Tumgik
#and then for C!Wilbur just the implications of him viewing C!Tommy not following him into death after L’Manburgs second explosion as C!Tommy
dracoria-azucar · 3 years
Text
The more we explore C!Wilbur and C!Dream’s relationships with C!Tommy the more upsetting the:
“Who am I without you?” - “Yourself.” 
interaction gets. 
Like. We talk about the objectification/dehumanization C!Techno faces, being treated as a glorified secret weapon by his allies rather than a friend, more often than not.
But we really gotta start talking about how C!Wilbur views this kid as some unhealthy extension of himself, bordering heavily on treating him like his lap dog? And the fact that C!Dream has out right stated that he considers the boy to be a personification of conflict and passion that he wants to keep locked away all to himself??
The treatment Techno gets is definitely upsetting but there are certain moments where Tommy is objectified in ways that are viscerally disgusting. Especially considering. That he is a teenager. And being treated that way by people he legitimately trusted and idolized has very explicitly affected the way he views relationships as well as his own sense of self worth.
51 notes · View notes
smp-live · 2 years
Text
I have very very conflicting feelings about the topic of c!Crimeboys and abuse but it basically boils down to it doesn't feel right even though, from c!Tommy's pov, all of the pieces are there. Disregarding his mental health situation and only looking at it from how it affected c!Tommy, c!Wilbur was in a position of power over him and did occasionally take advantage of it ("If you want to be President, you're gonna have to get on my good side"), and even as he only told him what he believed it did have lasting harm on c!Tommy.
It's like... mostly one-sided toxicity with a power dynamic, which by definition should be abusive, but it just sits wrong with me. Maybe because c!Tommy barely respected c!Wilbur's authority at that point, and so while there was a power dynamic, it wasn't played into. idk. I'm not here to pick that apart because I do think that different people are using different definitions of abuse; some extreme, some intent-based, some victim-focused, and that is what complicates this discussion a whole bunch.
I do know that the thing that makes me most uncomfortable about it is the implication that a c!Crimeboys reconciliation would have? If they're pushing for a semi-healthy relationship at the end, that is. Already, we have c!Tommy talking about how he only felt safe following c!Wilbur, expressing how he wants to return to that, and it's just... uncomfortable, when you think about it in the context of a kid and someone who was abusive to him. And I know he's talking about L'Manburg Wilbur, who didn't hurt him, but they're the same person. And they do need to learn to stand on their own to have any semblance of a healthy relationship, but there is a very different vibe that comes across with learning to stand on their own but still together if you talk of abuse as opposed to an unhealthy dynamic imo.
c!Wilbur is still accountable for his actions from back then, and while c!Tommy is forgiving and would accept him back, I don't see c!Wilbur reaching that point where it would be healthy and acceptable for them to do so within the timeframe of the story in this case. While he is trying to get better and does feel guilty over Pogtopia, he was still repeating a few behaviours that betray similar emotions to what made Pogtopia bad, (the sand, "you're all I have" - which he believes, but if we're using a victim-focused lens then it did have a negative impact on c!Tommy, etc.) And on top of that, you'd need c!Tommy to unlearn viewing him as that safe leader, coming to view him more critically, before reconciling and softening up towards him, but in a different way. It would be a lot of character growth for both of them, and I simply don't think that they can do that within the timeframe of the story. I just think that the story needs c!Crimeboys reconciliation for it to resolve satisfactorily, and I don't think that that can happen with any abusive reading of their Pogtopia relationship.
19 notes · View notes
soren1830 · 2 years
Text
"If C!Kirstin is good, why is Limbo terrible?"
This is a question I have seen floating around, most recently by @nachosforfree X (love the short story that got attached)
This question and following headcannons balance on two things. The fandom's view of Kirstin as a/the Death Goddess (If cannon, please send me a link!!!) and what we have seen regarding Limbo/the afterlife.
