Tumgik
#i support redhead erasure
koriandrsgar · 3 years
Text
not women on twitter crying about red head erasure when they know damn well they got their hair color at sallys for $7.99 stffhhdbifgh with ya gingerfishin ass.
Tumblr media
49 notes · View notes
battlestar-royco · 5 years
Note
Me and my friends decided to take a stand about the whole Halle Bailey thing, and I made a long post about why she's welcome as the new Ariel and how all the arguments ("redheads need representation", "science says..." and such) make no sense. But then there's "instead of the backwash of white characters, they should have made a new movie, maybe about an African folktale". For some reason it feels like the ugliest. But not being black, I can't get my head on why. Still the hardest to deny, tho.
For some reason racism, the people who are arguing for an African black princess don’t really strike me as A, the same people who were outraged at castings such as Sc/arJo’s Ghost in the Shell or B, the same people who would even show up to the theater to watch an African princess movie. They just say that so they can pretend they would support a black woman in the world in which they imagine her to belong (and this gets into the erasure of American and European black people as well). Really, I wouldn’t be surprised if these African princess advocates turned around and said “that kind of movie isn’t relatable/interesting” when the time comes to actually watch it. Just say you only want to watch white princesses and go. Also I guess we’re just going to pretend that black Danish people and black redheads aren’t real (think Enfys Nest or lol the existence of wigs and hair dye) and that white redheads Dana Scully don’t Sansa Stark have Ginny Weasley iconic Lydia Martin mainstream Mary Jane Watson representation Max Mayfield?
People’s imaginations are so limited. Why not both a black Ariel and an African fairy tale adaptation in two separate movies? If white girls get to have like seven princesses from different parts of Europe, why do girls of color have to be represented by only one princess for an entire region of the world? Many of us grew up hating the movies that were supposed to “represent” us (ie Aladdin, Pocahontas, PatF) because they were so problematic and unrepresentative of our lives and cultures and what we want from a princess movie. I’ve been wanting an African fairy tale princess for years now. White princesses get to have fantasy landscapes with fun dreamlike romances and sidekicks while princesses of color have to work within the confines of our world in tortured scenarios. Girls of color exist in France, Denmark, England, and all the other European countries Disney bases their movies on, but they just get erased. It’s about time that stopped.
34 notes · View notes
bat-lings · 5 years
Text
Reactions to this & this
Tumblr media
Heh, not preboot Babs for sure.
She was obviously targeted at a different public. Aging her down, making her lighter hearted and perky, even the new outfit is cute and "youngerish". I feel you, it’s hard for us fans who loved preboot Babs to get behind the new one. It’s a writing that would fit Steph a lot more, even though I never saw Steph get drunk or burn down flats, it’s a new characterization that would’ve felt less... blatantly out-of-place, than with Babs. Total marketing move. But hey, if new fans are lovin’ it, it’s cool. Again the series seems a lot funnier than watching the batboys beating the shit out of each other.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Saaaame
I think the reason is purely business in the context of a reboot supposed to bring a wider public. Dick is super well known outside of the "comic geeks" public both as Robin and Nightwing. He sells even to people who don’t know a lot about comics yet. They can have him in a Nightwing series, or take risks by making him something new like Agent 37, while having another Robin.
But for someone who’s not super familiar with comics, Batgirl is that redhead girl. Most non-comic readers don’t even know there’s other batgirls. Even her new characterization is super studied to appeal to new readers. If you’re gonna aim a new batgirl solo at a new public, using Barbara is the less risky and most lucrative option. And it’s maybe not in your best interests to promote other batgirls in other medias, hence Steph and Cass being Spoiler and Orphan in YJ even though Babs is Oracle...
Basically it’s "most appealing characterization" + "most well known batgirl" = $$$ independently of whether the two fit.
So yeah, it’s not fair, especially DC’s blatant erasure of Babs’ and Cass’ relationship. But with Barbara’s new characterization, she can’t take the same nurturing role she did in preboot. No excuse for how DC failed to install anything solid between Steph, Babs & Cass yet are trying so hard to sell us the batbros vibe.
