I feel like one of the best parts of the vamp lover au would be the genetic lip scar
because the obvious reaction to the classic "this person looks exactly like this old painting" things is like, okay we're having fun but obviously it's a coincidence that these people look similar
But not only do the sketches look like the wanted poster
*they all have the same scar*
and it's not photoshopped! it's super prominent! scars are one of the main facts listed in an apb! and Leonardo *definitely* did some uh, "studies" of the the vampire lover's lips. so????? what's less ridiculous? That this guy has been alive for a thousand years? or that there's some kind of secret society that ritually scars their lips as part of membership, and three guys centuries apart just *happen* to look very similar?
@fanworldbuildingfun asashjksdhfakjhfdjskahdfjk THE GENETIC SCAR!!!
You know there will be conspiracy theorists pointing at all of Leonardo's sketches focusing so much on it (maybe even one sketch where the focus is on Ezio's face and it's so clear that he's expecting a kiss, "HOW CAN YOU SAY THEY'RE NOT AT LEAST FUCKING??? HAVE ANY MODELS EVER LOOK AT AN ARTIST LIKE THIS AND NOT WANT TO FUCK THEM???")
Anyway... it's a very common evidence used by videos and posts trying to explain why The Wanted Poster Boy (also known as Da Vinci Wanted Boy and Abstergo's Most Wanted) and Leonardo's Secret Vampire Lover are the same person.
And now, this sketch from Syria has the same scar and face and asjdhjkasdhfjhsadjkhjksadjkfhsajkdhf EVERYONE IS UPDATING THEIR POSTS, VIDEOS ARE GETTING UPLOADED WITH MORE MINUTES
It's glorious chaos.
Someone is suggesting Reincarnation AND NOW THE TOP THREE HIGHEST TAGS IN AO3's Leonardo Da Vinci/Secret Vampire Lover pairing tags are:
Vampire AU
Reincarnation AU
im not naming vampie altair
117 notes
·
View notes
so the bush thing is from the s6 prank war, after it escalated. grian and tango go a heist and steal things in the vault, but also add grian heads to docm's bush in the office, which he was really mad about (which is why the first hermit gang verse is "listen grian nobody touches my bush") - doc discovers it in HC VI ep 61 (9min for the bush), and retaliates in ep 62. the final teams are finalized from the allies/enemies list from docm's retaliation if i recall correctly
ill be honest with you anon, my friend, i think some base assumptions about my knowledge of season six are being made here that i do not measure up to. i am so sorry to say this but i dont know if ive ever actually watched an episode of season six. i think ive watched a few random bits of maybe? three episodes? but i dont think ive ever watched an entire episode of season six start to finish
which is to say. what vault? why was there a heist? i know vaguely that there was a prank war and then nothing about it at all (is this when grian was? stealing doors? i think i heard something about dressing up like a chicken and stealing doors??) what is significant about this bush? is this a bad time to admit ive listened to hermitgang once ever and it was on a clip of an inthelittlewood stream and i didnt even get through the whole song
18 notes
·
View notes
Terry Pratchett about fantasy ❤
Terry Pratchett interview in The Onion, 1995 (x)
O: You’re quite a writer. You’ve a gift for language, you’re a deft hand at plotting, and your books seem to have an enormous amount of attention to detail put into them. You’re so good you could write anything. Why write fantasy?
Terry: I had a decent lunch, and I’m feeling quite amiable. That’s why you’re still alive. I think you’d have to explain to me why you’ve asked that question.
O: It’s a rather ghettoized genre.
Terry: This is true. I cannot speak for the US, where I merely sort of sell okay. But in the UK I think every book— I think I’ve done twenty in the series— since the fourth book, every one has been one the top ten national bestsellers, either as hardcover or paperback, and quite often as both. Twelve or thirteen have been number one. I’ve done six juveniles, all of those have nevertheless crossed over to the adult bestseller list. On one occasion I had the adult best seller, the paperback best-seller in a different title, and a third book on the juvenile bestseller list. Now tell me again that this is a ghettoized genre.
O: It’s certainly regarded as less than serious fiction.
Terry: (Sighs) Without a shadow of a doubt, the first fiction ever recounted was fantasy. Guys sitting around the campfire— Was it you who wrote the review? I thought I recognized it— Guys sitting around the campfire telling each other stories about the gods who made lightning, and stuff like that. They did not tell one another literary stories. They did not complain about difficulties of male menopause while being a junior lecturer on some midwestern college campus.
Fantasy is without a shadow of a doubt the ur-literature, the spring from which all other literature has flown. Up to a few hundred years ago no one would have disagreed with this, because most stories were, in some sense, fantasy. Back in the middle ages, people wouldn’t have thought twice about bringing in Death as a character who would have a role to play in the story. Echoes of this can be seen in Pilgrim’s Progress, for example, which hark back to a much earlier type of storytelling. The epic of Gilgamesh is one of the earliest works of literature, and by the standard we would apply now— a big muscular guys with swords and certain godlike connections— That’s fantasy. The national literature of Finland, the Kalevala. Beowulf in England. I cannot pronounce Bahaghvad-Gita but the Indian one, you know what I mean. The national literature, the one that underpins everything else, is by the standards that we apply now, a work of fantasy.
Now I don’t know what you’d consider the national literature of America, but if the words Moby Dick are inching their way towards this conversation, whatever else it was, it was also a work of fantasy. Fantasy is kind of a plasma in which other things can be carried. I don’t think this is a ghetto. This is, fantasy is, almost a sea in which other genres swim. Now it may be that there has developed in the last couple of hundred years a subset of fantasy which merely uses a different icongraphy, and that is, if you like, the serious literature, the Booker Prize contender. Fantasy can be serious literature. Fantasy has often been serious literature. You have to fairly dense to think that Gulliver’s Travels is only a story about a guy having a real fun time among big people and little people and horses and stuff like that. What the book was about was something else. Fantasy can carry quite a serious burden, and so can humor. So what you’re saying is, strip away the trolls and the dwarves and things and put everyone into modern dress, get them to agonize a bit, mention Virginia Woolf a few times, and there! Hey! I’ve got a serious novel. But you don’t actually have to do that.
(Pauses) That was a bloody good answer, though I say it myself.
6K notes
·
View notes