Tumgik
#vaccine injuries
gettothestabbing · 2 years
Link
Naomi Wolf ran a crowd-sourced analysis project to analyze 300,000 Pfizer documents that were released thanks to a FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) request. In January, US District Judge Mark Pittman of the Northern District of Texas ruled that the documents be released, and the results found are stunning.
The research found that 44% of women who participated in the Pfizer trial of the coronavirus vaccine lost their baby. Wolf was interviewed on Steve Bannon's show "War Room" to discuss the effects of the vaccine on pregnant mothers.
“Women will understand how tragic this is. Pfizer took those deaths of babies, those spontaneous abortions and miscarriages, and recategorized them as ‘recovered result adverse effects.’ In other words, if you lost your baby, it was categorized by Pfizer as a resolved adverse event, like a headache that got better,” Wolf said.
This data has never been released to the public before and women have been gaslit to believe that their periods were never actually affected by the coronavirus vaccine (even though it was later revealed that the vaccine does in fact affect menstrual cycles).
Sadly, this research will very likely never be reported on by mainstream news outlets and it will continue to be swept under the rug by public health organizations. Additionally, the CDC still officially recommends that pregnant women get the coronavirus vaccine.
2 notes · View notes
ausisthistrue · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
0 notes
immaculatasknight · 11 months
Link
Fly the social distanced skies
0 notes
shopwithmemama · 1 year
Link
1 note · View note
yorkiepop · 1 year
Text
Please watch and share!! Thank goodness for Bitchute.com
1 note · View note
airbrickwall · 2 years
Text
0 notes
americanmysticom · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
"Serious Vaccine Side-Effects Covered Up by Israeli Government, Leaked Video Reveals"
"The Israeli Ministry of Health caught lying and manipulating an expert report on adverse events"
Summary of key points
On August 2nd, the Israeli Ministry of Health (MOH) released a report on adverse events reported following vaccination from December 9th 2021-May 31st 2022 based on a new reporting system. The MOH tasked a team of medical researchers from Shamir Medical Center with experience in pharmacovigilance to analyze the data from the system. Here is a subtitled video with excerpts from the Zoom meeting on this issue.
The Israeli MOH subsequently misrepresented the findings stating that no new adverse events were found, there was no new signal, and the events were not necessarily caused by the vaccine, even though the researchers themselves said the exact opposite.
The Israeli MOH artificially minimized the extent of reporting by comparing the number of reports submitted during that period to a much larger number of vaccine doses administered over a longer period of time and a much larger population than the one reporting.
The Israeli MOH sat on these results for nearly two months and did not disclose them to the expert committee that met in late June to decide on recommending the vaccine for children under five.
There is much more to this story, so I recommend that you read the whole article. https://dailysceptic.org/2022/09/04/serious-vaccine-side-effects-covered-up-by-israeli-government-leaked-video-reveals/
https://mathewaldred.substack.com/p/the-israeli-ministry-of-health-caught?
see also; Exclusive: Proof that Israel found serious safety problems with the COVID vaccines then deliberately covered it up https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/exclusive-proof-that-the-top-israeli
https://rtmag.co.il/english/breaking-the-israeli-ministry-of-health-has-been-warned-it-might-open-itself-to-lawsuits-for-encouraging-the-public-to-get-vaccinated-while-claiming-that-the-covid-19-vaccine-is-safe,-and-that-side-effects-are-mild-and-transient
0 notes
iruur1 · 2 years
Text
Vaxx Increased Likelihood of Infections Right After the Shot
Vaxx Increased Likelihood of Infections Right After the Shot
Jerryred Published April 27, 2022 Shot-Induced COVID Waves: Increased Likelihood of ‘Unvaccinated’ Infections Right After the Shot https://rumble.com/embed/v102s1k/?pub=r41y5 Dr. Ryan Cole: “If you look at the curves in the world, every time the shot rollout happened, the COVID rate went up, because they didn’t count you as fully vaccinated until [2 weeks] after that second shot. So they didn’t…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
1 note · View note
is-the-owl-video-cute · 5 months
Text
i think the most annoying part of dog food discourse is how many people will act as though proplan/hill’s/Royal canin diets aren’t extremely and prohibitively expensive and that THAT is the reason so many people look into healthy alternatives.
People complain about corn being in the first five ingredients on most of those feeds because, regardless of other factors here, that is not an expensive ingredient. But it makes up a large chunk of the dry food. So the dry food should be fairly affordable, right?
Tumblr media
Oh… with tax you’re spending about $100 for one 45lb bag of food where the third ingredient is wheat and the fourth and fifth ingredients are corn.
Tumblr media
Oh… well! It’s slightly cheaper! But the second ingredient is rice, third is wheat, fourth is corn, and then fifth is poultry byproduct. None of those are very expensive so this just must be the low end cost of dog food unfortunately. The vets recommend it so surely that means prices aren’t inflated, right?
Tumblr media
Oh? This one has similar ingredients with the only real difference being no corn? And it’s half the price?? Well surely that’s just a fluke.