It’s... one of the problems I have with reboot tbh. Of course they need to gather new readers and new clients, of course they need to make marketing & business decisions to ensure DC’s survival. But come on, most of reboot’s decisions was made in blatant disregard to what old fans could want. People who allowed DC’s survival till then. Plus business decisions should support the genuine creative intent, which seems to be a bit lacking. Don’t tell me a writer that has to rely on empty violence all the time is inspired. There’s very little balance in the overall decision-making process.
4 notes · View notes
sniperct · 7 years
Text
in a fandom I’m in I’ve been seeing shippers of a m/m ship taunting shippers of a f/f ship with comments about it looking more canon
and like
aside from eating our own, this is also a textbook case of femslash erasure
14 notes · View notes
deeeepsteep · 6 years
Photo
Tumblr media
Heyooooo IT’S RANT TIME
So apparently back in 2003 Roberto Aguirre-Sacasa wrote a play about Archie coming out as gay and Riverdale coping with the news, but Archie Comics threatened a cease and desist if the play followed through because apparently a universe where Archie being gay would “dilute and tarnish his image” lmao
RAS was forced to change the play so that none of the Archie characters were involved
Like okay, I get that the whole gist of Archie Andrews is that he’s supposed to be “America’s typical teenager” - but it’s fucking 2017, there is no one solid definition of what a “typical teenager” looks like and tbh there probably never was
What exactly is a “typical” teenager???? What are they supposed to look like??? There are billions of teenagers in the United States alone and you’re telling me a gay teenager isn’t “typical”??? What kind of message are you sending out to your fans - especially the younger ones - when you censor stuff like this? You’re essentially telling them that being gay isn’t typical, it isn’t normal
“But Kevin Keller’s gay!! Toni Topaz is bisexual!!” Yeah but they’re also side characters - they don’t get as much airtime as Archie or Veronica or Reggie or any of the characters that more people are familiar with lmao like I’m pretty sure a good bulk of the Riverdale fandom had no idea that Toni was originally from the comic books until they looked her up themselves
And don’t even get me started on Riverdale’s ace erasure with Jughead - I’m not the biggest fan of Cole Sprouse but I had so much respect for him when he tried to argue for Jughead’s asexuality in the beginning
As someone who identifies as asexual, someone who considers themselves a part of the LGBTQA+ community, I believe it’s so so important to have that kind of representation because guess what - there’s no such thing as a “typical teenager” - insisting that there IS a single image of what a teenager is expected to look and act like is stupid and old-fashioned and just all around terrible
We are all different and there’s nothing wrong with that - and especially for teenagers, that can be a tough concept to grasp because it’s fucking hard being a teenager lmao you’re given so many expectations, so many rules as to what you can and can’t do, and you’re just living in such a confusing time when you’re trying to figure things out for yourself and who you are and who you want to be for the rest of your life…and when you get shit like this, it’s just telling LGBTQA+ teenagers that they shouldn’t accept this part of themselves, that it’s wrong, that it’s not “normal”
“But having Archie as straight IS typical, because there are more straight people than gay people!!!” I hope y’all know that there is absolutely no way you can accurately prove that - there are many places around the world where people have to pretend they’re straight because hey guess what people can fucking get hurt, kicked out of their house/family, or even killed for being anything BUT heterosexual!!!! People are fearing for their lives simply because the place they’re currently living in doesn’t want to accept them for who they are, and that’s really shitty!!! It’s just really sad and heartbreaking to know that there are people out there who are unable to freely and openly express themselves because they’re afraid of being persecuted!!!!!!! There are places out there that force people to stay in the closet because their safety and their lives are at risk!!!!! So don’t even try and tell me that there are more straight people than LGBTQA+ people out there lmao because I will shut you down so fast your goddamn head will spin for a week
And even if it were true, why would people be so against having more LGBTQA+ representation anyway? It’s not like these people don’t exist, because they definitely fucking do lmao and having that kind of representation, having someone on screen that a gay kid can look at and say “Hey, they’re like me” - that means everything!!! It’s validation!! It’s acknowledgement that people like them exist and it’s such a good and wholesome feeling and everyone should be entitled to it!! 
