyalty of faith communities and the “Sinicization” of religion. Surveillance of religious leaders has also intensified. A nationwide database of officially approved Islamic, Protestant and Catholic religious teachers was launched this month. The campaign has focused on Islam and Christianity because of the party’s deep-seated fear of faith being a vector for foreign influence.

North Korea says it will launch its first military spy satellite in June (AP) North Korea said Tuesday it would launch its first military spy satellite in June and described space-based reconnaissance as crucial for monitoring the United States’ “reckless” military exercises with South Korea. The statement came a day after North Korea notified Japan’s coast guard that the launch, sometime between May 31 and June 11, might affect waters in the Yellow Sea, East China Sea and east of the Philippines’ Luzon Island. Japan’s defense minister warned its forces to shoot down the satellite or debris, if any entered Japanese territory, and its coast guard issued a safety warning for ships that would be in the affected seas during the expected launch, citing a risk of falling debris. While North Korea’s rivals have condemned the country’s planned launch as a banned test of ballistic missile technology, it’s less clear whether the satellite itself is advanced enough to support the North’s stated goals of tracking and monitoring U.S. and South Korean military activities in real time.

Celebrations in Jordan ahead of kingdom’s first major royal wedding in years (AP) Several thousand cheering and flag-waving Jordanians packed a sports stadium for a free concert in the capital of Amman as part of celebrations leading up the kingdom’s first major royal wedding in years. Crown Prince Hussein, 28, is to marry Saudi architect Rajwa Alseif, 29, on Thursday at Zahran Palace in downtown Amman, the same wedding venue previously chosen by the prince’s father, King Abdullah II, and his grandfather, the late King Hussein. The nuptials come after a rough patch for the royals, including a public rift between the king and his half-brother, and are seen as a way of shoring up public support at a time of persistent economic difficulties.

Racers chase cheese wheel down a hill in chaotic UK race (AP) The big cheese of extreme U.K. sports events is back. Hundreds of spectators gathered Monday to watch dozens of reckless racers chase a 7-pound (3 kilogram) wheel of Double Gloucester cheese down the near-vertical Cooper’s Hill, near Gloucester in southwest England. The first racer to finish behind the fast-rolling cheese gets to keep it. The cheese-rolling race has been held at Cooper’s Hill, about 100 miles (160 kilometers) west of London, since at least 1826, and the sport of cheese-rolling is believed to be much older. Few competitors manage to stay on their feet all the way down the 200-yard (180 meter) hill, and this year several had to be helped, limping, from the course. Matt Crolla, 28, from Manchester in northwestern England, won the first of several men’s races. Asked how he had prepared, he told reporters: “I don’t think you can train for it, can you? It’s just being an idiot.” Delaney Irving managed to cross the finish line first to win the women’s competition, even after having been knocked unconscious. Irving, 19, said the race was “good … now that I remember it.”

#headlines #news

[andreipaulcalbonera77]

Reforming the Criminal Justice System for Equality and Rehabilitation

I chose to advocate for this petition because I want to build a fairer society. By addressing systemic inequalities, emphasizing rehabilitation over punishment, and implementing restorative justice practices, we can create a system that treats all individuals equitably and provides opportunities for rehabilitation and reintegration. It is through these transformative changes that we can strive toward a society where justice is truly served and all individuals have the chance to lead meaningful and productive lives.

The criminal justice system is an essential pillar of any society, designed to maintain law and order while ensuring justice and rehabilitation. However, it has long been plagued by systemic inequalities and a focus on punitive measures rather than addressing the root causes of crime. This explores why I have chosen to advocate for the reform of the criminal justice system, with a particular emphasis on promoting equality and rehabilitation as key tenets for a fairer society.

Reforming the criminal justice system is crucial to addressing the longstanding disparities that disproportionately affect marginalized communities. The current system exhibits biases that result in racial and socioeconomic disparities in arrests, convictions, and sentencing. By prioritizing equality, we can aim to eliminate these discrepancies and ensure fair treatment for all individuals, regardless of their background. Implementing unbiased policing practices, promoting diverse representation in the justice system, and training law enforcement and legal professionals in cultural sensitivity are vital steps toward achieving equality within the system.

