Tumgik
#Zionism
ohara-n-brown · 2 days
Text
For those planning to see Sonic The Hedgehog, especially to see Keanu Reeves as Shadow, I would just like to mention:
Keanu Reeves is a Zionist.
He has met and shaken hands with Netanyahu.
Tumblr media
This happened while Keanu was meeting an Israeli producer at the producer's house. The event was seemingly for the Israeli administration to encourage Hollywood elites to make more movies about Israel.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
He was also trained by Special-Op IDF members for John Wick.
For the movie, Keanu was trained by Aaron Cohen. A vocally Zionist ex-Spec-Ops soldier.
Aaron Cohen actively approves of the genocide. Today, 4/17/24 - Cohen posted this on X.
Tumblr media
If you are planning on seeing Sonic 3 - you have a right to know this. The movie may be boycotted in the future, and seeing it might break your boycotting.
This information hasn't been spread enough and since the news dropped I've seen so many people up Reeves' ass, which understandable as he's a very popular actor - but he is not just silent in this genocide, he's clearly picked a side a long time ago.
Please pass on this information if you can. Stay informed and safe y'all.
From the river to the sea. 🍉
905 notes · View notes
vague-humanoid · 17 hours
Text
Tumblr media
786 notes · View notes
opencommunion · 2 days
Text
Tumblr media
2012 poster by Riyad Hamad with Mahmoud Darwish's poem "Think of Others," bringing attention to the Palestinian prisoners' struggle, and particularly the Zionist regime's deliberate medical neglect of sick and disabled Palestinians held hostage in its prisons. [ID: Illustration in a linocut style printed in black on beige paper, showing a Palestinian prisoner blindfolded with his hands cuffed behind his back. He stands in the light from a small barred window with barbed wire beyond it. Behind him is an IV dispenser, the bag is nearly empty. The Arabic text of the poem is printed at an angle in the dark space. /end ID]
317 notes · View notes
Text
Palestinian activists in Ontario are asking you to email your reps about Bill 166. The wording of the bill is extremely vague, but it seems like the Ford government wants to open itself the possibility to meddle in mental health services provided by Universities and to change their anti-racism policies. It is very likely - with the timing - that these policy changes are going to be saught to arrest / institutionalize Palestinians for divulge during therapy, or to deny them service altogether. They want to control University campus mental healthcare, something no other province does.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
@newsfromstolenland, @vague-humanoid
319 notes · View notes
sissa-arrows · 2 days
Text
Yesterday in France the groups Stop Arming Israel and Tsedek! (Anti colonialism Jewish group that has been attacked and censored multiple times in France) organized a small protest to block Thales a firm who manufacture weapons that are sold to “Israel”.
Somebody driving a black car tried to run over them. They didn’t slow down and drove slowly past the group or anything. They were driving fast so it was on purpose.
There’s a video and the license plate is fully visible on it. So if the cops or media wanna do anything about it they easily can but strangely I’m convinced they won’t cause I saw nothing about it on the news. I actually learned about it accidentally.
Edit: For the people asking to my knowledge there was no physical injuries. Tsedek! Didn’t mention anyone getting injured and on the video it looks like everyone was able to avoid the car. Also the amount of Zionist regretting that none of the protesters were physically injured is very telling when you know that a lot of the people protesting were Jewish. Also Stop arming Israel announced that they contacted their lawyers with the video and the license plate of the car cause they don’t plan on letting the whole go unpunished.
Edit 2: Here is Tsedek! Tweet about what happened with the video. If you scroll up a bit on Tsedek! Profile you will see Stop Arming Israel’s tweet too.
210 notes · View notes
girlactionfigure · 3 days
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
103 notes · View notes
Text
Okay question for people! Because I feel like there's a huge fucking misunderstanding (this is an understatment but I'll talk more about that if need be)
Edit: by Israel I mean the current goverment and its actions
Edit two: having a state means to have a goverment, in this case it means Jewish peoples right to a goverment lead by fellow Jewish people
59 notes · View notes
Note
hey icon, hope your day is going well! was wondering if you had seen the open letter against scholasticide (in addition to everything else, obviously) in gaza, signed by over 2k north american university professors? (my uni's entire history department signed, so sexy of them.) hadn't seen word of it circulate on here, but seemed like something up your alley, the type of news/action that intersects with your usual posting! stay cool, and hope you get some sun where you are x
I hadn't, but I'll share it below.
OPEN LETTER FROM NORTH AMERICAN ACADEMICS CONDEMNING SCHOLASTICIDE IN GAZA
39 notes · View notes
mxdae · 2 days
Text
Yeah, wine-effectao3 blocked me, so I'm going to post the source that you've asked for here, @antongarou
And that's not the only genocide Israel had participated in over the years.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/25762120
And for all the screeching zionists do about how Israel is a Jewish homeland, zionists definitely seem like they don't want all Jewish populations to flourish.