There’s this thing called heteronormativity where we’ve been raised in a society that believes being heterosexual is the norm, that it’s “typical”, that it’s the only accepted lifestyle - and so we are led to believe that there are more straight people because that’s just the way it’s supposed to be - BUT IT’S NOT!! 
Why not have a universe in Archie Comics where Archie’s gay??? Why not have one of America’s most iconic fictional characters show that there are different depictions of a typical American teenager??? Why not???????
LGBTQA+ kids shouldn’t be subjected to just being the supporting character or a 3-episode story arc lmao they deserve to be presented front and centre just like their het cis counterparts
Archie can still be the bumbling, guitar-strumming, football-playing, hormone-ridden redhead that America knows and loves - he can still be Archie fucking Andrews, it’s just that he’s into dudes!!! Why does it have to be considered such a big risk?? Why is the inclusion of non-hetero characters so dangerous and taboo, especially now in an age where we have become so much more accepting and tolerable of different kinds of people??? It shouldn’t even BE considered a risk anymore like holy shit having something else that DOESN’T have cis white het dudes in it should be allowed to exist and trust me there is a market for it!! There are people who CRAVE for something different and they will wholeheartedly support it if done correctly!!!
I shit on RAS all the time for queerbaiting in both the Archie Comics and Riverdale, but after learning this bit of information I’m now realizing that maybe it’s more Archie Comics (And of course The CW but we all know that The CW is shitty when it comes to LGBTQA+ representation) that’s preventing the fair representation that so many people deserve
I mean he’s not wholly innocent but this definitely adds another side to the story
But yeah c’mon this was a dick move Archie Comics
124 notes · View notes
maliasass · 7 years
Note
hey! why don't you like rverdale? or malisaac (i'm not sure f you don't like it but i saw something on ur scal!a post that hinted at it)
fair warning, my salt levels are unusually high tonight…
why do i hate rverdale? because i thought we left the whole “two straight girls kiss each other on the lips but in a totally platonic way and both of them are still straight and definitely dont like girsl lol!!!!!!!” trope in 2016. id like that trope to burn in hell and never show up again thanks.
also, the fact that said f/f kiss was in a bunch of the promos for the show before it started airing with no context (meanwhile writers have confirmed that the two characters will never be in a romatic relationship)? Give me a queer! Give me a bait! What’s that spell? Look up queerbaiting in a dictionary and you’ll find a rverdale screenshot! (itbugs me extra bc i feel like tumblr in general has largely adopted the attitude that queerbaiting is super shitty and stopped watching shows like sherlock and supernatural and started calling them out, so like why are we all supporting this shit? is it because straight tumblr cares way more about m/m relationships than f/f ones??)
that’s what makes me, as a lesbian, the most angry, but wait, theres more: if you watch rverdale you can also enjoy an unecessary student/teacher relationship (like M@rrish but worse!), the super stereotypical gay best friend trope (another trope that id hoped we left in 2016 bc it can also burn in hell), and the erasure of a character’s canon asexuality (i’ll take yikes for 500)!
so yeah i still love all my mutuals who watch it but everytime i see it on my dash i loose 5 years of my life (also pls people comparing that one redheaded chick to queen lydia martin? whatre you doing lydia would whoop her ass)
as far as malisac, i dont really like have a strong reason that i dislike it. i just have a personal vendetta against it. Mostly bc its one of those ships where people are like oh shit we have a single girl lets find a nice single guy to pair her with! Even if theyve literally never interacted!! Bc heteros!! (And also bc obviously everyone needs to date!!) Like I hate it when m/f (or m/m) ships that have literally never once interacted in canon or even been in the same place at the same time get more attention than f/f ships who have had tons of interactions that could easily be seen as romantic (im looking at you, foxhole court fandom). Just in general that makes me super bitter. Like why ship Malia with Isaac of all people? Why not Kira or Lydia or Tracy or Braeden etc?
so yeah theres nothing wrong with the ship and i still love people who ship it (@fer) but it fuels my gay rage
anyway i hope you all enjoyed that whopping glass of hatorade 
10 notes · View notes
weekendwarriorblog · 3 years
Text
The Weekend Warrior 6/18/2021 - THE HITMAN’S WIFE’S BODYGUARD, THE SPARKS BROTHERS, LUCA, 12 MIGHTY ORPHANS, FATHERHOOD, RITA MORENO and More!