Which is terrible. All my homies hate Limbo.
and if Limbo is terrible, they imply that something went wrong(which is fun angst ngl) regarding Kirsten and her control over it.
However, there is a fundamental misunderstanding here.
Death =/= Afterlife
This is a common misunderstanding, most often seen with the Greek god Hades. Hades is not the god of death, that is a fundamental misreading. He is the god OF THE dead, and king of the underworld. In other words, he is in control of what happens after the event of death.
Thanatos on the other hand is the god(or personification) of death. Depictions range from vengeful, to cold, to kind(ish), but they agree that he, Thanatos, is death. (He also has an interesting family which would be fun to parrel with certain other characters but maybe later)
is this applicable at all to DSMP?
I would argue yes for two reasons. Story telling pulls from the past, both on purpose and unconsciously, and the greek myths are one of those traditions that can be often seen and easily refenced in the west.
Secondly, we know that Techno (C! and CC!) loves the greek myths and has used them in and out of the text of the dream smp to enhance his story telling. With how close CC!Techno and CC!Philza work together I can see Techno's preference for the myths influencing Phil.
Third, Philza literally has used a greek code name in the syndicate, further showing that the greek myths are being drawn on.
What does this mean in dream smp?
This would mean that C! Kristin can both be death, and not be at fault for limbo. She could be the nice, is mischievous, deity the fandom desires her to be without having the implications of limbo looming over her.
Still want angst with though? Use the Ghosts! you can headcannon why Death lets these remnants remain rather than ushering them to the afterlife. Is it because the two main ghosts we have seen (ghostboo and ghostbur) are close to the angel of death? Is it a way of keeping Philza's loved ones close to him? Could she just not bear to keep them way from the world her loved one is in?
Afterthoughts:
Something interesting to note is that Philza's design is often reminiscent of Thanatos, although this often bleeds into Kristin's design.
Thanatos's brother is Hypnos, god of sleep, could be expanded out to Dream XD with XD's relationship with nightmares?
Thanatos is the god of peaceful death, as opposed to keres, the goddess(ess?) who personified violent deaths. (but cannot kill interestingly enough). Could play with this as both Ranboo and Wilbur let themselves die in one way or another. Could this place them in the Thanatos bracket rather that the Keres despite the fact they died by the sword? The non ghost deaths(or later ghost) are Tommy and Mexican Dream who where both flat out killed. Could the 'Keres' of the world not allow ghosts while the 'Thanatos' (C!Kristin) does?
just interesting thoughts :)
19 notes · View notes
boonbeenblade · 2 years
Note
struggling a bit w/your content because it seems awfully sympathetic to c!awesamedude and insofar as itself there's no problem w/but it doesn't seem as though you extend the same to the other abusers.
....
I'm struggling a bit to come up with a response that doesn't make me either look or feel like an asshole, considering you're coming in here on anon with no skin in the game, throwing a heavy accusation, and then dipping. You saw me admitting to an emotional vulnerability about my recent content and decided to kick me while I was down, for some reason. I have a feeling you're not even someone who engages with my content regularly in the first place; if you are, I'm sorry that I've somehow set you off so far from something you used to enjoy.
So. Get a rant. Going under a cut to not clog dashes. I have no idea if the original anon will see this, or care, but it's here.
1. I do not consider myself sympathetic to C!sam. I find him fascinating to analyze the WHY of his spiral into his current state. Doesn't mean I agree with his choices - allowing torture in the prison was god-awful and his hands AREN'T clean of that choice no matter what Sam tells himself, his treatment of Ponk before, during, and after the keycard incident is monstrous and holier-than-thou, his adherence to rules and desperation for power in the form of control indirectly caused Tommy's death and Ghostbur's and he deserves a level of culpability, and he murdered Ranboo after locking him in prison and threatening him with the implication of having kidnapped and being willing to murder his child. I don't know where you get "awfully sympathetic" from me taking the point of view that hey, he might not be okay from being forced to eat himself by his once-best friends locking him in isolation with a mind controlling beast for two days. I have written about him a lot recently because a lot of recent things have included him, and because I have COMPLEX feelings on him that I MYSELF am trying to work out. Hell, part of the reason I wrote "Hungry" is because I've been chewing my own cheek to a mess, and it made me think about the Egg incident. I'm sorry if you don't like reading about c!Sam; I tag things as thoroughly as I can so you can block, or you can just quietly stop reading my content.
