Tumgik
theexodvs · 1 day
Text
My regiment for CSBD
Join an accountability group
Exercise as often as your schedule permits, running and/or weights
Try to get your hands on anti-depressaants that have a side effect of lessened sexual drive. If all the psychs in your area are CSBD-deniers, benadryl can lessen sexual desire for a time, but it can also make you drowsy, so find a balance.
Put filters on your computer that a trusted person of the same gender has access to.
For men, give up every last narrative of male victimhood, particularly your own. Stop saying things like, "The pandemic made me relapse," instead of "I used the pandemic as an excuse to relapse."
Admit this problem to your significant other. Go to marriage counseling if you are married. If you are not, they might leave you, and you'd deserve it. Don't get back into the dating scene until you are emotionally prepared to die alone and have all your habits under control.
Read resources by people who acknowledge the existence of CSBD or similar conditions. "Closing the Window" by Chester and "L.I.F.E. Guide for Men" by Laaser are both excellent in this regard.
0 notes
theexodvs · 2 days
Text
Everyone I've heard romanticize singleness got married under the age of 25 and/or has been divorced and/or is a hedonist.
0 notes
theexodvs · 3 days
Note
wheres your stupid ass pinned post?
Must've gotten deleted for some reason. Here's the new one.
0 notes
theexodvs · 3 days
Text
The Handy-Dandy Exo Intro and FAQ!
26. Engaged. My pronouns are uses/bathroom/standing. I am the intersection of BLM Tumblr, Christblr, and the part of Tumblr that criticizes MRAs.
Limited atonement and human sexual dimorphism are beautiful wonderful things.
Scrupulosity, touch starvation, and adolescence are figments of the psychoanalytical imagination.
I block all porn accounts I come across and unabashedly kink-shame.
My anons have anger issues.
When and why did you reject the men’s rights movement? The explanation can be found here.
Suicide-baiting is bad, m'kay? Yes, I know that now. I have apologized for the post you’re talking about, and have removed it.
Do you really think autistic people are perpetual children or think Autism Speaks is a reputable organization? Not anymore, and I haven’t in some time. I have redacted these statements publicly. However, most of my disagreements with other statements made by Temple Grandin and John Elder Robison still stand.
Are you a feminist? Depends largely on the definition. I don’t go about self-identifying as a feminist, but the fact I recognize women are vulnerable, even in rich, western countries, causes other people to see me as one. I stopped caring what people called me a while ago.
Doesn’t your refusal to call yourself a feminist make you as bad as Mpov or SirYouAreBeingMocked refusing to call themselves MRAs? It doesn’t make them “bad,” it makes them look ridiculous. The MRM is a much newer, smaller, and ideologically homogenous movement than feminism, and thus there are still major, definitive tenets it adheres to, all of which Mpov and SirYouAreBeingMocked agree with. The tenets of feminism vary widely by school of thought. I’m not even sure any feminist school of thought would want me in their ranks, while MRAs of all stripes will reblog posts from Mpov and SirYouAreBeingMocked like they’re God-breathed. They should just admit that they’re MRAs, and get on with their lives. It’s not like non-MRAs believe them when they deny being in the movement, anyway.
Do you promote feminist talking points because you think it will land you in a romantic or sexual relationship? When I began to repudiate the MRM, I was attempting to woo a libfem. It had less to do with the fact that she was a libfem, but rather she was one of the first people I met at university. She rejected me anyway, and afterwards I have only sought out women who adhered to (or whom I initially believed to adhere to) Biblical commandments on human sexuality, which exclude premarital intercourse.
Why do you police other men’s masculinity? They have a very twisted view of what it means to be a man. They think that leaving scathing reposts towards angry lesbians with stupid haircuts is a good use of their time.
What are your views on the creation/evolution debate? I’m no expert on the subject, but I no longer believe the Earth has existed for a four-digit number of years, and I have not in some time. For the record, prominent fundamentalists such as William Jennings Bryan didn’t either, and he represented the prosecution during the Monkey Trial.
What are your views on abortion? I am an abolitionist.
What’s with you and criticizing Israel/Zionism? I find myself under a religious umbrella term that includes those people who consider even the slightest questioning of modern Israel’s place in Biblical prophecy to be an unforgivable sin. Thanks, Jerry Falwell Sr!
Do you believe in replacement theology/supersessionism? These terms are meaningless neologisms invented by Christian apocalypticists in recent centuries to describe anyone who holds a different viewpoint regarding Biblical covenants. The only thing either of these terms has ever meant is “not dispensationalism.”
Why are you critical of American evangelicalism while calling yourself an evangelical in your bio? I find introspection to be valuable, and what I mainly criticize are fundamentalist, Americanist, and apocalyptic tendencies within American evangelicalism.
Which version of the Bible do you generally read? In English, I tend to use the NASB or ESV, depending on the context, as they are both devoted to accuracy in translation. Since I was able to find a bilingual Chinese-English Bible with ESV, that’s the one I use in print, while the NASB is what I use on my phone. For Chinese, I use either the CUV or RCUV (the latter I use in print).