Tumblr media
Oh. Oh no.
Tumblr media
This one even has CORN in it and it’s $20 cheaper?? Wow!
Like listen at some point I don’t care if your dog food has the ichor of the gods in it, I’m not spending $100 every five days if there are cheaper options with just as many “good” ingredients in it. If you think I’m a dog abuser because I can’t afford this overpriced garbage, that’s too bad. I don’t care. My dogs are perfectly healthy with the food I give them. Great weight and great coat. People giving dog food recommendations that aren’t those top three hyper-expensive dog foods aren’t trying to epic own those dastardly vets half the time, but I really don’t blame the ones who do lose trust in vets when the only heartworm protection they recommend lately are expensive triple-action brands like Simparica Trio that costs $120+ as opposed to the other heartworm protections that are only about $40-$60 on average, which is still cheaper even if you add on a $20-$40 flea and tick protection separately, and only recommend dog food that costs $85+ a bag even if your dog doesn’t have specialized dietary needs.
Those top three foods are GREAT at making competent prescription diets, I don’t deny that. I do still have to criticize the pricing of those prescription diets though because I have spoken to DOZENS of people who had to pull their pets off of a prescription diet and struggle to find something comparable because they couldn’t afford the food, and that’s terrible! These are not poor companies! Purina, Royal Canin, and Hill’s can ABSOLUTELY afford to lower their prices to make their food accessible to people who need it for their animals but they don’t. They probably never will. Because at the core they are run by greedy corporations. It doesn’t matter how many good nutritionists are on board if the company is run by people who put profits over customers and make the food impossible for people to afford.
#I keep seeing posts from people on both sides of this#and it is frustrating to see how many vets don’t seem to acknowledge#that a MASSIVE part of the dog food debate has and always will be#the inaccessibility of these three brands#because whether corn is good or bad or neutral for a dog#It’s a cheap ingredient#any meat byproducts are a cheap ingredient#wheat in any form is a cheap ingredient#rice is a cheap ingredient#they aren’t putting Diamond dust and gold flakes in the kibble it’s very accessible and affordable ingredients for the most part#and many comparatively smaller companies use very similar ingredients and make food people can actually afford#So yeah when people look at these factors it does make them distrust vets who will almost exclusively push expensive brands#and that’s where the distrust is coming from#it’s not primarily smug tiktok kids who think they know everything#it’s just people who have less money than you and get treated like they care less for their animals because of it lol#and people who feel scammed because anything veterinary is already expensive to the point not everyone can afford it as regularly as needed#the fact people have to give pets vaccines themselves to make ends meet because most vets charge so much just to walk in the door#is a sign of a larger problem#I criticize people who avoid taking animals with surprise sickness or injuries to the vet#but it’s not exactly hard to see why that isn’t even an option for a lot of people#people can’t even afford surgery on themselves if they’re suddenly injured out of the blue in this country#So I can’t pretend to be shocked they don’t have $10k squirreled away if something unavoidable happens to a pet#no one is entitled to an animal they can’t afford yes yes but a routine vet visit shouldn’t be $600-$1000 per animal sorry#give me a copay or something
83 notes · View notes
ablogofcourage · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
70 notes · View notes
prolifeproliberty · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
(Link to the post on Project Veritas’ site)
“I hope we don’t find out that somehow this mRNA lingers in the body and like -- because it has to be affecting something hormonal to impact menstrual cycles,” he said.
“I hope we don’t discover something really bad down the line…If something were to happen downstream and it was, like, really bad? I mean, the scale of that scandal would be enormous.”
- Jordon Trishton Walker, Pfizer Director of Research and Development, Strategic Operations - mRNA Scientific Planner
103 notes · View notes
awesomecooperlove · 4 months
Text
🧑🏽‍⚕️👩🏼‍⚕️👨🏼‍⚕️
12 notes · View notes
americanmysticom · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
Promoting Unlicensed Vaccines is Lawbreaking Unlicensed healthcare products: No advertising or promotion allowed
it seems an appropriate time to review the law concerning marketing of unlicensed medical products.
As we barrel down the pike towards deployment and mandates (ironically after Labor day) involving yet more inadequately tested, Emergency Use Authorized genetic vaccine products (in other words, not licensed or market authorized), it seems an appropriate time to review the law concerning marketing of unlicensed medical products.
This is all about reducing the risk of hospitalization and death from Omicron BA.5, which (based on data from all over the world) appears to be most significant in the highly genetic “vaccinated” population.
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/promoting-unlicensed-vaccines-is?
[A previous vision, within the heart as a vessel, glowing with living sparkling multicolored and swirling light, a face discernible smiling gracefully yet indefinable; and on this day a waking dream; the face of a loved-one as peering through a veil, that loved-one now fully whole and complete, a living part of a greater whole, yet remaining herself clothed in greater enveloped loving wisdom grace.]
0 notes
kramlabs · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
75 notes · View notes