#because of how i meddled with the settings in mcc | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

my-brodie999-fan · 5 years

Text

What could’ve been if the Marvel Creative Committee was never formed and Marvel Studios was always in charge.

After 10 years, The Marvel Cinematic Universe is the highest-grossing and most successful franchise based on a superhero universe. They have committed mistakes along the way, but they are known for learning from them. But without the Marvel Creative Committee, Marvel may not have made those mistakes and some specific Marvel films, such as Thor: The Dark World and Iron Man 2 may have been better. The Marvel Cinematic Universe may be one of Hollywood's "tent-poles". But they may be even more so if the Creative Committee was never formed. James Gunn quoted "The difficult thing about judging the influence of the Creative Commitee is that it really isn't known how much power they had. Could a director just ignore their notes and move on or would that just make them complain louder?" James Gunn has said a few things about the Commitee which led thousands of fans to believe they had some influence over what ends up on screen. In a Facebook Q&A, he said that a committee gave him "messy" notes about Ronan the Accuser, resulting in the villain being a poor character. Perhaps, that is only gunn using a scapegoat to explain away a bad villain, but he did not stop there. In Vanity Fair, Gunn stated that the Committee wished to remove the Awesome Mix from the film. I doubt Gunn would be complaing about the Committee had they just been something he could ignore, which perhaps illuminates a bigger issue: how much did the Committee know about filmmaking?" As I stated above, Thor: The Dark World may have been better, making 19 of the MCU films well-received commercially and critically. Marvel would have had much more control over the former if they convinced Universal to allow them to take the shots of the film. However, If I were to go back in time and change things, here's how the MCU would have been. In Iron Man 2, Ivan Vanko could have been a full-fledged human being. Mickey Rourke vowed never to work on a superhero film after Marvel ruined his performance. One bad quote such as "I can make salute" seriously made fans outraged. Seriously, what was The Creative Committee thinking? But that might have changed if his performance was better. Demon In a Bottle would have been the main storyline instead of borrowing elements from various Iron Man storylines.

When Iron Man 3 was in production, Jon Favreau was set to direct Iron Man 3. But after the poor results from Iron Man 2, he refused to do so. Rebecca Hall was upset that she wasn't promised that she would be a female version of the Mandarin. Had the MCC not gotten involved, she could have been the main villain and the first female villain to do so, making Hela the second female villain to be the main antagoinst. At this point, fans have realised how big Marvel made a mistake to kill her off in the third act of the film. And it would have been much longer as it would have been 3 hours and 15 minutes. But Disney/Marvel wouldn't have let that happen anyway. Perhaps, Jon Favreau would have still been director of Iron Man 3.

In 2011, Patty Jenkins was set to direct Thor: The Dark World, but Marvel fired her because of creative differences. Alan Taylor was not fond of doing the film as he was given a lot of freedom when he was filming only for Execustive meddling to change everything in post-production and Natalie Portman threatened to leave Marvel in protest of Jenkins's firing and only stayed on because it was less trouble than potentially getting sued for breach of contract. Had the Creative Commitee never been formed, Jenkins could have been the first female director to direct both Marvel and DC films.And The Dark World could have been a lot different because it would have a "Romeo & Juliet" feel to it. Jenkins could have at least made amends and been allowed to produce the film, causing DC and Marvel fans to finally unite as J.J Abrams united Mission: Impossible, Star Trek and Star Wars fans by directing Mission : Impossible III, the first two Star Trek reboot films and Star Wars: The Force Awakens.

