TAGS UPDATE: aaron bushmell(may he rest in piece) is 5th on trending. keep spreading his name. make everyone know him
also egypt is 7th on trending and scottland is at 8th
ignore this post. page refreshed right after(maybe @ ing staff works idk)
DON'T STOP TALKING ABOUT PALESTINE
347 notes
·
View notes
Ruin My Life
For every note after I’ve hit a number, I’ll do that task for a MONTH per note. So if I have 15 notes, I’ll keep my nails painted for 10 months and wont cut my hair for 5 months. No time limit, spamming encouraged :)
- 5 notes: Keep my nails painted
- 10 notes: Stop Cutting my Hair
- 20 notes: Cum only from a toy or dick in my cunt
- 50 notes: Drop Out of Uni and won’t go back
- 75 notes: Keep my cunt shaved
- 100 notes: Only wear girly underwear
- 100 note BONUS: I’ll put my deadname real name on my blog
- 110 notes: Post detrans/porn audios on my blog
- 115 notes: Use my girl voice 24/7
- 150 notes: Stop Taking T
978 notes
·
View notes
honestly a little bit envious of people who will discover good omens in like 15 years as some fun little weird older show. somehow this feels like the natural state of good omens to me. it’s the way i discovered the book and i want that for future people with the tv show too
632 notes
·
View notes
Relationships don't have to be transactional. They don't even have to be 50/50. The idea that a "good relationship" is split down the middle, where nobody acts like people, and instead vends out appropriate cookie-cutter responses and dialogue is genuinely harmful.
A good relationship is one wherein the person/people involved are happy. You don't have to give, you don't have to take. You can enjoy each other's company and be together. If there comes a time when that need changes, then the person who should know is whomever is in that relationship with you. This isn't solely about romantic or sexual partners, this goes for platonic friends or otherwise anybody who spends enough time with each other to establish some type of relationship with each other.
458 notes
·
View notes
first post I've seen that's got me genuinely interested in leverage... do you think I'd like it
HMMM I THINK IT DEPENDS. i can wholeheartedly recommend it as a pretty leftist show about insane characters being insane and maladaptive, the slowest-burn polyamory i've ever seen, character dynamics off the CHARTS, super clever writing, incredibly done arcs, and episodes that all feel fresh and important despite also being semi-formulaic (the vast majority focus on one heist of the week, robbing one shitty rich person).
my one caveat is that one of the main characters is ex-US-military and gets in his feelings about it and there's some pro-military messaging and occasional imperialism-related jokes that make me cringe hard. it's not unexpected for an american TV show from 2008 and it's certainly not as relentless/overt as with a lot of other shows from the same time period (it's not even relevant in the majority of episodes), but like...... i know that This In Specific Is A Personal Turnoff so i wouldn't rec the show without mentioning it.
amazingly though, that's the Only major criticism i have of the show. (not counting occasional minor quibbles with individual episodes -- again, none of which i dislike at all.) overall every single plot is about finding a new completely fucking evil rich person modeled off of real life completely fucking evil rich people, and terrorizing them not just financially but also psychologically. the team Breaks their targets of the week. they don't do murder, but mostly Because their focus is on ruining these people's lives and making them Sit In It. instead of getting the mercy of dying.
so like, power fantasies about taking down corrupt politicians, oil barons, fascists, mega-corporations, wellness influencers, and more, all while creating entertaining satirical caricatures of the Worst People On This Earth. in this, and in the characters being SO FUCKING CRAZY, i think you would have a Great time.
191 notes
·
View notes
i always see people saying that Witchers would be accosted by bards and performers when they went anywhere near the college and listen. as a zoologist and ecologist, i need to let you know who the real hardcore fanboys would be
naturalists
those poor monster hunters would never know a moment of fucking peace the second they got close to that campus. oh you know about the in-depth behaviour, anatomy, ecology, locality of the magical beasties? oh you clear the particularly disruptive ones out of the ecosystem? my god it would never end. annual faculty meetings would be like “for the 5th time in a fucking row: no. we’re not budgeting for you to hire a witcher for field trips. i don’t care if you get eaten by something. i know damn well what the game plan is here.”
238 notes
·
View notes
People who compare transition to self harm or use real people they know who've self-harmed as a metaphorical comparison to transitioning aren't making the gotcha they think they're making - they're just showing that they don't have the compassion or maturity to engage with either topic at even a conversational level.
And, frankly, it's infuriating as a person who does see those who self-harm as my equal who doesn't need to be used as a cudgel against another group of often vulnerable people.
90 notes
·
View notes