A key objective of criminal justice reform is shifting the focus from punishment to rehabilitation. The current system often neglects the underlying causes of criminal behavior, perpetuating a cycle of reoffending. By embracing a rehabilitative approach, we can address the root causes of crime, such as poverty, addiction, mental health issues, and a lack of education or job opportunities. Providing access to quality education, vocational training, mental health support, and substance abuse treatment within correctional facilities can equip individuals with the skills and tools they need to reintegrate successfully into society. Emphasizing rehabilitation not only reduces recidivism rates but also fosters a sense of empathy and compassion within the justice system.

Another vital aspect of criminal justice reform is the implementation of restorative justice practices. Instead of solely focusing on punishment, restorative justice seeks to repair the harm caused by crime by involving all affected parties. It encourages dialogue, understanding, and accountability, providing victims with a voice and empowering offenders to take responsibility for their actions. This approach promotes healing, reconciliation, and the restoration of relationships, ultimately leading to a more harmonious and inclusive society.

In conclusion, reforming the criminal justice system may improve the structure of society. By addressing inequality, prioritizing rehabilitation, engaging the community, promoting evidence-based policies, and humanizing the system, we can work towards a more equitable and effective criminal justice system. Through collective action and advocacy, we have the power to bring about meaningful change and build a society that truly values justice and rehabilitation for all.

#fight for justice

[bitsncloudz]

Weed Bongs in Manchester: Navigating the Cultural Shift and Legal Landscape

In recent years, Manchester, like many cities across the globe, has witnessed a significant cultural shift towards the normalization of cannabis and its associated paraphernalia, such as Weed Bongs in Manchester. This evolution reflects a broader trend of changing attitudes towards marijuana, spurred by debates on its medicinal benefits, the economics of legalization, and the social implications of its use. However, navigating the complex terrain of cannabis culture and legality in Manchester demands a nuanced understanding, especially when it comes to the use and possession of weed bongs.

Manchester's vibrant youth culture and its reputation as a hub for musical innovation and artistic expression have contributed to the city's open-minded approach to cannabis. This has been paralleled by the proliferation of head shops and online retailers offering a wide range of cannabis accessories, from simple glass bongs to elaborate, artistically crafted pieces. These outlets not only cater to the functional aspects of cannabis consumption but also contribute to the aesthetic and communal experiences associated with it.

Weed bongs, in particular, have become symbols of cannabis culture, appreciated not just for their utility in consuming marijuana but also for their design and craftsmanship. In Manchester, it's not uncommon to find enthusiasts who collect bongs, much like aficionados of fine wines or cigars. This appreciation extends beyond the object itself, reflecting a deeper engagement with the rituals of preparation and consumption that many users find meaningful.

Despite this cultural acceptance, the legal status of cannabis and its related accessories in the UK, including Manchester, remains fraught with complexity. Under current UK law, cannabis is classified as a Class B drug, and its possession, sale, and distribution are illegal. This classification extends to paraphernalia associated with drug use, including bongs, when used specifically for consuming illegal substances. The legal nuances mean that while selling and possessing bongs per se is not illegal, their association with cannabis can lead to legal challenges.

The legal ambiguity surrounding weed bongs underscores a broader debate on the status of cannabis in the UK. Advocates for legalization argue that reforming cannabis laws could have numerous benefits, including reducing the burden on the criminal justice system, generating tax revenue, and ensuring safer consumption through regulation. Manchester has been a focal point for such discussions, with some local authorities and public figures expressing support for more progressive drug policies.

Moreover, the conversation around cannabis and bongs in Manchester cannot be divorced from its implications on public health and safety. Proponents of legalization often highlight the potential for regulated markets to offer safer, quality-controlled products, thereby reducing the risks associated with adulterated or contaminated street cannabis. Critics, however, caution against the potential for increased use and the societal costs that might entail, advocating for a cautious approach to any changes in the law.