Well, it’s another week and another column and now I’m not only trying to stay on top of Emmy stuff for Below the Line, but I’m also desperately trying to see stuff for the 20th Tribeca Festival AND still having time to watch stuff for the column. As Nancy Meyers might say, “Something’s Gotta Give.” (Well, maybe she said it when someone asked her the title of her next movie in 2002. Shut up.)
Tumblr media
But first, this week’s “The Chosen One” and how could it be anything but Edgar Wright’s THE SPARKS BROTHERS (Focus Features), which I’ve now seen three times maybe?
To talk about Sparks, you almost have to remember the first time you heard of Sparks, and for me, it was in the early ‘80s when I was getting hipper into music and record collecting, and I’d see the covers of their records with their punny titles and be like, “What is this?” But those covers also scared me in some ways. Oddly, the “alternative rock” station WLIR should have been playing the hell out of Sparks in the ‘80s but other than “Cool Places,” their duet with the Go-Go’s Jane Wiedlin, they went mostly ignored.
It wasn’t until I saw them on Saturday Night Live performing “Mickey Mouse,” and I was immediately fascinated by keyboard player Ron Mael’s stage presence, standing completely still and stoic while his brother Russell pranced around the stage like a true rock star. Over the years, I heard covers by bands like the Dirtbombs and the Dresden Dolls, but it wasn’t until I watched the movie did I realize the influence they had on early new wave bands like Duran Duran, Erasure and Depeche Mode.
In many ways, there’s no one more perfect to direct this documentary other than Wright, since the Maels have been so influenced by cinema and their work with auteur filmmakers, some endeavors more successful than others. And then of course, Wright, has this amazing encyclopedic knowledge of music, as well as being so connected to that world that he can get the likes of Beck and Flea and others to go on camera to talk about the band. This is one case where the veritable Who’s Who *IS* a veritable Who’s Who. The number of actors and artists who come forward to share their stories about Sparks is quite amazing to the point where there’s almost a “Holy shit!” moment every couple minutes. “There’s two of New Order! And two of Duran Duran!” (Is there ANYONE Edgar DOESN’T know?)
More importantly, he gets Ron and Russ to talk at length about their entire career, almost album by album -- and they’ve made 25 of them! -- and it even covers the band’s leaner years in the 90s
All the interviews are done in black and white, almost as the perfect contrast to the colorful stories they tell and the similarly colorful music videos that punctuate those stories.
I mean, if Wright was writing a thesis paper on the influence and reach of Sparks, then he’d get an “A.” But then that still bodes the question: Are Sparks loved because their songs can be weird or have such a strange sense of humor? Well, They Might Be Giants, probably one of the most obvious influences, has never mentioned Sparks’ influence before, as far as I know, although, they, too, win over fans with the charm of their humorous songs. Even when you think of other groups of two members like the Black Keys, Sparks were doing that first, as well.
I couldn’t tell you if The Sparks Brothers will turn the brothers Mael into the global superstars selling out stadiums they’ve deserved to be for many years, but I know it’s going to be a LOT tougher to get tickets to see them the next time they tour between this and Leos Carax’s Spark-written musical Annette later this summer. Wright’s documentary is the definition of comprehensive.
I’m honestly not 100% sure how wide Focus Features is releasing this movie, but I figure it will be in 500 or 600 theaters, which would be a great way to get word out about the band. I’d love to see Wright’s fans go out to see it and for it to make a million or two this weekend, as that wouldn’t be bad for any documentary, especially with so many going straight to streaming these days.
