Tumgik
#societal constructs
blueheartbookclub · 2 months
Text
"Unraveling the Human Tapestry: Frank Hamel's 'Human Animals'—A Journey into the Complex Nature of Humanity"
Tumblr media
Frank Hamel's "Human Animals" is a thought-provoking exploration of the intricate interplay between our human nature and the animal instincts that reside within us. This fascinating journey into the realms of biology, psychology, and societal constructs unfolds with a narrative precision that both challenges and enlightens. The title itself serves as a prelude to a comprehensive examination of the dualities that define our existence—a title that hints at the untamed aspects of our being, waiting to be unraveled.
Published in [Year], "Human Animals" is a testament to Hamel's keen intellectual curiosity and his ability to distill complex concepts into a narrative accessible to a broad audience. The title alludes to the central theme—the recognition that beneath our veneer of civilization, there exists a primal essence shared with our fellow creatures in the animal kingdom.
Hamel's exploration begins with a scientific lens, dissecting the biological similarities between humans and other animals. The opening chapters lay the groundwork for understanding our shared ancestry, evolutionary traits, and the genetic links that bind us to the broader animal kingdom. The title "Human Animals" becomes a guide through this scientific inquiry, inviting readers to reconsider their perception of human uniqueness.
Beyond the biological, Hamel delves into the psychological dimensions of our shared humanity. He navigates the complexities of human behavior, emotions, and social structures, drawing connections between our actions and those observed in the animal world. The title encapsulates this psychological journey, suggesting that within our societal constructs, there exist primal instincts that shape our behaviors.
Hamel's writing is not merely an academic discourse; it is a bridge between the scientific and the philosophical. The narrative is enriched by anecdotes, case studies, and historical examples that add a human touch to the exploration. The title serves as a thematic compass, signaling to readers that they are embarking on a nuanced exploration of what it means to be human, entwined with our animalistic roots.
As the book progresses, Hamel ventures into the ethical considerations surrounding our treatment of animals and the environmental impact of human activities. The title becomes a poignant reminder of the responsibility we bear as stewards of the planet, urging readers to reflect on the consequences of our actions on the delicate balance of the natural world.
"Human Animals" is not just an examination of our shared biological heritage; it is a call to introspection and societal self-reflection. Hamel challenges preconceived notions, inviting readers to confront uncomfortable truths about the intersections of humanity and animality. The title, with its enigmatic allure, guides readers through a labyrinth of ethical contemplation.
In conclusion, "Human Animals" by Frank Hamel is a captivating exploration that transcends disciplinary boundaries. The title encapsulates the essence of the book—a multifaceted exploration of the intricate connections between humanity and the animal kingdom. Hamel's prose is engaging, his ideas are profound, and the title acts as an evocative portal into the depths of our shared nature. As readers journey through the pages, "Human Animals" leaves an indelible impression, challenging us to peel back the layers of societal conditioning and reevaluate our place within the vast tapestry of the natural world.
Frank Hamel's "Human Animals" is available in Amazon in paperback 15.99$ and hardcover 23.99$ editions.
Number of pages: 399
Language: English
Rating: 9/10                                           
Link of the book!
Review By: King's Cat
4 notes · View notes
blondefoxmedic · 1 year
Text
Just because you are aware of how constructed societal concepts are, doesn't mean you are free from the pressure of it. Being aware might grant some freedom, but it's not like the concepts just disappear no matter how silly they seem now. You just gotta be aware that it is not your fault they exist and that not you are the problem in the situation that hurts so many blindly. As a genderqueer person you have no choice but be aware of it, so the pain can become more visible, voicable. We do not have the comfort or privilege of blindness. But the privilege of truly fitting the set of unrealistic roles is bestowed on a very small amount of people. And the pressure lays on everyone outside. Now everyone who is visibly and openly breaking the gender binary, is questioning the chase for that unrealistic goal that media and society set for everyone by a tiny group of people. That is uncomfortable, that is angering those who are hurting by it but don't understand why. While those in power of those concepts are profiting to keep it in place and try to get rid of those not only questioning but actively disturbing it.