Navigating the cultural acceptance and legal restrictions on weed bongs in Manchester is emblematic of the broader challenges facing cannabis reform in the UK. It reflects a city at the crossroads of tradition and modernity, grappling with how to reconcile evolving social norms with established legal frameworks. As Manchester continues to play a pivotal role in the UK's cannabis debate, the future of weed bongs and their place within the city's culture and legal landscape remains an open question.

For More Info:-

Stash Containers for Weed

Stash Cans for Weed

#Weed Bongs in Manchester

[marxism-lelouchism]

Why Is the Stop Asian Hate Movement Following the Lead of Zionists and Police?

By Dylan Rodríguez, Truthout

Stop Asian Hate’s state-focused liberal social justice orientations hinge on a redemptive political fantasy: a reformed U.S. nation-building project in which police power, criminal jurisprudence, public policy and earnest carceral state actors (including elected officials and prosecutors) strengthen and expand the state’s obligation to protect people of Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) descent from “hate,” “hate crimes,” “hate incidents,” and other forms of racial animus.

Developed to compile and analyze data reflecting “incidents of hate, violence, harassment, discrimination, shunning, and child bullying,” Stop AAPI Hate’s data collection framework relies on the terms and methods of criminology, atomizing “anti-Asian hate” by conceptualizing — and thus narrating — such violence as a matter of discrete events and interpersonal encounters.

By generating an original national dataset, Stop AAPI Hate attracts significant financial and political support from foundations, police and elected state officials, well-funded Asian American nonprofits, and Asian American celebrities, academics, industry executives and cultural/social media influencers.

Confoundingly, the organization asserts that it’s “grounded in the belief that we must confront racism at its root with comprehensive, non-carceral solutions to effectively prevent and respond to anti-AAPI hate.” Directly contradicting this stated ambition, Stop AAPI Hate’s state-focused advocacy and data curation reproduces rather than disrupts carceral notions of violence, justice and criminal deterrence.

The presence of Anti-Defamation League (ADL) National Director and CEO Jonathan Greenblatt on [The Asian American Foundation's] board reflects a key political and organizational influence on the foundation’s mission.

Since its founding in 1913, the ADL has functioned as a watchdog organization that ostensibly identifies antisemitic activities and calls on institutional leaders, state officials, corporations and media outlets to condemn, fire or otherwise disaffiliate from those it deems culpable. Crucially, the ADL endorses a definition of antisemitism closely aligned with the one adopted in 2016 by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA), which has been subject to mounting scholarly, legal and activist criticism for conflating criticism of Israel and the ethno-supremacist political ideology of Zionism with antisemitism.

Nonetheless, Stop AAPI Hate, TAAF and other Stop Asian Hate organizations not only tacitly comply with the ADL’s positions, but also replicate its organizational fixation on “hate” as the primary unit of analysis, public discourse and liberal state intervention. As Stop Asian Hate replicates the ADL’s methods, it’s worth raising a key question: What are the consequences of these organizations’ shared frameworks of “hate” victimization?

While it does not feature a similar group of advisers, Stop AAPI Hate quietly maintains strong ties to organizations with histories of punishing critics of Israel as well as people involved in Palestinian solidarity organizing.

Stop Asian Hate effectively advocates a form of populist criminology that calls for an inclusive, aggressive, equity-oriented response from the domestic warmaking state. This amounts to a reformist mandate to re-legitimate anti-Black, colonial, carceral state violence in a moment of crisis. In this sense, Stop Asian Hate represents an early-21st century Asian Americanist equity grievance that looks to the state as its arbiter, protector and militarized authority figure.