2. You say plural for "other abusers", so I'm running down the list of who all you could mean, and there's only a few options that could come into play. The definition of "abuser" is charged and often inaccurately thrown around, so I'm going to list the reasons why a person might be labeled a "villain" instead for the following list. Quackity (extensive torture, heavy manipulation, destruction of property, manslaughter by negligence if you take his word re: Foolish) - I would argue that my content has been MORE sympathetic towards him than towards Sam, against your point, but I definitely don't consider him Heroic either. Wilbur Soot (political manipulation, destruction of property) - Content more sympathetic than towards Sam, also a bit less of it overall in living context (I almost have written about him more dead than alive, and I would argue that his crimes aren't nearly as PERSONAL as some of the others on this list. And I do NOTHING if not hold out for a positive angle for him. Technoblade (destruction of property, murder) - I DEFINITELY portray him more positively than I do Sam. He's my second favorite character behind Tubbo, and I have written EXTENSIVELY about him, often positive. I'd probably be considered a c!Techno apologist (even if it's more that I find him fascinating to analyze and can follow the events that lead him to his less good choices). Philza (destruction of property, murder, giving a child bad advice) - My relationship to c!Philza is...complicated. Honestly, I think my view on him has soured over time, rather than improved as it has with a lot of the others. I've probably given him more benefit of the doubt than he deserves in certain aspects, but I still do approach him with "WHY is he doing this" as opposed to "HOW DARE he do this". Schlatt (murder by execution, political manipulation, implied domestic abuse w Quackity) - Yeah, I don't portray this man positively, but one of the fun things about c!Schlatt is that he never pretended to be anything BUT a villain. He was more...camp, as it were, and that's FUN. Sometimes you allow someone to just go to their full extent, and it's a train wreck, and it's enjoyable to watch. Badboyhalo (mass manipulation, manslaughter (skeppy), celebration of a child's death, murder by execution, attempted conversion through kidnapping and isolation and a form of torture) - Having not directly watched as much of the Egg content while it was running as the others, I will admit to a bit of a mixed view. But I find the concept of post-Egg c!Bad INCREDIBLE. A man so forcibly in denial about the culpability for his actions, a man who has to face the fact that he threw away the world to save his soul-mate and then went and KILLED him, a man struggling to piece together who he is after not being himself for so long??? That's meta GOLD, and I find him GREAT to analyze. And his time as a villain was both camp and existential in a way I enjoy.
But I know that's not what you mean. You mean one, singular other person. The only villain that is UNIVERSALLY agreed on the term "abuser" applying. so.
3. C!Dream. I will be honest. I don't like C!Dream. While his character is interesting, there has been recently less of it to work with than some of the other characters, and my distaste for discussing him is going to come out in being written about less. (I don't personally like Staged Finale, though I accept its canon, and I understand its importance to some people.) And it's only more recently, through the eyes of some VERY well-reasoned and patient C!Dream enthusiasts, that I've come around to finding him interesting to analyze and understand the way I've been approaching others. But see, that's part of the thing. My portrayal of him is "less sympathetic" because I DON'T WRITE ABOUT HIM THAT MUCH. I HAVEN'T EXPLORED AS MANY OF THE AVENUES. I've gone back through my blog, looking at every fic I tagged as having enough intentional C!Dream content to be relevant. 13. 13 out of 211. That is JUST over 6% of the stories in my daily fics. How are you so sure about my impressions of him during that time compared to the others? And in fact, one of my favorite ones I've ever written, In Hiding, is not only c!Dream sympathetic in the portrayal of his attitude during Techno's escape from prison, but it's specifically c!Sam negative in the portrayal. Like. That one sound right up your alley.