4 notes · View notes
blueheartbooks · 2 months
Text
"Unraveling the Human Tapestry: Frank Hamel's 'Human Animals'—A Journey into the Complex Nature of Humanity"
Tumblr media
Frank Hamel's "Human Animals" is a thought-provoking exploration of the intricate interplay between our human nature and the animal instincts that reside within us. This fascinating journey into the realms of biology, psychology, and societal constructs unfolds with a narrative precision that both challenges and enlightens. The title itself serves as a prelude to a comprehensive examination of the dualities that define our existence—a title that hints at the untamed aspects of our being, waiting to be unraveled.
Published in [Year], "Human Animals" is a testament to Hamel's keen intellectual curiosity and his ability to distill complex concepts into a narrative accessible to a broad audience. The title alludes to the central theme—the recognition that beneath our veneer of civilization, there exists a primal essence shared with our fellow creatures in the animal kingdom.
Hamel's exploration begins with a scientific lens, dissecting the biological similarities between humans and other animals. The opening chapters lay the groundwork for understanding our shared ancestry, evolutionary traits, and the genetic links that bind us to the broader animal kingdom. The title "Human Animals" becomes a guide through this scientific inquiry, inviting readers to reconsider their perception of human uniqueness.
Beyond the biological, Hamel delves into the psychological dimensions of our shared humanity. He navigates the complexities of human behavior, emotions, and social structures, drawing connections between our actions and those observed in the animal world. The title encapsulates this psychological journey, suggesting that within our societal constructs, there exist primal instincts that shape our behaviors.
Hamel's writing is not merely an academic discourse; it is a bridge between the scientific and the philosophical. The narrative is enriched by anecdotes, case studies, and historical examples that add a human touch to the exploration. The title serves as a thematic compass, signaling to readers that they are embarking on a nuanced exploration of what it means to be human, entwined with our animalistic roots.
As the book progresses, Hamel ventures into the ethical considerations surrounding our treatment of animals and the environmental impact of human activities. The title becomes a poignant reminder of the responsibility we bear as stewards of the planet, urging readers to reflect on the consequences of our actions on the delicate balance of the natural world.
"Human Animals" is not just an examination of our shared biological heritage; it is a call to introspection and societal self-reflection. Hamel challenges preconceived notions, inviting readers to confront uncomfortable truths about the intersections of humanity and animality. The title, with its enigmatic allure, guides readers through a labyrinth of ethical contemplation.
In conclusion, "Human Animals" by Frank Hamel is a captivating exploration that transcends disciplinary boundaries. The title encapsulates the essence of the book—a multifaceted exploration of the intricate connections between humanity and the animal kingdom. Hamel's prose is engaging, his ideas are profound, and the title acts as an evocative portal into the depths of our shared nature. As readers journey through the pages, "Human Animals" leaves an indelible impression, challenging us to peel back the layers of societal conditioning and reevaluate our place within the vast tapestry of the natural world.
Frank Hamel's "Human Animals" is available in Amazon in paperback 15.99$ and hardcover 23.99$ editions.
Number of pages: 399
Language: English
Rating: 9/10                                           
Link of the book!
Review By: King's Cat
0 notes
tuta-hua-saaz · 1 month
Text
Sleep has never been slept so hard I love sleeping so much
26 notes · View notes
verm1c1de · 5 months
Text
honestly now that i think about it efurry irken is purrobably a little a defective,,, just like how in catholicism efurryone is a little a sinful. i mean we dont even rlly know what the criteria fur defectivism is but that just feels like itd be true. that its not a black and white "mewre eifur defective or ur not" its a. some people just hide it better. yknow.that seems more realsitc,,,
45 notes · View notes
visenyaism · 8 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
OH IM GETTING IT NOW
41 notes · View notes
vikingnerd793 · 6 months
Text
Karlach is canonically bi/pan as she says some origin lines I believe about riding anything that breathes or something hilarious, and she says things about Halsin and others. HOWEVER, I always felt like Karlach was for the girlies a bit more. And, I love that Samantha/Sam (still figuring out what they prefer as their username on X says Samantha but lots call them Sam) played Karlach in a GNC way THAT ALSO centered women instead of the typical male centering...