#people have been pointing out the carceral logics of “stop asian hate” since day one #so the alliance between asian american liberals and zionists is unsurprising if not expected #my two cents on the “confounding” hypocrisy of stop aapi hate claiming to want non-carceral solutions while doing the total opposite: #stop asian hate sloganeering happened at the same time as the george floyd uprisings #liberal nonblack institutions felt keenly the pressure to publicly espouse “abolitionist” positions #and simultaneously “stop asian hate” was used as a counterinsurgency tool to relegitimate carceral state power

[karnsandkarns12]

Champions of Justice: Leading Civil Rights Attorneys Making History

Introduction

In the ongoing struggle for Civil rights and Social Justice, there are individuals whose names may not always make headlines, yet their work is nothing short of monumental. These are the champions of justice, the best civil rights attorneys whose dedication, resilience, and unwavering commitment have shaped history and transformed societies.

Thurgood Marshall: Pioneering Equality Through Law

One cannot discuss Civil Rights Lawyer without mentioning Thurgood Marshall, a towering figure in American legal history. As the first African American Supreme Court Justice and a leading attorney for the NAACP, Marshall fought tirelessly against racial segregation. His landmark victory in Brown v. Board of Education marked a turning point in the battle for racial equality, striking down the doctrine of “separate but equal” and paving the way for desegregation in schools nationwide.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Trailblazer for Gender Equality

Ruth Bader Ginsburg, fondly known as the “Notorious RBG,” was a force to be reckoned with in the fight for gender equality. As an attorney with the ACLU’s Women’s Rights Project and later as a Supreme Court Justice, Ginsburg championed women’s rights with unmatched fervor. Her strategic litigation and unwavering advocacy dismantled discriminatory laws and entrenched gender stereotypes, leaving an indelible mark on the legal landscape.

Bryan Stevenson: Defending the Rights of the Marginalized

In more recent times, Bryan Stevenson has emerged as a leading voice for criminal justice reform and racial equality. As the founder of the Equal Justice Initiative, Stevenson has dedicated his career to representing death row inmates, challenging wrongful convictions, and confronting systemic injustices in the legal system. His memoir, “Just Mercy,” and the subsequent film adaptation have shed light on the urgent need for compassion and fairness in the criminal justice system.

Vanita Gupta: Fighting for Civil Rights in the Modern Era

Vanita Gupta, a The Best Civil Rights Attorney and former head of the Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice, has been a steadfast advocate for marginalized communities. From her work on criminal justice reform to her efforts to combat voter suppression and protect LGBTQ+ rights, Gupta’s leadership has been instrumental in advancing civil rights in the modern era.

Conclusion:

The legacy of these leading The Best Civil Rights Attorneys serves as a testament to the power of the law as a tool for social change. Through their tireless advocacy, groundbreaking litigation, and unwavering commitment to justice, they have paved the way for a more equitable and inclusive society. As we celebrate their achievements, let us also heed their call to continue the fight for justice, equality, and dignity for all.

#the best civil rights attorneys #the best civil rights lawyers

[donalz]

Navigating the Importance and Implications of Criminal Record Checks

Criminal record checks play a pivotal role in various aspects of modern society, influencing employment decisions, legal proceedings, and community safety. As a tool for assessing an individual's past interactions with the law, these checks provide valuable information that can impact both personal and professional aspects of life. In this article, criminal record checks we will delve into the importance and implications of criminal record checks, exploring their significance in different contexts.

Understanding Criminal Record Checks:

Criminal record checks, also known as background checks or police checks, involve the examination of an individual's criminal history. These checks typically include information about arrests, convictions, and any other interactions with the legal system. The scope and depth of these checks can vary depending on the purpose, ranging from basic screenings for employment to more comprehensive investigations conducted by law enforcement agencies.

Employment and Professional Opportunities:

One of the primary contexts in which criminal record checks are employed is during the hiring process. Employers often use these checks to assess the suitability of a candidate for a particular job. Industries such as healthcare, finance, and education, where trust and responsibility are paramount, frequently require thorough background checks.

While these checks serve as a valuable risk management tool for employers, they also raise ethical concerns. Critics argue that overly strict policies may perpetuate discrimination, limiting opportunities for individuals with past convictions who have served their sentences and are seeking reintegration into society.

