I HAVE BEEN INFORMED VERY LATE THAT IT IS THE PRINCE AND THE FOOL ANNIVERSARY. (school has been kicking my ass I am a bit behind 😭) how people saw this and STILL think zukka is an ‘out of the ass’ and ‘nonsensical’ ship is amazing to me
anyway is that all you and sokka were, or were to one another?
no, i think not
iroh said:
760 notes
·
View notes
i'm working on compiling all we have for tapv so far and it never hit me that the smackjeeves archive (left) has the actual first few pages of the webcomic, while the official site archive (right) has the redrawn pages ? ? ? ?
6 notes
·
View notes
Friendly reminder that Francesco Coppino and Prospero di Camulio, contemporaries who were literally getting their information from predominantly Yorkist circles, were both explicitly clear that it was Henry VI who decided to surrender Berwick to Scotland.
Camulio: "King Henry has given away a castle [town] called Berwick, which is one of the keys of the frontier between England and Scotland."
Coppino: "[Scotland has] received from the same Henry the town of Berwick, on the frontiers of Scotland, which the Scots have long claimed as their right from the English, as the excellently well furnished guardian of their frontiers, and the place to which King Henry repaired as an asylum after the battle."
The idea that Margaret of Anjou was principally involved in the surrender, or that she was the one who actually made the decision, is based on nothing but assumption. Two direct contemporaries, both speaking of ongoing events as they unfolded, who were both getting information from Yorkist-held England, both clearly believed it was Henry who was responsible for this course of action. Neither of them mention Margaret. Sure, you can argue that it was merely rhetorical, and that they were simply automatically attributing such an important decision to the King rather than the queen - but rhetoric is nonetheless extremely important and helps us understand how historical figures were perceived at the time. Margaret's enemies would surely not have hesitated to broadcast her involvement had it actually been true, and Coppino in particular had shown no qualms about criticizing her in favor of the Yorkists before. If she was genuinely believed to have been responsible, and if the Yorkists were actually claiming that she was at the time, I see no reason why Coppino or Camulio would not have emphasized her role in their letters. What these samples instead indicate is literally the opposite: that their contemporaries - probably including the Yorkists who were putting out the information that Coppino and Camulio reported - actually believed that Henry was the one making the decision. I think it's a very large and very unnecessary stretch to go against actual evidence and claim otherwise by placing the responsibility on Margaret instead.
Additionally, these small samples may also reveal what people at the time - once again including the Yorkists - actually thought of Henry's role in the war on a broader level, away from direct Yorkist propaganda which would obviously and perhaps understandably seek to de-emphasize it: namely, that Henry was perceived as the one making decisions and deciding the courses of action for his own side.
Source: Excerpts from the Calendar of State Papers and Manuscripts, Existing in the Archives and Collections of Milan
5 notes
·
View notes
[Happy skiing to ya. Thank you very much. Historian staggered and had to prop himself up with the desk. Yeah. Okay?]
2 notes
·
View notes
saw another post incorrectly representing the field of history and/or archaeology. and i'm being so brave about it
17 notes
·
View notes
the fact that this manga is not fully scanned online and hasn't been published ever in the west despite being from a group 24's mangaka and having won prizes and being 40 years old is gonna drive me insane. i enjoyed the first 4ish volumes (of 11) that are the only existing trace online and not being able to get my hands on the rest is driving me insane i feel like im gonna do smth crazy
4 notes
·
View notes
face reveal whatever
art historians when they have to write more than 300 words
6 notes
·
View notes
ok i went thru all the good posts in the hbomb tag. normal again probably.
4 notes
·
View notes
astrophysics was a mistake
8 notes
·
View notes
having nostalgic bfdi memories and coming to realize i'm probably a fair amount older than the general fanbase now (i was really into it from ages like, 11-13, and i remember finding mostly people close to that) is strange because i have no idea what it's like now. back in the day bfdi and ii were like the only shows anyone really talked about and now i feel like i hear about new high quality shows all the time and while that's GREAT of course it makes me feel old somehow. i have no idea what's going on over there now. do kids these days still like matchbrush
7 notes
·
View notes
i like to think that my diaries, if found in the future, could be a source of controversy among historians:
Historian A: "The text literally references characters from shows that didn't start airing until the late 20th and early 21st century, you cretin!"
Historian B: "Those character names are generic and do not attest to what you think they do. How could you possibly date something consistently and flawlessly written in this script to the 21st century, you feckless fool?!"
Historian A: "But it mentions COVID-19!!!"
Historian B: "A difficulty for my interpretation, yes, but it defies reason that any diary written at a time when women were free to choose sexual partners would contain this much fantasizing that is so clearly driven by sexual repression. It dates to the mid-20th century at the latest."
5 notes
·
View notes
The way i'll just make a habit out of anything for no reason other than my amusement
I accidentally wore the same clothes two years in a row for picture day in primary school so i kept doing it till the end cause i thought it was funny
I only ever make a journal entry on day of the dead because again it incidentally happened a couple times and it makes the recent pages look very funny
5 notes
·
View notes
[Historian was not going to be intimidated.]
4 notes
·
View notes
spent way too long reading (one of?) the twitter links on that franzeska fandom racism post, and my tumblr app refreshed. if someone happens to see it or reblogged it recently, could you send it my way? thanks!
1 note
·
View note
I'm losing my mind slowly at the amount of times I see "historical costume discourse" online boil down to people thinking that the costumers are uneducated and should have dressed everyone perfectly period accurately, no room for modification.
Like....the costumers know that something may not be 100% accurate....they chose to dress the actors like that for a reason....and that reason is 9/10 times it communicates something about that character....
2 notes
·
View notes