#actually youd think whoever makes the vids would want to include the other instances of Lady Loki™

[gargoylelads]

(because i've been watching youtube videos and having loki on the mind-) is anyone else a bit weirded out how, when people making theory or other such videos talk about lady loki, especially recently with lady loki in disney+ series looking like more of a real possibility, they only ever mention the "loki in sif's body" backstory? which yes, is a canon "explanation", shall we say, of lady loki but it's not the only one, and it's certainly not the most recent one? idk it's just strange to me because like you can mention both??

I guess that they would maybe view it as the 'origin' for that iteration of Loki? Maybe it's because when some people hear 'lady loki' the image that comes to mind is of the sif lady Loki and not the one from AoA. But yeah for sure weird to just not mention AoA Loki at all :/

#Actually now that I think about it it might be bc Loki's genderfluidity was what was focused on in AoA to kind of tie in with the themes of #identity and self-determination #But in the sif lady loki comic Loki being a woman was more plot relevant #but it didn't do the same job AoA did of making loki more of an antihero than a villain #also i think it could be bc theres still subsets of ppl who just. dont acknowledge lokis genderfluidity #and find it easier to just sweep it under the rug and point to the one interation where it was used for a scheme #and ignore the comics where its actually explored or like. straight up stated (lookin @ u squirrel girl <3) #any ways thats my ramblings 4 da day #actually youd think whoever makes the vids would want to include the other instances of Lady Loki™ #for like. accuracy's sake #ok now im done. good talk 🤝 #asks #anon #loki #loki series #loki spoilers #loki series spoilers #idk but im gonna tag as spoilers bc id rather b safe than sorry