In Avengers: Age of Ultron, Hulk abandoned the Avengers in one of the Quinjets. But things would have been different had he been jettisoned into outer space just as in the comics. But Marvel overruled that as they feared people would want a Planet Hulk film. Joss Whedon filmed a sub-plot where Thor searches for the Norm Stones. But Marvel told him to either cut the farm scene or the Nord cave as the movie was becoming too long. If the Marvel Creative Commitee never formed, this would have been a reality. Ike Perlmutter has been largely responsible for Marvel Studios reorganised under Disney for allowing the MCC take control of their films and ruining plots they planned for them. If Kevin Feige never reported to him, the landscape at the Marvel Cinematic Universe would have been quite different.

https://www.comicbookmovie.com/marvel_studios/how-different-the-marvel-cinematic-universe-would-be-if-the-marvel-creative-committee-was-never-formed-a162745

#thor the dark world #avengers: age of ultron #marvel studios #marvel cinematic universe #iron man 3 #iron man 2 #marvel movies

1 note · View note

ultrasfcb-blog · 6 years

Text

Australia ball-tampering row: What's it and why is it so severe?

Australia ball-tampering row: What’s it and why is it so severe?

Watch: Bancroft and Smith admit ball-tampering plan

Arms up if you understand how many runs South Africa gained the third Take a look at in opposition to Australia by? Or in the event you knew what the rating was on day three? Or if, previous to Saturday, you knew there was a 3rd Take a look at happening?

No matter your view on the ball-tampering saga – humorous, pathetic, reprehensible or a mixture of all three – it is not possible to disclaim it has overshadowed a doubtlessly nice sequence.

Captain Steve Smith and Cameron Bancroft’s admission on Saturday that Australia had a premeditated plan to tamper with the ball turned the Take a look at right into a circus.

The 2 have been sanctioned by the Worldwide Cricket Council, however that can solely be the start of the fall-out.

So what’s the cause for ball-tampering? Is it as severe because it has been made out to be? And have Australia, with their discuss of “the road” and figuring out the place it is drawn, introduced additional scorn on themselves?

What’s ball-tampering?

Stage two offences – of which Smith and Bancroft had been discovered responsible – are severe. There are 4 ranges below the ICC’s code of conduct, which takes steerage from a cricket committee that features former gamers and umpiring representatives, with 4 being the best when it comes to severity.

And ball-tampering – which frequently leads to a group having the ability to utilise reverse swing, the place the ball strikes via the air at excessive velocity in direction of a batsman – occurs extra usually than individuals realise.

Roughing up one aspect of the ball will be achieved by, say, a fielder out on the boundary throwing the ball in on the bounce right into a tough a part of the sq.. Typically, these stationed shut may bounce the ball to the keeper.

Whereas throwing the ball on the bounce will not be unlawful, umpires are fast to warn a fielding aspect in the event that they imagine it’s being achieved to change the state of the ball.

Australia ball-tampering row: Simon Hughes explains what occurred in Cape City

Sweets or sun-cream can be utilized for the shiny aspect of the ball. Marcus Trescothick, the chief shiner of the ball through the 2005 Ashes, wrote in his autobiography that he used Murray Mints to supply saliva that might shine the ball successfully.

Beneath the legal guidelines, gamers should not apply synthetic substances to the ball.

A latest piece on Cricinfo stated that ball-tampering was not as unusual as you may assume. And but, these incidents aren’t extensively condemned.

Not strolling when you realize you have edged the ball. Claiming a catch you realize is not clear. Doctoring a pitch for dwelling benefit. These are all types of dishonest within the eyes of many.

To make use of Australia spinner Nathan Lyon’s phrase, they’re incidents that on the very least “headbutt the road” of what’s proper and improper.

However they occur in cricket on a regular basis. Ball-tampering, although, is seen to be intentionally duplicitous. Australia’s pre-meditation to meddle with the ball in some way makes the entire thing extra unpalatable for followers.

Why has the backlash been so extreme?

Australian dishonest past perception – PM Turnbull

“I would be very dissatisfied if certainly one of our group members did that. The foundations are in place for a cause – in the event you’re not going to make use of them, then why hassle having them?”

Not a remark from the previous few days. It is what David Warner said in 2016, when requested to remark about South Africa captain Faf du Plessis’ effective for ball-tampering in a Take a look at between the perimeters.