Legal Proceedings:

Criminal record checks are fundamental in legal proceedings, aiding judges, attorneys, and law enforcement agencies in assessing the credibility and background of individuals involved in a case. Access to accurate and up-to-date criminal records is crucial for making informed decisions regarding bail, sentencing, and parole.

However, concerns about the accuracy of these records and potential bias in the criminal justice system have been raised. Advocates for criminal justice reform argue that the system may disproportionately impact certain demographics, leading to over-policing and systemic inequalities.

Community Safety:

Criminal record checks are integral to maintaining community safety. Landlords, for instance, often conduct these checks as part of the tenant screening process to ensure the safety and well-being of residents. Additionally, various volunteer organizations, such as those working with vulnerable populations, may require volunteers to undergo background checks to protect the individuals they serve.

Balancing Privacy and Public Safety:

While the importance of criminal record checks is evident, it is crucial to strike a balance between privacy rights and public safety. Overly broad or indiscriminate use of this information can perpetuate stigma and hinder rehabilitation efforts for individuals with a criminal history.

Conclusion:

Criminal record checks are a multifaceted tool with significant implications for individuals and society as a whole. Striking a balance between the need for public safety and the protection of individual rights is essential. As technology advances and societal norms evolve, it is imperative to continually reassess and refine the use of criminal record checks to ensure they serve their intended purposes without perpetuating discrimination or hindering rehabilitation efforts.

[ronaldlbook]

The Dynamic Intersection of Government Law & Lobbying: State Legislative Lobbying and Coalitions Around Key Policy Issues

Lobbying has long been an integral part of the political landscape in the United States. It involves individuals, groups, or organizations advocating for their interests, shaping policy decisions, and influencing legislation. Within this sphere of influence, state legislative lobbying takes center stage as it navigates the intricacies of government law while building coalitions to advance key policy issues.

The Art of State Legislative Lobbying

State legislatures play a pivotal role in shaping the policies that directly impact the lives of Americans. State governments have significant authority in education, healthcare, environmental regulations, and criminal justice reform. Lobbying at the state level aims to guide these decisions by actively engaging with lawmakers, agencies, and the broader public.

State legislative lobbying involves several crucial elements:

Policy Advocacy

Lobbyists at the state level focus on advocating for or against specific policies. They work to shape legislation, draft bills, and propose amendments that align with their clients' interests. Successful lobbying can lead to the introduction of bills, revisions to existing laws, or the defeat of unfavorable legislation.

Coalition Building

To maximize their influence, lobbyists often form coalitions around crucial policy issues. These coalitions bring together diverse stakeholders, including businesses, advocacy groups, nonprofits, and community organizations. Working collaboratively, they pool resources, share expertise, and present a unified front to policymakers.

Grassroots Mobilization

Lobbyists leverage grassroots efforts to generate public support for their causes. This can involve organizing rallies, public hearings, letter-writing campaigns, and engaging constituents to communicate their views to lawmakers. Grassroots mobilization adds a crucial layer of public pressure to legislative efforts.

 Legal Expertise

Understanding government law is essential for effective lobbying. Lobbyists must navigate the legislative process, stay informed about regulatory changes, and ensure their efforts comply with legal requirements. Legal expertise is particularly crucial in addressing potential ethics or compliance issues.

The Role of Government Law

Government law serves as the framework within which lobbying operates. It encompasses rules, regulations, and ethical guidelines that govern the interactions between lobbyists, lawmakers, and government institutions. Lobbyists must understand and adhere to government law to maintain transparency, accountability, and ethical standards in their activities.

Critical aspects of government law that influence state legislative lobbying include:

Lobbying Registration and Disclosure

Many states require lobbyists to register with relevant authorities and disclose their activities, including clients, expenditures, and legislative targets. This transparency allows the public to track lobbying efforts and identify potential conflicts of interest.

Campaign Finance Regulations

Campaign contributions and political donations are subject to strict regulations in many states. Lobbyists must navigate these rules to ensure their financial support for candidates and political parties remains within legal limits.