23 notes · View notes
memingursa · 3 days
Text
Tumblr media
Incredible.
21 notes · View notes
thebusylilbee · 3 days
Text
"oh Iran's response to Israel bombing their embassy was so excessive, there could have been thousands of casualties ! thousands ! :'(" the zionist cunts have literally killed 30 000 palestinians so far IS THAT NOT EXCESSIVE TO YOU DAVID "PIG FUCKER" CAMERON ??? EXPLODE INTO A THOUSAND FUCKING PIECES YOU RACIST WHITE BAG OF GARBAGE
18 notes · View notes
alwaysbewoke · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
shit the western media won't show you
59K notes · View notes
vague-humanoid · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
Rich Siegel, Jewish resident of Teaneck, NJ, at Township Council meeting
Tumblr media
23K notes · View notes
opencommunion · 3 days
Text
When I refer to zionists as textbook genocide denialists, btw, I'm talking about literal textbooks I was assigned in my genocide studies classes. Here's an excerpt from one, Genocide: A Comprehensive Introduction by Adam Jones, detailing common genocide denialist arguments. I've bolded arguments that I've personally heard from zionists (including ‘neutral’ fence-sitters, who are on the side of the oppressor by default) — during the current Gaza genocide, but also in reference to the entire history of the genocidal zionist occupation. It's important to learn to recognize these arguments and call them what they are, genocide denial, rather than excusing denialists as simply misinformed or misguided.
"Among the most common discourses of genocide denial are the following: 'Hardly anybody died.' Reports of atrocities and mass killings are depicted as exaggerated and self-serving. ... Photographic and video evidence is dismissed as fake or staged. Gaps in physical evidence are exploited, particularly an absence of corpses. Where are the bodies of the Jews killed by the Nazis? (Incinerated, conveniently for the deniers.) Where are the bodies of the thousands of Kosovars supposedly killed by Serbs in 1999? (Buried on military and police bases, or dumped in rivers and down mineshafts, as it transpired.) When the genocides lie far in the past, obfuscation is easier. Genocides of indigenous peoples are especially subject to this form of denial. In many cases, the groups in question suffered near-total extermination, leaving few descendants and advocates to press the case for truth. 'It was self-defense.' 'The onset of [genocidal] killing,' wrote Jacques Sémelin, 'almost always seems to involve this astounding sleight of hand that assimilates the destruction of civilians with a perfectly legitimate act of war. From that moment on, massacre becomes an act of self-defense.' Murdered civilians - especially adult males – are depicted as 'rebels,' 'brigands,' 'partisans,' 'terrorists.' The state and its allies are justified in eliminating them, though unfortunate 'excesses' may occur. Deniers of the Armenian genocide, for example, play up the presence of armed elements and resistance among the Armenian population – even clearly defensive resistance. ... Genocide may also be depicted as an act of pre-emptive self-defense, based on atrocities, actual or alleged, inflicted on the perpetrator group in the past – sometimes the very distant past. Sémelin, for example, has explained Serbs’ 'insensitivit[y] to the suffering they caused' in the Balkan genocide of the 1990s in terms of their inability to perceive any but 'their own woes' ... A substrategy of this discourse is the claim that 'the violence was mutual.' Where genocides occur in a context of civil or international war, they can be depicted as part of generalized warfare, perhaps featuring atrocities on all sides. This strategy is standard among the deniers of genocides by Turks, Japanese, Serbs, Hutus, and West Pakistanis – to name just a few. In Australia, Keith Windschuttle used killings of whites by Aboriginals to denounce 'The Myths of Frontier Massacres in Australian History.' ... Sometimes the deniers seem oblivious to the content of their claims, reflecting deeply embedded stereotypes and genuine ignorance, rather than malicious intent – as with the CNN reporter who blithely referred to the world standing by and 'watch[ing] Hutus and Tutsis kill each other' during the Rwandan genocide of 1994.
'The deaths weren’t intentional.' The difficulties of demonstrating and documenting genocidal intent are exploited to deny that genocide occurred. The utility of this strategy is enhanced where a longer causal chain underpins mass mortality. Thus, when diverse factors combine to cause death, or when supposedly 'natural' elements such as disease and famine account for many or most deaths, a denialist discourse is especially appealing. It buttresses most denials of indigenous genocides, for example. Deniers of the Armenian and Jewish holocausts also contend that most deaths occurred from privations and afflictions that were inevitable, if regrettable, in a wartime context – in any case, not genocidal.