Are you a virgin? Yes, because I fear the wrath of Almighty God. If I was an actual virgin with rage and didn’t hold the Seventh Commandment in high regard, I’d have bought a hooker by now.
Who have you voted for? I turned 18 in 2015. I didn’t vote in 2016, and I voted for Jorgensen in 2020 (which I now consider a grave mistake). If the Constitution Party can manage to put someone out who isn’t a racist next year, I’ll vote for them, but otherwise, I’ll likely vote for whoever the ASP puts out.
What is your political philosophy? I'm a theonomist.
Are you an advocate for purity culture? The main issue I have with purity culture as it is currently practiced in American evangelicalism is that it expects more from women than from men. If we shamed men who slept around (regardless of their political affiliation) and stigmatized men in revealing clothing, I believe that purity culture can be viable.
Do you oppose the war on drugs/support prison reform/hate cops because you fetishize black women? “Fetishize” is a very strong word. I have an attraction to black women, which I discovered well after I began to publicly criticize the status quo of the American criminal justice system (in particular, the war on drugs). My criticisms are rooted in the fact that it is currently very wasteful, and no matter how bad weed, crack, or even meth is, it should not be something every employer for the rest of one’s life has to know about or a reason to put someone in prison.
Who are the weeb, 40-year-old cage-stage dispensationalist, person who thinks Perry and Behar are predators, and person who fiddles with skulls mentioned in your bio? Someoneintheshadow456, Sneggleblech, Exposing-the-Bullshit, and Hominishostilis (or whatever handle he’s going by right now).
Why did you think Hominishostilis’s girlfriend was fake/he paid her to take pictures? He refused to marry the mother of his son, so it is my understanding that he has commitment issues. I never claimed any money changed hands to take any of the pictures of the two of them. I claimed (half-jokingly) that he was photographed next to a woman he thought was attractive and made a big deal out of it.
Are you jealous of Hom because he’s married and you aren’t? Not really. He’s several years older than me, shares similarly low standards with his wife, and will probably divorce her before 2030 rolls around.
Why do you generally refuse to engage SirYouAreBeingMocked? He is not actually interested in truth. He is interested in having a debate.
Why haven’t you interacted with Mpov that much since he became active again? Because his backstory changes more often and has more plotholes than a poorly-written Sonic OC.
Do you live with your mom? I live with two male housemates, over 350 miles from my parents’ house.
Why is a doctrine that teaches there are some people who are hellbound a beautiful, wonderful thing? Because the important part of Malachi 1:2-3 is not, “Esau I have hated,” but, “I have loved Jacob.”
I’ve found your account on a different website/know your actual name! And?
0 notes
theexodvs · 4 days
Text
You pay for her meal so she'll get into your bed.
I pay for her meal to prove that I can be a provider someday.
We are not the same.
0 notes
theexodvs · 6 days
Text
Anytime something is objectively damaging for women but makes ppl money they just get academics to write some opaque gibberish about how it's actually empowering and feminist via Long Division and then force-feed that POV to undergraduates-whose job it is to vomit it to all their friends. So in the end, what makes corporations, insurance companies, sex industry stakeholders etc money is somehow always in alignment with the latest 19th wave of feminism
377 notes · View notes
theexodvs · 7 days
Text
It's still unverified anecdotal data, one of the same things that plagued Wakefield's studies. Kinsey's work is full of it. Also a lack of control groups.
Not one of Alfred Kinsey's studies could withstand anywhere close to the amount of scrutiny that has been applied to Andrew Wakefield's 1998 study without being retracted.
7 notes · View notes
theexodvs · 7 days
Text
So I could pursue a habit you knew I had already quit.
Michelangelo's David is kitsch, and was the day it was sculpted.
The Discobolus of Myron is kitsch, and was the day it was sculpted.
The right half of Botero's Adam and Eve is kitsch, and was the day it was painted.
Pollaiuolo's Battle of the Nudes is kitsch, and was the day it was engraved.
No matter how much these works are puffed up in art history classes the world over, male nudity is inherently disgusting and kitsch, and always has been.
12 notes · View notes
theexodvs · 7 days
Text
Tumblr media
633 notes · View notes
theexodvs · 8 days
Text
Most of Sexual Behavior in the Human Male relies on anecdotes. To the Kinsey Institute's own admission. Assuming table 34 is to be taken as face value, Kinsey added results gathered from actual child rape. That, or the respondent was lying out of his ass, which makes the study even less tenable. And how many studies since then have produced similar results in general population samples?
Not one of Alfred Kinsey's studies could withstand anywhere close to the amount of scrutiny that has been applied to Andrew Wakefield's 1998 study without being retracted.
7 notes · View notes
theexodvs · 8 days
Text
I'm referencing your Freudian slip here.
Michelangelo's David is kitsch, and was the day it was sculpted.
The Discobolus of Myron is kitsch, and was the day it was sculpted.
The right half of Botero's Adam and Eve is kitsch, and was the day it was painted.
Pollaiuolo's Battle of the Nudes is kitsch, and was the day it was engraved.