 Ethical Standards

Lobbyists are often held to high ethical standards. Violations, such as bribery or undue influence, can result in legal consequences. Government law sets forth guidelines to maintain the integrity of lobbying practices.

Conflict of Interest Rules

Government law may restrict lobbyists who previously held public office or government positions to prevent conflicts of interest. These rules ensure lobbying activities do not compromise the public interest.

Building Coalitions for Impact

One of the most potent strategies in state legislative lobbying is the formation of coalitions. Coalitions are alliances of diverse organizations and individuals who share a common interest or policy goal. By coming together, these groups amplify their voices and pool resources to achieve their objectives.

Benefits of Coalitions in Lobbying

Strength in Numbers: Coalitions bring together various stakeholders with varied expertise and resources. This collective power can be more influential than individual efforts.

Expertise Sharing: Different coalition members often bring unique perspectives and specialized knowledge. This allows for well-informed policy proposals and strategies.

Diverse Representation: Coalitions can include businesses, nonprofits, advocacy groups, community organizations, and more. This diversity reflects the broad impact of policies and helps ensure that the interests of various communities are considered.

Unified Messaging: A coalition can develop a clear and consistent message to present to legislators and the public. This cohesion enhances their ability to convey the importance of their policy goals.

Grassroots Mobilization: Coalitions can mobilize supporters on a large scale, organizing rallies, letter-writing campaigns, and public awareness initiatives. Grassroots efforts create a groundswell of support for legislative changes.

Case Study: The Fight for Environmental Regulations

Consider a coalition advocating for stricter environmental regulations at the state level. This coalition may include environmental nonprofits, renewable energy companies, concerned citizens, and scientific experts. Together, they aim to influence legislation that addresses climate change and reduces pollution.

By pooling their resources, the coalition conducts research, runs public awareness campaigns, and engages in direct lobbying efforts. They present a united front to lawmakers, emphasizing stronger regulations' economic, health, and environmental benefits. Grassroots mobilization encourages citizens to contact their legislators, attend hearings, and support the proposed policies.

Through strategic coalition-building and lobbying efforts, this group can significantly impact shaping environmental policy at the state level.

The Ethical Imperative

While lobbying and coalition-building are legitimate and essential to the democratic process, they must be conducted ethically and transparently. Government law sets the foundation for ethical lobbying practices, but it is incumbent upon lobbyists and their clients to adhere to these standards rigorously.

Ethical Considerations in Lobbying

Transparency: Lobbyists should be transparent about their clients, activities, and financial relationships. Disclosing potential conflicts of interest is critical to maintaining public trust.

Honesty: Lobbyists should provide accurate information to policymakers and the public. Misrepresentation or manipulation can lead to ethical breaches.

Respect for the Legislative Process: Lobbyists should respect the legislative process and the authority of elected officials. Attempts to bypass or undermine the process can erode trust in government.

Accountability: Lobbyists and their clients should be accountable for their actions. Violations of government law or ethical standards should have consequences.

State legislative lobbying is a complex and influential part of the American political landscape. It combines the art of advocacy with a deep understanding of government law, all while leveraging coalitions to drive change. Lobbyists, coalition members, and policymakers must navigate this terrain with integrity, ensuring that their efforts benefit the public interest and maintain the integrity of the democratic process.

As lobbyists and coalitions continue to shape state policies, their role in democracy will remain essential. By adhering to government law and ethical standards, they can help create a more transparent, accountable, and responsive government that effectively addresses the needs and concerns of the people. In this dynamic intersection of government law and lobbying, the future of state policy-making will be shaped, one key issue at a time.

[moni2690]

Top criminal law firms in India

I. Introduction

A. Top Criminal Law Firms-

Criminal law firms in India specialize in providing legal representation to individuals facing criminal charges. These firms play a crucial role in ensuring fair trials and protecting the rights of the accused.

B. Importance of Choosing a Top Criminal Law Firm

The consequences of criminal charges can be severe, emphasizing the importance of selecting a reputable law firm. A top criminal law firm can significantly impact the outcome of a case.