I ended up feeling so represented by the fact there was no "sexy strong" forced femininity to Karlach's behavior ....Karlach was just Karlach. Gorgeous, hilarious, sweet Karlach. IMO, both femininity and masculinity and it doesn't matter the balance. Karlach just was.
20 notes · View notes
iron-sides · 3 months
Text
i do think pitch perfect is a great litmus test for. idk what actually but nothing about this is for men. at all. this is the 2010s version of the barbie movie but better because it doesnt need to sit you down and explain feminism to you like youre a baby
8 notes · View notes
ice-block · 1 year
Text
Ever since I took a gender studies class it has become so obvious how there are literally no differences between “male” and “female” other than gender presentation. Like. Half of cis men grow breasts, a decent amount get those breasts surgically removed, aka top surgery, if men having flat chests was the 100% only way for them to be, half wouldn’t need surgery to prove that. genitalia is literally the exact same components in a different order and I’m not kidding, every part can be found in people of all sexes, hormones are barely an indicator of anything, there are cis women with the same levels of testosterone or more as cis men, and there are cis men with comparable levels of estrogen. You can find men and women who have the same face shape, body shape, muscle mass, strength as people of the “opposite” gender. It’s actually insane how few components are needed for someone to have a “complete” gender transition (in the sense of like, hormones and top/bottom surgery, and disclaimer that trans people don’t require any of those things to be trans etc etc) not to say that enduring those things isn’t difficult but the sexual dimorphism is extremely small in humans. And now I feel insane whenever I see people saying “men are this” “women are that”. There literally isn’t a difference, any thing you think only women have or only men have is not exclusive
58 notes · View notes
rowanoftheunknown · 6 months
Text
I fucking hated the proposal actually
12 notes · View notes
dykekakashi · 5 months
Text
like this might make me sound very jaded tbh but having been in 2 relationships w aro and/or ace people it does feel like. for me romantic relationships seem to be defined more by the contractual expectations (generally just priority placement and access when it comes to physical or emotional intimacy) + its institutional pros/cons rather than like, the feelings involved. tbh i've had so many friendships that have been deeper and more involved in terms of feelings than actual relationships. and i get that this is like, a super subjective experience but sometimes i feel like, so bad for viewing it this way. like i was born unable to feel something that most people naturally can so i must be love-deficient in some way
7 notes · View notes
mariathechosen1 · 6 months
Text
It’s honestly so amazing to me how viewers sorta grow desensitized to certain types of sadness in storytelling and stop showing characters sympathy because of it.
A fictional character could explain to me how they watched their parents die when they were 10 and then later got adopted, only for their new adopted parents to be killed, and I’ll think ‘god, what a cliche’.
But then that same show could go “Hey, you know that one character you like? What if the other characters forgot his birthday?” And I’ll burst into tears.
7 notes · View notes
bodychanandbodykun · 1 year
Note
why are you naked?
