#anti ant naruhina | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

narhinafan · 3 years

Note

Hello, let me introduce you to forever changing narutoverse~

Did you know that naruto series doesn't have a stable continuity?

Kishimoto just Like Akira Toriyama made arcs on the spot. The first time Naruto was only to last till bell arc and was extended afterwards. This created lots of retcons and plotholes as the series continued.

Let compare longlines of the pilot and the first chapter of Naruto manga.

Do you see the difference?

"But this is a pilot" you might say "A lot of manga's stray from their pilots"

And that is true, however it gives us valuable information that there actually weren't bijuu but main one the Ninetails.

At the start of the series excluding the pilot, there were no Juubi that split into nine tailed beasts

Shukaku didn't recognize Kurama or that Naruto was the host of him. They were total strangers during the Gaara fight.

Did you know that the first time edo tensei was used in the series the bodies could regenerate themselves?

So The 4th Hokage running around armless was a change they made only in Shippuden for reasons unknown.

Speaking of 4th Hokage at the early Naruto series his name wasn't Minato Namikaze but on the summoning scroll he was first named as Uzumaki Arashi?

These are not the only changes and retcons scattered around the series.

So backing up to the question you've asked do you know when was this introduced to the series?

That's right in THE LAST movie. Right after the original series ended.

It was made so that Hinata would be his first love. And in this canon movie and Boruto series after she probably was, as they've changed 2 more major aspects of the previous Naruto.

First one being kagebunshin no jutsu.

The regular bunshin to pass the academy required this hand seal. However in the Last Naruto already new the forbidden technique hand seal which he shouldn't have learnt as he haven't stolen the forbidden scroll yet.

Meaning the past of this Naruto was changed and we don't know if he actually stole the scroll much earlier in the series or he learned it from somewhere else.

Another major thing that deviates from the old Naruto series is that this Naruto doesn't understand people love vs object love.

While in the OG Naruto the 2 out 3 major fights was literally about Naruto finding people important to his life so he wouldn't be alone.

It's strange that the Borutoverse decided to disregard this, as Hinata was devoted to Naruto even from a distance and gave her life because of it so OG Naruto did understand her feelings. But it probably is much easier to go "he's a dummy that's why he didn't respond for so long :v" then "he might have not considered or felt the same at that moment"

He longed for love, so it was easy for him to resonate with people who seeked it as well.

This is the reason why canon naruto is a multiverse branching out into different directions. Everything here is canon but not much is consistent.?

It's complete bs and whoever wrote this clearly didn't read Naruto properly. The part with Shukaku makes sense as the manga Naruto transformed into a normal fox not the nine tails in the manga that was a change the anime made and is not canon. Second only the jinchuuriki transformation can be considered somewhat reconed, but in part 1 we only had 2 tailed beast shown so it is more of the case of Shukaku being the odd one out rather then Kishimoto retconned.

The reanimation not regeneration was specifically stated to be due to the truth seeking orbs which negate ninjutsu. This fact wasn't discovered at first as they were using clones, but it is right there in the manga.

As for the name on the scroll Kishimoto just wrote down random names meant to be illegible and not an official statement to what the fourth hoakge's name was. In fact I have only seen western fans point the name out, none of the Japanese fan base has mentioned it nor is there a statement from Kishimoto about and for good reason as it was somthing made up by western fans.

The scroll doesn't even say Uzumaki (うずまき) in the second column, it was only fans only western fans that claimed that. You can clearly tell the difference between Naruto who spelt his full name and compare it with the second column you would find the characters for Uzumaki aren't there.

The characters for Arashi are アラシ or 嵐, neither of which if you look closely match what is on the scroll.

Namikaze Minato 波風ミナト If you look at the characters for Minato's name you would notice that Namikaze has the same kanji that Arashi is spelt with.

So not only does it not say Uzumaki were Minato's name should be, but the characters for the name people claim closely match the characters that appear in Minato's name.

So yeah the fan name people use is completely made up.

nThe last never retconned anything, the only thing they can was, would be the starting bit, but even then that would be more of an animation error as they used shadow clones instead of regular clones. Naruto's signature jutsu is shadow clones so the one doing that scene getting confused with the normal clone jutsu is no surprise. Sakura was never canonically called Naruto's first love either, it only said he liked Sakura, but never once stated he actually loved her. Also the manga confirms what the last said about him competing with Sasuke as in the manga Naruto only ever brought up asking Sakura out when Sasuke is involved or about to show up.

Naruto never understood love though cause he never had anyone love him like that, he had friendship with team 7 and slight family love, but keep in mind it was one sided on Naruto's end a lot at first. Naruto never actually brings up love in the fights he mentioned it mostly goes on about being freed from his loneliness and not love. The most important people Naruto had at the times of the mentioned fights were his friends and considering Naruto started out with nothing his bar for friends and family are set drastically low. It wasn't just love that Naruto sought, but it was acknowledgement which is what he goes on about when he beat Gaara that he found people that acknowledged him.

See even Naruto outright states the reason why his friends are important to him is cause they acknowledged his existence. He never once mentioned love, but acknowledgement and being saved from loneliness are the key parts of his speech.

#anti ant naruhina #anti narusaku

22 notes · View notes

21tailsofwoe · 7 years

Text

on hinata and naruhina

This is probably gonna earn either hate or mixed reactions from my followers, but here goes anyway.

Since I am a NaruSaku and a Sakura fan, there seems to be a common misconception that I must be a Hinata hater or I must be a NaruHina hater, when in reality, it’s far from the case.

Most of my pro-Sakura or pro-NaruSaku posts are reblogged with ant/i-hinata or ant/i-naruhina, with addendums that bash on both of them in order to make Sakura or NaruSaku look better. All of that is fine and well, and even though I may have a keen understanding of where this hate comes from, I just don’t like it when it’s done on my posts, which rarely seem to imply hate towards either of these things.

Hate is too strong of a word to describe what I feel towards Hinata’s character. When these reblogs tend to hold on to the superior qualities of Sakura, there’s a blatant exploitation of Hinata’s biggest character flaw(s), with complete disregard of Sakura not being free from flaws herself. Even as a Sakura fan, I cannot overlook the mistakes that she has made; a few mistakes she has never seemed to learn from. Presenting of one-sided facts just to put one character on a pedestal is wrong, in my opinion. It’s the same case with the ships.

Hey, if you want to vent out about Hinata, go ahead! There’s nothing like the satisfaction of giving good criticism with valid points. But here’s a small request: please don’t go on hating Hinata with baseless arguments on my pro-sakura and pro-narusaku posts. Don’t downplay Hinata if I haven’t really mentioned her name or implied that I was talking about her. Reason is, most of the times, this tends to attract certain anti’s from all over the place to my blog, and then the meaning of the original post as well as my intentions is entirely lost.

I hope you understand.

As for my thoughts on Hinata and NaruHina...Well, like I said, I don’t hate them. Not at all. I believe that Hinata has suffered from the same disease almost all the female characters in the Naruto series suffer from: Kishimoto. I loved her in part one. Her ‘proud failure’ speech is something I hold close to my heart even to this day. Part 1 Hinata is the reason I can never bring myself to hate her, I owe her this much. And for NaruHina, it may be my NOTP, but I’m not an anti. I get the appeal of the ship, though development was a bit lagging (no thanks to the Last).

Sorry for the blabber-fest. I just needed to let it out.

Thank you for reading.

#me seriously talks #metalks #hinata #naruhina #sakura haruno #anti-kishi #writers never gave kunoichi love so i have to #even hinata deserved better #thank u 4 reading #and to all my hinata-hating mutuals: I still love all of you despite our views

33 notes · View notes