'There was no central direction.' Frequently, states and their agents establish deniability by running off-duty death squads, or employing freelance forces such as paramilitaries (as in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Darfur), criminal elements (e.g., the chétés in the Armenian genocide), and members of the targeted groups themselves (Jewish kapos in the Nazi death camps; Mayan peasants conscripted for genocide against Mayan populations of the Guatemalan highlands). State attempts to eliminate evidence may mean that documentation of central direction, as of genocidal intent, is scarce. Many deniers of the Jewish Holocaust emphasize the lack of a clear order from Hitler or his top associates to exterminate European Jews. Armenian genocide denial similarly centers on the supposed freelance status of those who carried out whatever atrocities are admitted to have occurred.
'There weren’t that many people to begin with.' [*] Where demographic data provide support for claims of genocide, denialists will gravitate towards the lowest available figures for the targeted population, or invent new ones. The effect is to cast doubt on mortality statistics by downplaying the victims’ demographic weight at the outbreak of genocide. This strategy is especially common in denials of genocide against indigenous peoples, as well as the Ottoman genocide of Christian minorities.
'It wasn’t/isn’t genocide, because ...' Here, the ambiguities of the UN Genocide Convention are exploited, and combined with the denial strategies already cited. Atrocious events do not qualify as 'genocide' … because the victims were not members of one of the Convention’s specified groups; because their deaths were unintended; because they were legitimate targets; because 'only' specific sectors of the target group (e.g., 'battle-age' men) were killed; because 'war is hell;' and so on. 'We would never do that.' Collective pathological narcissism occludes recognition, or even conscious consideration, of genocidal culpability. When the state and its citizens consider themselves pure, peaceful, democratic, and lawabiding, responsibility for atrocity may be literally unthinkable. In Turkey, notes Taner Akçam, anyone 'dar[ing] to speak about the Armenian Genocide ... is aggressively attacked as a traitor, singled out for public condemnation and may even be put in prison.' In Australia, 'the very mention of an Australian genocide is … appalling and galling and must be put aside,' according to Colin Tatz. 'A curious national belief is that simply being Australian, whether by birth or naturalisation, is sufficient inoculation against deviation from moral and righteous behaviour.' Comedian Rob Corddry parodied this mindset in the context of US abuses and atrocities at Abu Ghraib prison near Baghdad. 'There’s no question what took place in that prison was horrible,' Corddry said on The Daily Show. 'But the Arab world has to realize that the US shouldn’t be judged on the actions of a ... well, we shouldn’t be judged on actions. It’s our principles that matter, our inspiring, abstract notions. Remember: just because torturing prisoners is something we did, doesn’t mean it’s something we would do.'
'We are the real victims.' For deniers, the best defense is often a strong offense. With its 'Day of Fallen Diplomats,' Turkey uses Armenian terrorist attacks against Turkish diplomatic staff to pre-empt attention to the Turkish genocide against Armenians. In the case of Germany and the Nazi Holocaust, there is a point at which a victim mentality concentrating on German suffering leads to the horrors that Germans inflicted, on Jews and others, being downgraded or denied. In the Balkans, a discourse of genocide was first deployed by Serb intellectuals promoting a nationalist–xenophobic project; the only 'genocide' admitted was that against Serbs, whether by Croatians in the Second World War (which indeed occurred), or in Kosovo at the hands of the Albanian majority (which was a paranoid fantasy). Notably, this stress on victimhood provided powerful fuel for unleashing the genocides in the first place." * Zionists make two demographic claims to deny genocide, and specifically to deny the Nakba: the first parallels what Jones says here — that there weren't many (or even any) Palestinians ("Arabs") in Palestine to begin with, and/or mass expulsions were actually voluntary migration. The second is a reversal, where zionists point to demographic data and claim that Palestinian population growth must mean genocide never occurred (as if genocide survivors aren't capable of having children). For further reading on Nakba denial specifically, Nur Masalha's work is a good place to start, especially The Palestine Nakba (2012), Politics of Denial (2003), A Land Without A People (1997), and Expulsion of the Palestinians (1992).
154 notes · View notes
intersectionalpraxis · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
I also learned this today about her:
Tumblr media
Palestine will be free!
14K notes · View notes
tikkunolamresistance · 3 months
Text
Here is a masterlist of every single genocidal statement made by the State of Israel, all appropriately quoted and sourced.
These statements cannot be retracted.
Tumblr media
Quote from the Israeli State Minister of Agriculture and Development.
And yet, Zionists will tell you that “This is not a genocide, Hamas are using Palestinians as human shields!”
14K notes · View notes