Tumblr media
Let’s get to the single wide release of the week, which opened on Wednesday (something I completely forgot), and it’s THE HITMAN’S WIFE’S BODYGUARD (Lionsgate), the reunion of Samuel L. Jackson (as the hitman), Ryan Reynolds (as the bodyguard) and Salma Hayek (as the hitman’s wife). See how all of that works? The action-comedy sequel hopes to capitalize on the success of the first movie, which was #1 for an amazing three weeks in the late summer of 2017, grossing $75 million in North America alone.
The sequel opens at a very different time when a $21.4 million opening (like the original movie) wouldn’t be bad, but can THWB make that much at a time when people are being very precious about what they see in theaters? At least this one, unlike last week’s In the Heights -- which made less than half what I predicted -- is not debuting on streamers so if anyone wants to see it, they will have to go out to theaters, but why would they want to see it?
I already reviewed this at Below the Line, and I guess I liked it more than a lot of critics, because it’s currently at 30% on Rotten Tomatoes, which is very, VERY bad. That’s an even lower rating than Samuel L. Jackson’s last movie with Lionsgate, the horror sequel Spiral: From the Book of Saw, which bombed last month, opening with less than $9 million. So yeah, people may not rush out to see it for Jackson, but it’s been a very long time since there was a movie from Ryan Reynolds, and he’s definitely more of an A-lister thanks to the Deadpool movies. In fact, it’s been two full years since Reynolds was in Detective Pikachu, which grossed $144 million domestically, mostly with his voice role. Reynolds also provided a voice in The Croods: A New Age, one of the first movies to open theatrically during the pandemic that grossed $58 million.
It’s really hard to gauge how THWB will do under pandemic rules, even as places like New York City have thrown off all COVID limitations, so that theaters should be allowed to be full again? Will that matter? After the last few weeks, I feel like I should go lower on this one, closer to $15 to 17 million. I’m not sure if most people will even realize this opened Wednesday, but people are still figuring things out, and I’m not sure the original movie is as beloved as three times at #1 might convey.
Tumblr media
Also expanding nationwide into about 800 theaters is 12 MIGHTY ORPHANS (Sony Pictures Classics), which I wrote a little about last week when it opened in 120 Texas theaters, although I hadn’t actually seen it at that time. Well, I’ve seen it, and I have to say that it’s a perfectly pleasant period underdog story that I actually enjoyed more than George Clooney’s wacky Leatherheads, which is set around the same period.
Again, it’s not a particularly groundbreaking story, showing how Luke Wilson’s Rusty Russell takes a rag-tag group of orphans from the Masonic Home orphanage in Fort Worth, Texas, and not only teaches them how to read and do math but also how to play football in the early days when very few of the current plays existed. If you’ve seen any of these types of movies before, then you probably already know how it plays out, and though I try not to be cynical, especially with the over-the-top villainy of Wayne Knight’s cricket-bat wielding abuser, I do think this offers one of Wilson’s better performances, and I enjoyed seeing Martin Sheen in a strong supporting role as well.
Even knowing full well that most of the conflicts the team faces will probably be the kind of “5-minute drama” that will be resolved soon enough, it’s still enjoyable to watch such an inspirational story that one can probably forgive some of the cliches of the genre that keeps the film’s last act from elevating itself above the obviousness last act. (When it decides to show what happened to every single person in the movie during the end credits, you could hear the sound of my eyes rolling.) This might appeal to those looking for something a little less snarky or cynical at a time when that’s the norm, but true cinephiles will rightfully snub their nose at those cliches, because this feels like one of those sports movies that tries to win audiences over by not veering too far from what has worked previously.
Even expanding into 800 theaters this Friday, I’m not sure 12 Mighty Orphans will make more than a half million this weekend.