C. Swastik Legal's Reputation in India

Swastik Legal has earned a stellar reputation for its unwavering commitment to legal excellence and client success. With a focus on criminal defense, the firm has become synonymous with trust and reliability.

II. What Sets Swastik Legal Apart?

A. Expertise in Criminal Law

Swastik Legal boasts a team of seasoned legal experts specializing in criminal law. Their in-depth knowledge and experience set them apart, allowing clients to benefit from strategic and effective defense.

B. Track Record of Success

The firm's track record of success speaks volumes about its proficiency in handling complex legal matters. Swastik Legal has successfully navigated numerous cases, securing favorable outcomes for its clients.

C. Client Testimonials

The positive testimonials from satisfied clients highlight Swastik Legal's commitment to delivering results. Clients consistently praise the firm for its professionalism, dedication, and personalized approach.

III. Areas of Practice

A. Comprehensive Criminal Defense Services

Swastik Legal offers a wide range of criminal defense services, covering everything from white-collar crimes to serious felonies. The firm's comprehensive approach ensures that clients receive tailored legal solutions.

B. High-Profile Cases Handled

The firm has successfully represented clients in high-profile cases, showcasing its ability to handle legal challenges of any magnitude. Swastik Legal's involvement in such cases underscores its competence and reliability.

C. Specialized Legal Expertise

Swastik Legal's legal team possesses specialized expertise in various areas of criminal law. This ensures that clients benefit from the nuanced understanding required to navigate complex legal landscapes.

IV. Team of Legal Experts

A. Experienced Attorneys

Swastik Legal's team comprises highly experienced attorneys with a proven track record. Their expertise and courtroom skills contribute to the firm's reputation as a formidable force in criminal defense.

B. Support Staff and Resources

Behind every successful legal team is a dedicated support staff and abundant resources. Swastik Legal invests in its infrastructure to provide comprehensive support to its legal professionals.

C. Commitment to Client Success

At the core of Swastik Legal's ethos is an unwavering commitment to client success. The firm takes pride in going the extra mile to secure favorable outcomes for those it represents.

V. Legal Strategies and Approaches

A. Tailored Legal Solutions

Swastik Legal understands that no two cases are alike. The firm adopts a personalized approach, crafting legal strategies tailored to the unique circumstances of each client.

B. Innovative Approaches to Defense

In the dynamic field of criminal law, innovation is key. Swastik Legal embraces innovative approaches to defense, staying ahead of legal trends to provide cutting-edge representation.

C. Proven Case Resolutions

The firm's focus on delivering tangible results is evident in its track record of proven case resolutions. Swastik Legal's ability to achieve positive outcomes reinforces its status as a leading criminal law firm.

VI. Swastik Legal's Impact on Legal Landscape

A. Contributions to Legal Reform

Beyond individual cases, Swastik Legal actively contributes to legal reform initiatives. The firm plays a role in shaping the legal landscape, advocating for fairness and justice.

B. Community Engagement

Swastik Legal is not just a legal entity; it's a community partner. The firm engages with the community through various initiatives, promoting legal awareness and access to justice.

C. Recognition and Awards

The legal community recognizes Swastik Legal's contributions, with accolades and awards highlighting its impact on the legal field. The firm's commitment to excellence is acknowledged by peers and industry experts.

VII. Client-Centric Approach

A. Personalized Legal Guidance

Clients appreciate Swastik Legal's commitment to providing personalized legal guidance. The firm ensures that clients are informed and empowered throughout the legal process.

B. Transparent Communication

Clear and transparent communication is a cornerstone of Swastik Legal's client-centric approach. Clients are kept informed about case developments, fostering trust and collaboration.

C. Accessibility and Support

Swastik Legal understands the importance of accessibility. The firm's commitment to being accessible ensures that clients receive the support they need, when they need it.