Sixteen months is a very long time in cricket. Warner stood down as vice-captain earlier than the ultimate day’s play in Cape City as a result of his position within the “management group” that determined to tamper with the ball on Saturday afternoon.

Warner’s feedback, whereas ironic now, could give some perception into why Australia’s actions have been roundly condemned.

“This Australian group are so friendless in cricket due to the way in which they’ve carried on,” ex-England spinner Graeme Swann instructed BBC Radio 5 dwell.

“They’ve set themselves as this higher-than-high, pious group who set the benchmark for what is true and what’s improper in cricket, when everybody who has performed in opposition to them is aware of it is an absolute joke.”

This sequence was already in a mire of unpleasantness earlier than that little piece of yellow tape appeared. Gamers have been banned, fined, then allowed to play after prolonged appeals.

There was a heated argument in a hall; misogynist shaming of Warner’s spouse, Candice, and crowd abuse described as “unacceptable” by coach Darren Lehmann – the identical Lehmann who requested Australia’s followers to ship Stuart Broad dwelling in tears from the 2013-14 Ashes.

However this Australian group have formed themselves round taking part in exhausting. Off-spinner Lyon stated the aspect hoped to “end careers” within the latest Ashes sequence. Sledging in that sequence overstepped the mark, in keeping with former wicketkeeper Matt Prior. Due to this, it makes it tough to garner sympathy for Australia.

“The behaviour of a number of the gamers within the present South Africa/Australia sequence, and different incidents in latest occasions within the recreation all of us cherish, has fallen nicely beneath the usual required to encourage future generations of cricket-loving households,” an MCC assertion learn on Monday.

That could be the crux of the difficulty. Every thing has come to a head round this one subject of ball-tampering – a problem that’s all the time controversial – and the ramifications have been way over Australia might have anticipated.

What are the legal guidelines?

Smith’s punishment was for his conduct, which was “of a severe nature that’s opposite to the spirit of the sport”. Bancroft’s was for the bodily act of ball-tampering.

Social media has been abuzz with individuals claiming the punishments are mild. However they’re in keeping with the legal guidelines.

Bancroft was given three demerit factors, simply as Du Plessis was when he was found guilty in 2016. Du Plessis was additionally fined 100% of his match price, simply as Smith was. Smith has additionally been banned, which exhibits his additional accountability as captain.

Examples of offences on the totally different ranges embrace:

Stage one offences: Extreme interesting, displaying dissent at umpire’s determination

Stage two offences: Utilizing language that’s critically obscene or offensive, inappropriate or deliberate bodily contact

Stage three offences: Menace of assault on one other participant, intimidation of umpire or match referee

Stage 4 offences: Menace of assault on umpire or match referee, bodily assault of one other participant

Punishments for ball tampering have varied. Shahid Afridi was banned for 2 Twenty20 matches in 2010 for apparently biting the ball. Then-England captain Mike Atherton was fined £2,000 in 1994 however his defence was he was making an attempt to keep up the ball’s situation.

Proteas tempo bowler Kagiso Rabada was charged with a stage two breach of conduct when he shoulder-bumped Smith within the second Take a look at. He was banned for 2 Checks as a result of reaching eight demerit factors, however it was overturned on enchantment.

Smith and Bancroft will even be punished by their very own governing physique. And, given the feedback made by Cricket Australia CEO James Sutherland, these punishments could also be extra extreme.

Sutherland wrote an open letter on Sunday, apologising to the followers who had been “let down”.

“This behaviour calls into query the integrity of the group and Cricket Australia,” he stated.

“We all know how you’re feeling and have heard your suggestions loud and clear. We share your anger and disappointment. All Australians, like us, need solutions and we are going to maintain you up to date on our findings, as a matter of urgency.”

Laborious however honest. That is the mantra Australia have caught by. However within the eyes of a few of their followers, it has value them dearly.

ultras FC Barcelona - https://ultrasfcb.com/cricket/1879/

#Barcelona

#cricket

0 notes