I don't like writing about what happened in Exile. I like to make sure my details are as on point as they can be, and reviewing those vods makes me physically uncomfortable to do. So I'm sorry if I'm not combing them for every scrap of sympathy for the man.
------
To end this, I want to say that I hope you're coming at this from a good place. I HOPE you're coming at this from the angle of "Every character deserves to be seen in a positive light", and you're defensive about some of the way that some characters have been treated. I hope that, if you take the time to read this, you understand that I come at these daily metas with an attempt to appreciate the work that every CC puts into their character, and that is brought out of them by the nature of the world. I apologize if any of this is defensive, or harshly worded.
But the approach you made was very harmful, and on a worse night, could have gotten me to stop writing all together. I'm grateful for the support system I do have, and the food that I have here that helped emotionally balance me in the moment. Someone less sure of themselves could have taken this worse. Please, consider how you talk to people. Treat people like they come with the best of intentions, first. Don't assume the worst in people.
In the end, it's a block game, made by a group of friends. I think we need to remember that.
3 notes · View notes
dracoria-azucar · 3 years
Note
Please give me the C!Techno critical analysis I know you have, please
Honestly? I don't feel like I have any "hot takes" about C!Techno that others haven't already expanded upon in what are likely much more comprehensive posts. But here I go! Rant time! 
 I agree with all of the general C!Techno critical takes, except maybe that he's wholly responsible for C!Tubbo's execution.
Because in that instance I feel like he should be framed with the same level of blame as C!Sam is for C!Tommy + Ghostbur's prison deaths. In which. It wasn't his fault? But he definitely had a large role in it. He could've stopped it BUT whether or not he was in a position to actually do anything about it is, debatable. 
Because it's incredibly likely, in both scenarios, that there would've been serious repercussions dished out by the people ACTUALLY responsible (aka Schlatt + Dream) for preventing it. 
But because they chose to be complicit we never actually got to weigh which would've been the better option. 
And despite the fact that I don't believe it was entirely his fault, he did shrug off the implications of it to an unacceptable degree. Like. He publicly executed one of his allies at the enemies request. And then, despite attempting to make a case for himself having been under duress, immediately turned and unloaded shots into a crowd of innocents with no provocation. 
 Just, generally speaking, I feel like a lot of my grievances about his character come from his inability to look past what he views as "black and white". Cuz like. 
A lot of his discourse with C!Tommy was not at all one sided. He repeatedly hid things from Tommy during their team up following Exile. Many could go as far as to say he made the kid feel unsafe/unwanted? Which probably wasn't intentional! But still very much impacted their relationship. 
And literally everything about the "original" betrayal was just C!Wilbur purposefully misleading both of them to get what he wanted. He promised Tommy that he WOULDN'T blow up L'Manburg. He also requested that Techno help him cause chaos. And then he promised C!Dream that he WOULD blow up L'Manburg. So all of that was confusing! 
Ultimately, as much as Techno would like to claim he was clear about his intentions, Tommy was also just as clear about his. They both just decided to ignore the warning signs of inevitable mutual destruction because they cared so much about one another, they were sure the other would just eventually change their mind. 
I don't think Techno is a bad guy. But he's definitely got a warped sense of justice and has proven to be a bit of a hypocrite. Which is a dangerous mix, considering that he's one of the most capable fighters on the server. 
If he REALLY wants something, there's really no one that could stop him.
And that's scary because while he's shown he isn't a VILLAIN he's also pretty bad at reading the room and quick to jump on people he's got a bad history with. The fact that he's willing to work with Dream and uninterested in communicating with the people who've wronged him in the past will probably lead to some terrible things lmao
18 notes · View notes