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
24 notes · View notes
wachi-delectrico · 1 year
Text
Gonna get spicy for a second and say that everyone loves spewing hate about narcissistic (NPD) parents and how awful parents with personality disorders are, but if someone were to make a post with the exact same cadence about ADHD parents they'd get shot in public at first sight
#rambling#Lemme clarify and extend my point here (cos I feel ppl could really misinterpret this one)#Am I saying people should just accept the abuse of parents if said parents have a personality disorder? No#Am I saying people with ADHD parents have it worse or that both experiences are comparable and exactly the same? No#What I'm saying is that ppl are much more eager to call out abusive or neglectful behaviour from ppl w personality disorders bc#they're seen as 'scary' or 'monstrous' and inherently evil so they have no qualms going full force at it. They think -pd ppl are the devil#But adhd in ppl's general views could never be the source of such pain from a parent to a child; ADHD ppl are seen as childish#and harmless and clueless and silly and tbh a bit stupid. Besides they could never hurt a 'monster' by jumping the gun at -pd ppl right?#'normal people don't have personality disorders so this can't affect me! But normal people can have adhd!'#That's the core of my complaint: one is dehumanised as a destructive monster; the other is as an innocent victim child#And both (parent w -pd & w adhd) can be pretty bad in their own uniqie ways! But such a thing is never considered - for the#societal construct of the child - that neurodivergencies get pushed into - is of an untainted pure inherently clueless being below human#From my exp and the exp of other friends lemme say: having an adhd parent can suck so much ass! Lol#I grew up with two opposing ideals troubling my mind: my mothers obvious overwhelming love; and the shadow her constant absence cast#She loved me so much and did as much as she could; but constantly forgot about my care and my needs and made rash choices#I think about that more and more as i age; especially as i go to doctors over and over for problems i have had since forever#It is an awful feeling to have sink in your heart: how a parent's love isn't enough; how 'maturing quick' isn't a blessing but a curse#As i grew i stopped telling my mom about my needs my school things and my life bc i got used to her forgetfulness and lack of organisation#It meant irregular eating schedules & inadequate meals. In 5th grade I'd eat table scraps at school cos my mom couldn't remember#how I'd tell her over and over that the food had to be in a specific way or it'd get burnt in the school's oven#I'd go to the 'first' dr appointment to deal w an ongoing problem & then she'd forget to schedule the following ones#You get the idea#Kind of a weird post w a strange framing device but I've been thinking about it a lot lately. Smth triggered this thought last night#I'll also never forget a few months ago when i went go a specialist for my hEDS - told her I've known all my life but never got treatment#Also just. The crushing feeling of the dr saying ''you should've gotten your own med team to work ur case since u were young!'#And just. silently nodding & wanting to cry feeling validated but also so hurt looking @ the obvious neglect#Anyways hey how did this therapy session go Doctor
22 notes · View notes
majorarcanas · 6 hours
Text
Anyway. Sorry ive been having these thoughts but i saw something that pissed me off so i took it as opportunity to rant 🫡
3 notes · View notes
felinenthusiast · 6 months
Text
sigh. realising an understanding about one of my favourite characters of all time has just greatly shifted. i need to reconfigure my entire brain because this character has changed sexual orientation to me lol
#rambles#i wanted him to be. bisexual. like me. and it was the obvious choice considering the fact he's literally been married to women. twice.#but i just... his first marriage canonically just 'happened' to him before he knew it based on societal expectations#like we dont know much other than it's described as just. occurring before he knew it. in a very passive way.#so i like to think they WERE friends and it was a nice relationship. but um. i truly do not believe there was any romance there.#his second marriage was literally a political marriage to keep him tethered to a company... he canonically feels no love towards her.#(also. im deeply defensive of female characters who are hit with the 'abusive' accusation out of nowhere it happens too much and is levelle#very incorrectly i'd say like. 60% of the time. but this woman IS genuinely abusive to him. first emotionally. then she beats him later :|#so great marriage that one was! yikes!)#then his (MALE) coworker corners him in the bathroom and he immediately interprets it gayly and can respond like#'this was going to happen sooner or later' <- real quote.#and he's nervous but down for the gay scenario he's constructed in his head (it's not actually gay.)#and then also. he goes on to have Even More intense homoeroticism with a completely different man.#like Oh. babygirl you are a deeply closeted gay man. i understand now.#im sorry mr osawa.#Sorry im rambling about things no o e cares about also.#im obvs thinking of a specific character but also like. im sure others have had this experience#when you're the ceo of a character (me and my partner are largely cus he doesn't have any other big fans lol) and your understanding shifts
5 notes · View notes