just a thought: if you think Eddie is not cool because he is a loser, a dorky silly nerd boy with no rizz (whatever that means) and you end that sentence with: BUT I LOVE HIM SO AND I'D DIE FOR HIM... maybe, just maybe, you think he's pretty cool after all...? maybe, just maybe, cool isn't just one thing... maybe the whole point is that people can be into whatever they like no matter how niche and nerdy and the whole cool part is a matter of, I don't know, personality? and overall attitude? is the good stuff you get when you pry beyond the layers of denim and leather and DnD club merchandise?
can't for the life of me think of the guy from a troubled upbringing and low social status who just expresses himself the way he wants despite everybody giving him shit for it and for things he can't control and who gathers the other little outsiders around so that they aren't alone as a loser.
quite the opposite actually.
102 notes
·
View notes
I see so many people be like "will would be so mad if Nico turned up covered in blood that wasn't his" but I really think it would go something like this:
Will: why are you covered in blood?
Nico: its not mine!
Will: oh, ok, you want a sandwich?
Because Will is just happy his Nico isn't hurt. Like sure he doesn't *want* Nico to hurt someone but like at least Nico is ok.
37 notes
·
View notes
btw embracing your sexuality and being open and not feeling shame about it etc is great, BUT there's a huge difference between that and crossing other people's boundaries and yes this applies to women as well
making sexual comments to someone you don't know, or someone who isn't into it, is inappropriate and uncomfortable at best but tbh most of the time it's harrassment, and it doesn't matter what your or anyone else's gender is
there's this idea that women being sexual is a matter of liberation and sure, it can be, but it stops being that when you're crossing the line into harrassment
if a guy makes unwanted sexual comments to a woman, is he "just being open with his sexuality" or is he being a creep? I say the latter, and that's a matter of principle, not of gender, if a woman does it then she's just as much of a creep
"I'm just open about my sexuality" is not an excuse for ignoring other people's boundaries, and that includes things like being lewd in public, making sexual comments to/about people, discussing sexual stuff around people who don't want to hear about it, etc
yes, even if you are female and they are male
(and while we're at it, objectifying or fetishising a man isn't any better than doing it to a woman, it's just that it happens more often to women so we talk about that more, but the solution isn't to "balance it out" by doing it to men more, the solution is to stop doing it across the board)
embracing your sexuality is about YOU, it's about being comfortable with yourself and your desires, getting to know yourself honestly without shame or guilt or any of that, it doesn't mean deciding that boundaries are for prudes and just doing and saying whatever you want
like, consent still matters, always, you can embrace your sexuality all you like but you can't just go shoving it in other people's faces without their consent
4 notes
·
View notes
The most bewildering like deeply ideological and not at all real-world realistic applicable I ever see expressed in fandom and which throws me for a loop every single time is like...
‘It’s bad when the Chosen One or Royal Heir (or whatever) has some kind of actual physical or magical superiority over normal people because it means that they really do deserve their position :/ and undermines any message the story might tell that oppression is Bad :/’
Like. Am I wrong or is this just. Actual uncritical might makes right thinking...???
A person having magical powers does not grant them a moral right to rule over others. Nor the same with fighting ability or general physical fitness or whatever. People are every bit as equally valuable and meaningful regardless of how ‘fit’ they are.
Like am I wrong or are the non-magical people in these scenarios basically just the in-world equivalent of disabled people. And so... obviously it should go without saying that these people aren’t necessarily incapable of having a say in the running of the kingdom or whatever. Like. There is just no logical reason why that should be the case.
And yet over and over I see this assumption made, that ‘hero has special magic’ somehow DOES imply, inevitably, that societal castes are right and good. That the only way to actually tell a story where people all have equal value is to make them all equally physically or magically capable (i.e., make nobody disabled).
IDK maybe it’s just me but it makes perfect sense that in a world where some people have special powers, they’d tend to oppress those who don’t. And that it would be harder for those who don’t to succeed or be able to triumph as heroes. Isn’t... isn’t that just literally how oppression works, IRL...?!
8 notes
·
View notes
emily gwen, the creator of the sunset lesbian flag that we’ve come to commonly use, still continues to live in poverty.
multi-billion dollar companies have used their design and made profit from it, and yet they have not seen a cent for their creation.
i’ve been friends with emily for years, and i have not once seen them be financially stable the entire time. i’ve seen them homeless, unemployed, starving. right now, they need our help more than ever.
please consider donating to emily’s ko-fi, especially if you’ve used their design to create something and profited from it.
29K notes
·
View notes
i was thinking about that post comparing Jessica Rabbit as an asexual to Barbie and an asexual and then i thought of the Neil Gaiman post (was it a post?) about Crowley and Aziraphale being asexual sexless and then this happened.
anyways. thoughts?
sorry it took so long I meant to do this a week ago but my brain is full of rocks.
[Image ID a three sided venn diagram. the big circles show Margot Robbie's Barbie sitting in front of a mirror, Jessica and Roger Rabbit from the poster of Who Framed Roger Rabbit, and Aziraphale and Crowley from Good Omens standing back to back. Between Barbie and Jessica Rabbit it says "sexualised by society". Between Jessica Rabbit and Aziraphale and Crowley it says "Knows what sex is". Between Aziraphale and Crowley and Barbie it says "no reproductive system(?)". the center is the asexual flag. End ID]
Also i haven't seen the Barbie movie as of this edit so at least please tag your spoilers.
61K notes
·
View notes