No matter how much these works are puffed up in art history classes the world over, male nudity is inherently disgusting and kitsch, and always has been.
12 notes · View notes
theexodvs · 8 days
Text
Oh, that's rich, saying you want to inspect a man's body while at the same time accusing him of being a repressed homosexual.
Michelangelo's David is kitsch, and was the day it was sculpted.
The Discobolus of Myron is kitsch, and was the day it was sculpted.
The right half of Botero's Adam and Eve is kitsch, and was the day it was painted.
Pollaiuolo's Battle of the Nudes is kitsch, and was the day it was engraved.
No matter how much these works are puffed up in art history classes the world over, male nudity is inherently disgusting and kitsch, and always has been.
12 notes · View notes
theexodvs · 8 days
Text
Interestingly enough, it is exceedingly rare for cults led by women to practice polygamy. It was not a practice within the Shakers or Christian Science. Whether the male-led splinters of the neurodiversity movement embrace it has yet to be seen, but my prediction would be that these splinters will be led by autistic men whose social deficits will promote serial adultery at best, or neurotypical creeps who prey on disabled women.
And, no, I don't believe every disabled woman is vulnerable. But they are disproportionately more likely to be than the general female population.
The leading figures of neurodiversity are Grandin, Robison, Silberman, Baron-Cohen, and Atwood. All of them are 65 or older, so adherents of the movement will have to consider, "Where do we go from here?"
While one might want to hope that one group keeps the name while abandoning the cultic teaching, like what happened after the death of Herbert W. Armstrong, but most Armstrongists broke fellowship with this reformist faction led by Tkach and continued promoting Armstrongist doctrine.
On the other hand, one might envision a scenario where the group remains, and its teachings do not change substantially, but its numbers and influence wane, like what happened after the death of Mary Baker Eddy. While the disease denialism certainly paints the picture of the neurodiversity movement consisting of Eddy's spiritual descendants, her group was way too small and centralized and she did basically everything possible to avoid splintering.
One might anticipate something similar to the aftermath of Joseph Smith, CT Russell, or Ahn Sahng-hong, where two major groups emerge, or one major group amidst a flurry of smaller groups emerge, each swearing on their life they are promoting their founders' actual teaching. However, again, these movement were way more centralized than the neurodiversity movement.
The best comparison is likely what happened in the years after the deaths of Alexander Campbell and Barton Stone. They engineered a movement that was decentralized by design, so there were several different figures all insisting the others were promoting false ideas. A few major groups have arisen, some more decentralized than others, but their movement is still primarily decentralized.
The likely causes of splintering for the neurodiversity movement in the coming years will likely include functioning labels, which illnesses they think are quirky enough for inclusion under their umbrella, whether to use communication devices and which, the validity of self-diagnosis, how much treatment is too much treatment, and which books and studies fit into the neurodiverse canon.
These are the issues the neurodiversity movement will find itself contending with.
5 notes · View notes
theexodvs · 8 days
Text
Noticing the patterns of a cultic movement is not the same thing as being bitter that other people are happy.
I've witnessed too many people fall victim to cults.
Also, have fun years from now with the confusion and disagreement about where you'll take your relationship with your girlfriend (if you're still together)! Cheers!
Mark my words, adherents of the neurodiversity movement are going to dispute whether Simon Baron-Cohen actually wrote his currently-recognized writings regarding the theory of mind and the extreme male brain hypothesis within a century of his death. However, the Eindhoven study will remain in the movement's canon, because of course it will.
6 notes · View notes
theexodvs · 8 days
Text
Which I've never seen, and whose relevance to the conservation I do not know.
Going to start referring to cumbrains as "Kinseyans," and insisting they accept different "interpretations" of the DSM-V so that it doesn't *really* deny the existence of pornography addiction.
Also going to note how the members of the governing bodies that determined the content of the DSM 5 were surrounded from youth by Hooters, Victoria's Secret, and adult video stores on all sides, so their denial of porn addiction needs to be placed in its proper cultural and historical context.
5 notes · View notes
theexodvs · 8 days
Text
Women outnumber men, so I'd question how normal male bodies are. At any rate, you've done the same with self-introspection.
It's also how I fight back against cultural andromania.
Michelangelo's David is kitsch, and was the day it was sculpted.
The Discobolus of Myron is kitsch, and was the day it was sculpted.
The right half of Botero's Adam and Eve is kitsch, and was the day it was painted.
Pollaiuolo's Battle of the Nudes is kitsch, and was the day it was engraved.
No matter how much these works are puffed up in art history classes the world over, male nudity is inherently disgusting and kitsch, and always has been.
12 notes · View notes
theexodvs · 8 days
Text
My therapist actually set me loose after I stopped having outbursts of anger, but ok. I was paying the guy $60 a session, mind you.
"You don't believe in scrupulousity? You're a denialist!"
"You're also a denialist of humor theory, phrenology, female hysteria, drapetomania, the effectiveness of lobotomies, and the vast majority of medical concepts that have ever been proposed."
5 notes · View notes