Tumgik
#religious dogma
Text
Tumblr media
"To 'choose' dogma and faith over doubt and experience is to throw out the ripening vintage and to reach greedily for the Kool-Aid." -- Christopher Hitchens
21 notes · View notes
riosid · 1 year
Text
Any parent who subject's their child to the thought that they are born in sin is abusing their child mentally. if they genuinely believe what they preach, they are still enabling abuse unconsciously. Religious trauma is real and Abrahamic religion are inherently abusive and traumatic.
18 notes · View notes
Text
I don’t normally post stuff like this. But it’s been a couple hours and I’m still damn baffled. My husband and I were coming home from work when we ran across a very.. strange.. scene.
First, we saw a sign. It said something about hell. Since this abortion ban shit has been going on, I very much roll my eyes about religious dogma bullshit. But still, I’m interested to see what fucking bullshit the crazy Christian’s have came up with this time. Just to clarify, I don’t dislike all Christian’s. Just the ones who are ridiculously conservative.
Just a few feet away, there was Jesus on his knees meanwhile a man in gold armor is whooping Jesus’s with a whip. Roman centurion vs Jesus I’m assuming. Clearly the centurion is winning this round.
Still baffled. And I was so shocked by the scene, I’ve forgotten what the sign I saw originally even said.
2 notes · View notes
oh-dear-so-queer · 5 months
Text
From his genetic hypothesis of homosexuality he inferred that homosexuals ought not to be discriminated against "on the basis of a religious dogma supported by the unlikely assumption that they are biologically unnatural."
"In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity" - Daniel J. Kevles
0 notes
nando161mando · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
360 notes · View notes
helloyesamwoman · 4 months
Text
Blasphemy
Tumblr media
123 notes · View notes
annasinthewalls · 1 year
Text
Oppressive religious dogma is like the instinct of some animals to eat their young in an attempt to protect them. You will destroy the parts of your children that you fear they would be divinely punished for. But in the end they are still destroyed.
218 notes · View notes
charmophron · 23 days
Text
thinking about how fatphobia has dug its claws so deeply into my mother
that she cant see it in herself and has instead combined it with wellness guru advice to remove Harmful foods until shes having one tiny meal a day and insisting shes just not hungry!!! mostly drinking wine and being so proud of herself for only nibbling on some cheese amongst her piles of weird ~ natural ~ powders and colloidal silver water and not considering it disordered eating that she's talked herself into... just cant believe her that its about the Health Benefits while shes also smoking cigarettes lots...
wish this was new behaviour but truly its just gotten worse and more self justified the older shes getting
12 notes · View notes
kalopsic-lagomorph · 7 months
Text
gamzee was so silly and chill at first. Shame about the. Serial. Killing.
38 notes · View notes
ladsofsorrow24 · 1 year
Text
if we're really going full blown religious imagery here, rem's actually pretty correct on knives and vash being angels because if it wasn't for the independents, humanity will never truly be able to communicate with plants
yes independents might be "useless" when it comes to producing any kind of important resources, but them being able to exist like humans yet still interlinked with the other plants' conscious is truly something revolutionary when it comes to humans-plants communication
heck, independents being born might actually be from the plants' collective desire to communicate with humans, their creator but also the one who ended up exploiting them
so it's not so much as independence meaning total annihilation of other species, but more so independence in a sense of giving them a voice to tell their truths
60 notes · View notes
Tumblr media
77 notes · View notes
anarchonist · 1 year
Text
I really need liberals and other non-violence advocates to understand the main problem with their position on non-violence: proclaiming that you're never going to resort to violence is an invitation for violent people to escalate their violence against you or the people you claim to defend.
Moralizing people for not being 100 % openly and proudly anti-violence is not only a tone-deaf, but an actively dangerous thing to do. A person might in their heart of hearts be fully against violence of any kind, but by trying to get them to openly assume a hard pacifist stance in order to claim some intangible moral high ground, you are putting them in a dangerous position: now fascists and bullies will assume that the person is an easy target.
It's a tough pill to swallow for the "marketplace of ideas" crowd, but people don't always treat you the same way you treat them. You assume that if you openly declare your intention to not resort to violence under any circumstances, your opponent will automatically respect that - or if they don't, there will be some kind of consequence from above. From authorities, from the public, hell, from God himself. But that isn't a given. What you're doing is throwing yourself at the opponent's mercy and telling them to do whatever they like. You're assuming a lot about their humanity, which might not even exist.
And that's what this is about. When I keep saying that violence is the only language fascists and bullies understand, it isn't out of some deep immoral desire to hurt people and just trying to find "acceptable targets". It's not even always about the violence against fascists itself. It's about keeping that threat looming, keeping the people who would like nothing more than to hurt you guessing: "If I start escalating violence against this person, will they fight back? Perhaps I shouldn't risk it, I could get hurt. And violence is only fun when it's one-sided in my favor."
Violence is ugly. Violence is brutal. Violence causes damage that may never heal. You maybe shouldn't find violence in itself fun - if you do, then you might be close to the kind of person who's just looking for an acceptable target (like fascists are) - but violence is sometimes necessary. And since fascists, like all bullies, are cowards, even the slightest chance that they might get hurt themselves might deter them, might keep them from more violence.
So no, proclamations of non-violence do not help in deescalating violence, they do the opposite. They are an incredibly dangerous thing to do when confronted with violent fascists who would like nothing better than having a non-resistant punching bag. You do not even always have to openly assume a pro-violence stance, sometimes simply keeping the bully in the dark about whether or not you're going to fight back might make them hesitate.
97 notes · View notes
Text
Day 23
Hobbies
Tumblr media
Eclaire is fond of making things, especially textile crafts, clothes, and food.
Tumblr media
She's nowhere near an expert in any of it but she's doing well enough to make pretty wearable outfits and tasty meals. Her absolute favorite things to make are traditional coerthan pastries.
Also old habits die hard and she's still committing tax fraud for fun, like she did ever since first setting foot into Limsa Lominsa. (bonding experience with Tataru when she joined the Scions probably)
35 notes · View notes
dilfdarthvader · 11 months
Text
returning from whatever impromptu hiatus I've been on to drop this meme and bounce
Tumblr media
47 notes · View notes
nando161mando · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
157 notes · View notes
attonrand · 4 months
Text
One time when I was teaching Sunday school, one of my students asked me if god was a man or a woman. Before I could even answer, one of my other kids says in the most bossy little girl voice you could imagine:
“Um, god is gender neutral, James.”
15 notes · View notes