VIII. How to Choose the Right Criminal Law Firm

A. Factors to Consider

When choosing a best criminal litigation law firms in India, several factors come into play, including expertise, reputation, and success rate. Swastik Legal excels in each of these criteria.

B. Importance of Legal Specialization

Legal specialization is crucial in navigating the complexities of criminal law. Swastik Legal's focused expertise ensures

#law firms #lawyer #Criminal law firms in India #legal services #legal advice

[qnewslgbtiqa]

Championing Equality through Education

New Post has been published on https://qnews.com.au/championing-equality-through-education/

Championing Equality through Education

Change doesn’t just happen in courtrooms or in the halls of parliament. It happens in classrooms, lecture halls and in the minds of young people who are given the chance to learn and grow.

WORDS Nicholas Stewart

During my time heading up criminal and human rights legal teams, I have witnessed firsthand the transformative power of education.

Education isn’t just about acquiring knowledge; it’s about opening doors to a brighter and more inclusive future for everyone.

That’s why Dowson Turco Lawyers joined forces with The Pinnacle Foundation at its 2023 fundraiser in December to support LGBTQA+ students in higher education across Australia.

Higher education is a key factor in lifting Australia’s economic and social standards – it’s about empowering individuals to make meaningful contributions to society.

This is particularly important for LGBTQA+ students, who face unique challenges and barriers in their educational journey.

Current NSW and Commonwealth laws still permit discrimination of LGBTQA+ students and teachers on the basis of religious belief, underscoring the urgency of our mission.

The National LGBTIQ+ Health Alliance‘s research highlights alarming rates of self-harm and psychological distress among young LGBTQA+ individuals, often stemming from stigma and discrimination.

The Writing Themselves in 4 report likewise paints a stark picture of the experiences of LGBTQA+ youth in educational settings.

In the past year, 60.2% of secondary school students reported feeling unsafe or uncomfortable due to their sexuality or gender identity, along with 33.8% of those at TAFE and 29.2% of those at university.

Worse still, 40.8% of young LGBTQA+ people experienced verbal harassment, 22.8% sexuaL harassment or assault and 9.7% physical harassment or assault. An alarming 81% reported high or very high levels of psychological distress. These statistics prove that investing in educational support for LGBTQA+ students is a critical step towards a more equitable society.

At Dowson Turco, we’ve seen how legal advocacy, combined with educational support, can create lasting change.

Recently, we represented a non-binary student facing discrimination and harm in a regional NSW Catholic school. Our legal intervention and support led to significant policy changes, ensuring a safer and more inclusive environment.

As a member of the Diversity and Inclusion Committee at the Law Society of NSW, I have also seen the impact of initiatives that promote law reform and inclusion policies.

But meaningful change takes more than tokenistic gestures.

Beyond financial contributions, individuals and companies need to take an active role in raising awareness, engaging in meaningful dialogue and advocating for policy changes which support inclusive practices and year-round community engagement.

Through corporate donations and support of the Pinnacle Foundation, we can fund scholarships that address financial barriers facing many LGBTQA+ students, including tuition fees, books and living expenses.

By investing in LGBTQA+ education, we’re empowering future leaders and thinkers who will carry the banner of diversity and inclusion into every corner of society.

From government, to civil society, to the corporate sector, we want LGBTQA+ leaders qualified and experienced in business, economics, law, management, the arts, medicine and other disciplines, so that the organisations they lead become more inclusive.

As a proudly gay-owned and operated law firm, our partnership with the Pinnacle Foundation is more than just a philanthropic endeavour. It’s a reflection of our core values.

At Dowson Turco, we are advocates for change, champions of justice and supporters of those who are often marginalised.

We are committed to making a difference in the lives of LGBTQA+ students – unlocking potential, breaking down barriers and building bridges to a more diverse and inclusive society.

-Nicholas Stewart is a leading criminal and human rights lawyer and a partner at Dowson Turco Lawyers

For the latest LGBTIQA+ Sister Girl and Brother Boy news, entertainment, community stories in Australia, visit qnews.com.au. Check out our latest magazines or find us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and YouTube.