Tumblr media
Pixar Animation Studios releases its latest offering LUCA (Disney/Pixar) onto Disney+ and into one single L.A. theater. It’s the first feature film from Enrico Casarosa, who directed the Oscar-nominated short, La Luna, and I wish I liked it more than I did. It centers around a young sea monster named Luca (voiced by Jacob Tremblay), who discovers that he can pass off as human when he surfaces from his deep-sea home. He makes a friend with another sea monster named Antonio (Jack Dylan Grazer) and the two of them go off on a quest to find a Vespa, because that is their obsession. Along the way, they meet a spunky redhead girl named Giulia (Emma Berman), and they decide to take part in a race that can win them the money they need for that Vespa. That’s it. That’s the plot.
Honestly, I have no idea what my fellow critics and other movie enthusiasts are seeing in this movie, because it reminded me of a very bad Roberto Benigni movie with these American actors breaking out into bad Italian accents or phony Italian every few minutes. It’s obvious the movie’s director is from Italy and some have even called this movie a “love letter to Italy,” which makes you wonder why he would want to have these kid actors doing inappropriate takes on Italians by throwing in random Italian words but mostly speaking in English. It was really hard to get past, and it distracted me from enjoying it. I just didn’t really care for any of the characters at all. Giulia, while fun at first, just gets annoying, because she’s such a spaz.
The animation also wasn’t particularly impressive, seeming very cartoonish -- yes, I know it’s a cartoon -- but it just shows how hard it is to have humans star in an animated movie, because you really have to work harder on the characterization than what has clearly been done here. Because of this, Luca lacks much of what made Soul and other Pixar movies so special, as it’s just a kids’ adventure movie with the flimsiest literal fish-out-of-water premise with very little in terms of jokes, so it relies on physical humor and the idea that the boys need to hide their seamonster-ness from the naties. Even the presence of the genuinely funny Maya Rudolph and Jim Gaffigan voicing Luca’s parents do very little to save the movie. It just seems to be throwing everything but the kitchen sink at the viewer to make up for the weak characters.
This is one of the first true disappointments from Pixar, maybe my least favorite movie the company has made since Coco, which won the Oscar and had people falling over each other to praise it. Casarosa’s short was really wonderful, but this is just not a very good feature, and I honestly don’t know who this was meant for. It’s not particularly funny or moving or anything. It’s just a very basic watered-down premise that goes nowhere. Skip this and get your kids to watch a Fellini movie instead.
Tumblr media
Streaming on Netflix Friday is Kevin Hart’s new comedy, FATHERHOOD (Netflix), which was originally produced by Sony PIctures, but then like so many other movies, it got sold off to Netflix for streaming. It kind of makes sense, since Hart has been a regular brand on the streamer. Adapted from Matthew Logelin’s book, Two Kisses for Maddy: A Memoir of Love & Love, the movie is co-written and directed by the great Paul Weitz, and it co-stars Alfre Woodard, Lil Rel Howery, DeWanda Wise, Anthony Carrigan, Melody Hurd and Paul Reiser. Basically, Hart plays Matt, whose wife dies in childbirth leaving him with a baby girl, Maddy, that he swears to raise even without a wife, even though his mother (Woodard) doesn’t think he can handle fatherhood.
This is a very different movie for Hart, one that allows him to use some of his dramatic acting muscles that we’ve rarely seen from him, although the movie comes more into its own as it goes along. At first, we’re basically watching him trying to care for a baby in a way that doesn’t really break much new ground from the constant talk about babies crying and shitting. (That is what they do, after all.)
Once Maddy grows up, there’s a new dynamic, and Hart is great playing the role of a single father trying to date again, and when he meets a new woman named Swan (DeWanda Wise), he isn’t sure how to introduce her to his daughter. Melody Hurd, the young actress playing the slightly older Maddy is quite good and able to really help drive the second act of the movie, which is far more dramatic and real. She not only holds her own against Hart but also with Woodard!
Even though this is more dramatic than Hart’s normal fare, there are still some great low-key laughs including some great scenes between Hart and Howery as his friend. I genuinely enjoyed Fatherhood, since it’s sweet and a very different kind of movie for Hart, maybe due to Weitz’s able direction. Fatherhood probably won’t be for everyone and to some, seeing Hart in this role won’t be quite like when Adam Sandler makes his occasional foray into films like Punch Drunk Love or Uncut Gems -- that’s just the hypocrisy of film criticism -- but I’m sure this will do just fine on Netflix with Father’s Day being on Sunday.
