Tumgik
#drive in historian
Text
I HAVE BEEN INFORMED VERY LATE THAT IT IS THE PRINCE AND THE FOOL ANNIVERSARY. (school has been kicking my ass I am a bit behind 😭) how people saw this and STILL think zukka is an ‘out of the ass’ and ‘nonsensical’ ship is amazing to me
anyway is that all you and sokka were, or were to one another?
no, i think not
Tumblr media Tumblr media
iroh said:
760 notes · View notes
jabberwockprince · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media
i'm working on compiling all we have for tapv so far and it never hit me that the smackjeeves archive (left) has the actual first few pages of the webcomic, while the official site archive (right) has the redrawn pages ? ? ? ?
6 notes · View notes
wonder-worker · 23 days
Text
Friendly reminder that Francesco Coppino and Prospero di Camulio, contemporaries who were literally getting their information from predominantly Yorkist circles, were both explicitly clear that it was Henry VI who decided to surrender Berwick to Scotland.
Camulio: "King Henry has given away a castle [town] called Berwick, which is one of the keys of the frontier between England and Scotland." Coppino: "[Scotland has] received from the same Henry the town of Berwick, on the frontiers of Scotland, which the Scots have long claimed as their right from the English, as the excellently well furnished guardian of their frontiers, and the place to which King Henry repaired as an asylum after the battle."
The idea that Margaret of Anjou was principally involved in the surrender, or that she was the one who actually made the decision, is based on nothing but assumption. Two direct contemporaries, both speaking of ongoing events as they unfolded, who were both getting information from Yorkist-held England, both clearly believed it was Henry who was responsible for this course of action. Neither of them mention Margaret. Sure, you can argue that it was merely rhetorical, and that they were simply automatically attributing such an important decision to the King rather than the queen - but rhetoric is nonetheless extremely important and helps us understand how historical figures were perceived at the time. Margaret's enemies would surely not have hesitated to broadcast her involvement had it actually been true, and Coppino in particular had shown no qualms about criticizing her in favor of the Yorkists before. If she was genuinely believed to have been responsible, and if the Yorkists were actually claiming that she was at the time, I see no reason why Coppino or Camulio would not have emphasized her role in their letters. What these samples instead indicate is literally the opposite: that their contemporaries - probably including the Yorkists who were putting out the information that Coppino and Camulio reported - actually believed that Henry was the one making the decision. I think it's a very large and very unnecessary stretch to go against actual evidence and claim otherwise by placing the responsibility on Margaret instead.
Additionally, these small samples may also reveal what people at the time - once again including the Yorkists - actually thought of Henry's role in the war on a broader level, away from direct Yorkist propaganda which would obviously and perhaps understandably seek to de-emphasize it: namely, that Henry was perceived as the one making decisions and deciding the courses of action for his own side.
Source: Excerpts from the Calendar of State Papers and Manuscripts, Existing in the Archives and Collections of Milan
#henry vi#margaret of anjou#english history#my post#I want to make a longer post detailing the clear indications we have that Henry *was* perceived as the active decision maker of his side#which indicates that contemporaries did not really think that there was some kind of giant 'role-reversal' between him and MoA#but until then the gist is:#after Henry was rescued in 1461 contemporary letters clearly emphasize his own actions; they mostly did not attribute decisions to Margaret#we also know he and Margaret separated when she headed off to the continent;#that he seems to have been involved in border-raids against Yorkist England;#*and* that he avoided capture until 1465#if Henry was entirely passive throughout it all and entirely dependent on Margaret to make decisions#I do not understand how any of this would have been possible#Instead Henry & Margaret seemed to have had more of a partnership with Margaret focusing on gaining international support#which she was very well-suited for given her powerful foreign connections#& with her taking on leadership in his absence (mainly due to imprisonment/incapacity) rather than all the time/when they were together#and like I said when it comes to Berwick contemporaries clearly believed it was Henry's decision#but also like. let's hypothetically assume that Margaret was the driving force behind it. please think of this situation logically.#whoever's idea it was Scotland was very obviously going to want a proper confirmation from the *king*#who was. yk. the actual authority of the country#even if Margaret was the one encouraging this surrender Henry's approval and agreement would have still been required#if not by the Lancastrian party then by Scotland#and again this is assuming that Margaret was actually the driving force behind it. there's no indication that she was#but ultimately contemporaries very clearly believed *Henry* was responsible#we don't know what MoA actually thought of it or what her actual involvement was (she could may encouraged it; she may have misliked it;#she may have simply been told after the decision had already been made)#but ultimately even in the most extreme case - which is contradicted by actual evidence - the final say would have been Henry's#it would be nice if this was reflected by historians?
5 notes · View notes
fieriframes · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
[Happy skiing to ya. Thank you very much. Historian staggered and had to prop himself up with the desk. Yeah. Okay?]
2 notes · View notes
nowendil · 1 year
Text
saw another post incorrectly representing the field of history and/or archaeology. and i'm being so brave about it
17 notes · View notes
lesbicastagna · 3 months
Text
the fact that this manga is not fully scanned online and hasn't been published ever in the west despite being from a group 24's mangaka and having won prizes and being 40 years old is gonna drive me insane. i enjoyed the first 4ish volumes (of 11) that are the only existing trace online and not being able to get my hands on the rest is driving me insane i feel like im gonna do smth crazy
4 notes · View notes
cult-rangoons · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
my beloved children (except for the guy with the mullet I hate him)
3 notes · View notes
milkstoner · 4 months
Text
face reveal whatever
Tumblr media Tumblr media
art historians when they have to write more than 300 words
6 notes · View notes
milfygerard · 5 months
Text
ok i went thru all the good posts in the hbomb tag. normal again probably.
4 notes · View notes
tempestclerics · 1 year
Text
astrophysics was a mistake
8 notes · View notes
moonsidesong · 1 year
Text
having nostalgic bfdi memories and coming to realize i'm probably a fair amount older than the general fanbase now (i was really into it from ages like, 11-13, and i remember finding mostly people close to that) is strange because i have no idea what it's like now. back in the day bfdi and ii were like the only shows anyone really talked about and now i feel like i hear about new high quality shows all the time and while that's GREAT of course it makes me feel old somehow. i have no idea what's going on over there now. do kids these days still like matchbrush
7 notes · View notes
crepe-of-wrath · 1 year
Text
i like to think that my diaries, if found in the future, could be a source of controversy among historians:
Historian A: "The text literally references characters from shows that didn't start airing until the late 20th and early 21st century, you cretin!"
Historian B: "Those character names are generic and do not attest to what you think they do. How could you possibly date something consistently and flawlessly written in this script to the 21st century, you feckless fool?!"
Historian A: "But it mentions COVID-19!!!"
Historian B: "A difficulty for my interpretation, yes, but it defies reason that any diary written at a time when women were free to choose sexual partners would contain this much fantasizing that is so clearly driven by sexual repression. It dates to the mid-20th century at the latest."
5 notes · View notes
minoan-ophidian · 1 year
Text
The way i'll just make a habit out of anything for no reason other than my amusement
I accidentally wore the same clothes two years in a row for picture day in primary school so i kept doing it till the end cause i thought it was funny
I only ever make a journal entry on day of the dead because again it incidentally happened a couple times and it makes the recent pages look very funny
5 notes · View notes
fieriframes · 8 months
Text
Tumblr media
[Historian was not going to be intimidated.]
4 notes · View notes
zippers · 11 months
Text
spent way too long reading (one of?) the twitter links on that franzeska fandom racism post, and my tumblr app refreshed. if someone happens to see it or reblogged it recently, could you send it my way? thanks!
1 note · View note
florallychaotic · 1 year
Text
I'm losing my mind slowly at the amount of times I see "historical costume discourse" online boil down to people thinking that the costumers are uneducated and should have dressed everyone perfectly period accurately, no room for modification.
Like....the costumers know that something may not be 100% accurate....they chose to dress the actors like that for a reason....and that reason is 9/10 times it communicates something about that character....
2 notes · View notes