Tumblr media
A movie I saw at SXSW earlier this year was Jaco Bouwer’s GAIA (Decal), which reminded me a bit of Ben Wheatley’s In the Earth. It stars Monique Rockman as an injured forest ranger who is saved by two survivalists, a rescue that becomes increasingly more suspicious as the son and his father have a cultish devotion to the forest, and she soon learns there’s a far great threat in the wilderness.It will hit theaters on Friday and then On Demand June 25. I just didn’t have the bandwidth to rewatch this to write a full review but it was fine, but just not quite on par with Wheatley’s movie, although it sure is pretty.
Tumblr media
A doc that’s being released theatrically Friday after its own festival run is Mariem Pérez Riera’s RITA MORENO: JUST A GIRL WHO DECIDED TO GO FOR IT (Roadside Attractions), which as you can tell from the title, looks at the amazing life and career of the EGOT-winning singer/actress who is such an inspiration for LatinX performers that she was able to get the likes of Héctor Elizondo, Gloria Estefan, Tom Fontana, Morgan Freeman, Mitzi Gaynor, Whoopi Goldberg, Norman Lear, Eva Longoria, Justina Machado, Terrence McNally, Lin-Manuel Miranda and Karen Olivo on camera to talk about her.
I really kind of enjoyed this movie, which just played at the Tribeca Film Festival, because I learned so much about Moreno that I really didn’t know before, but also it’s such an inspirational story as we hear her talk about what some of the scenes in West Side Story meant to her sixty years after winning the Oscar for the role, even though she’s still on record as giving one of the shortest Oscar speeches ever: “I don’t believe it!”
She also talks about really personal things like being raped by her agent, who she kept on as her agent after the incident, but that adds to her political activism in recent years, and she’s still a spry and lively disruptor at the age of 87. This is just a brilliant documentary that’s a long time coming.
Another doc worth checking out is Nancy Buirski’s A CRIME ON THE BAYOU, exec. Produced by John Legend’s company, Get Lifted Film Co. It revisits the case of Gary Duncan, a young fisherman in a Louisiana parish who tried to break up a fight at an integrated school in 1966, but when he puts his hand on a white boy’s arm, he’s prosecuted for assault on a minor. Duncan’s case was taken all the way to the Supreme Court to make sure he got a fair trial. This is a decent doc, but I don’t have a ton to say about it, nor the time for a full review.
Francois Ozon returns with SUMMER OF 85 (Music Box Films), which stars Félix Lefebvre as Alexis, whose boat capsizes off the coast of Normandy, Benjamin Voisin’s David comes to his rescue and opens the younger boy’s eyes to friendship, art and sexual bliss. Adapted from Aidan Chambers’ LGBT young adult novel Dance on my Grave, the film explores the relationship between the two boys and the challenges, including Philippine Velge’s sexual rival. The movie will open in New York at the Angelika Film Center, Village East, and Film at Lincoln Center, in Los Angeles at Laemmle’s Royal, Laemmle Playhouse 7 in Pasadena and Laemmle Town Center in Encino, and San Francisco (Embarcadero and Shattuck Cinema) followed by key markets across the US, including I’m assuming the Music Box home in Chicago.
Also opening as part of the Metrograph’s Live Screenings this week is THE AMERICAN SECTOR (Grasshopper Films), Courtney Stephens and Pacho Velez’s doc about the panels of the Berlin Wall that have been installed as monuments all across the United States, as they talk to people in those locations to find out what they mean to them.
Premiering on Apple TV+ this week is the new series PHYSICAL, starring the wonderful Rose Byrne (also in theaters in Peter Rabbit 2: The Runaway), but a few more movies I just didn’t have time to get to…
LES NOTROS (Oscilloscope)
THE BIRTHDAY CAKE (ScreenMedia)
STALKER (Vertical Entertainment)
Wait, is it possible? Is next week really FINALLY the release of Universal PIctures’ F9 in North America?
0 notes