#Racer Jumping Hour GMT
Photo
Following the successful Racer Jumping Hour GMT, released in 2021, Anton Suhanov is presenting the Racer Retro. The new 28-piece limited edition was inspired by classic and vintage cars and the emotions they evoke in fans and collectors. The model maintains the Caliber Su100.25, an automatic movement with three retrograde indications, date and GMT, with a module created on an ETA 2824-2 base. The black dial has four cutouts and is decorated with guilloché. . Após o sucesso do Racer Jumping Hour GMT, lançado em 2021, Anton Suhanov apresenta o Racer Retro. A nova edição limitada de 28 peças do relógio foi inspirada em carros clássicos e antigos e nas emoções que eles evocam em fãs e colecionadores. O modelo mantém o Calibre Su100.25, movimento automático com três indicações retrógradas, data e GMT, sendo um módulo criado sobre uma base ETA 2824-2. O mostrador preto recebeu quatro aberturas e é decorado com guilloché. 📷 @anton.suhanov • • #antonsuhanov #racerretro #independentwatchmaking #antonsuhanovracerretro #ahci #finewatchmaking #hautehorlogerie #racerwatch #relogioserelogios https://www.instagram.com/p/CqLpCPcuzRX/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=
#antonsuhanov#racerretro#independentwatchmaking#antonsuhanovracerretro#ahci#finewatchmaking#hautehorlogerie#racerwatch#relogioserelogios
9 notes
·
View notes
Text
Racer Jumping Hour GMT by Anton Suhanov
Racer Jumping Hour GMT by Anton Suhanov
View On WordPress
#Anton Suhanov#independent brand#independent watchmaker#independent watchmaking#news#Press release#Racer Jumping Hour GMT#Racer Jumping Hour GMT by Anton Suhanov#Russian watchmaking
0 notes
Text
Top Six Rolex Watches to Shop in 2020
Rolex's organizer, Hans Wilsdorf, was onto something when he made his organization logo a crown – it has remained the lord of watch brands for over a century. Its colossal image value is halfway in light of the fact that Rolex gives so minimal away, a key to its persona. It is often positioned first in quite a while of super-brands in the UK and is inhabitant in Forbes' rundown of the world's most impressive brands. Request that 100 individuals name an extravagance watch and the vast majority of them will say Rolex.
What makes Rolex so special? The nature of its plans. The uncommonness of its materials. What's more, in particular, the brand's immaculate creation measure that ensures exact and precise exhibitions.
Every one of these basics assume a significant function in Rolex's notoriety. In any case, there is substantially more to the brand. Other watch makers, for example, Patek Philippe and Audemars Piguet are similarly adept at delivering great watches.
Here are the best Rolex watches to shop so you can perceive any reason why this amazing watchmaker is as loved as it seems to be.
1. Rolex Day-Date II President 18K Yellow Gold Watch
The Rolex Day-Date made its presentation in 1956 and was the principal wristwatch to show both the date and the day of the week illuminated in full in windows on the dial. Today, the Day-Date is accessible in various varieties including this 18k Yellow Gold style. Ideal for compelling gentlemen, this watch is sumptuous and exceptionally exact. Its 40mm case includes a fluted 18k gold bezel and houses a champagne dial with precious stone hour markers. The wristband, known as the President arm band, was made for the dispatch and speaks to a definitive in refinement and solace. This model is additionally outfitted with a 3255 gauge programmed development and is water-impervious to 100 meter.
2. Rolex Cosmograph Daytona
So mainstream that it has been underway since 1963, the Cosmograph Daytona was initially promoted to racecar drivers, and as you may have speculated, is named out of appreciation for Daytona, Florida, one of the world's vehicle hustling capitals. Because of its striking, manly tasteful, Daytona is one of the most famous men's Rolex models.
Sub-dials give the Daytona's face an exceptionally energetic appearance, and there are numerous varieties to find as you become more acquainted with these watches. There's one more thing you should think about the Cosmograph Daytona: other than being extraordinary compared to other selling Rolex models, time, it highlights precise, solid tachymeter and chronograph scales that permit racers to gauge their speed, up to a bewildering 400 kilometers for each hour. On the off chance that you esteem speed and execution just as extravagance, at that point the Daytona very well might be the privilege Rolex for you.
3. Rolex GMT-Master II ‘Pepsi’
A GMT Rolex is a definitive adventurer's watch, regardless of whether that idea exists just in principle at this moment. Presented in 1955 with the notable red and white 24-hour scale on the bezel, it earned the moniker 'Pepsi'. (A red and dark 'Coke' showed up in 1983). The latest form in steel includes a best in class development and a dressier 'celebration' wristband. Other than that, the structure has changed little in 60 years – however you can document this under immortal, as opposed to vintage.
4. Cosmograph Daytona
The entrancing Rolex Daytona dial was acquainted in 1963 with praise the high‑performance universe of expert race vehicle driving. The model quickly picked up prevalence among famous actors and the terrific open on the loose.
The Cosmograph Daytona characterized a whole watch classification among sports chronographs. Its dial has become a symbol frequently celebrated and recreated by other watch brands.
Two little pushers on the right-hand side of the watch permit the wearer to initiate the chronograph work. The pushers can be in a bad way down to ensure waterproofness to 100 meters (330 feet).
5. Rolex Explorer II White Automatic Stainless Steel Watch
Encapsulating the connection among Rolex and investigation, this Rolex Explorer II is exact, solid, and clear. The jazzy structure includes a treated steel case and hardened steel Oyster arm band. Moreover, the fixed bezel is made of hardened steel and highlights 24-hour markings. The moderate yet boldface includes a spotless white dial with formed hour markers, brilliant hands, and a date show at the 3 o'clock position. It additionally includes minute markers around the external edge to let you know precisely what the time is. This useful and stylish watch, which flaunts a programmed development, is water-impervious to 100m, implying that it's reasonable for swimming and swimming yet not jumping.
6. Rolex Cellini 50525 Multiple Time Zone Watch in 18K Rose Gold
The Cellini may simply be one of the most snazzy Rolex observes ever constructed. The mark promotes the assortment as a contemporary festival of style and the everlasting class of conventional watches. This model adheres to that invigorated legacy stylish and highlights a 18k rose gold case and dark croc calfskin band. Its dial is a sharp dark structure with stick markers and highlights a subdial for an auxiliary time region show. On head of that, this cleaned and refined bit of configuration brags the elevated requirement flawlessness for which Rolex is known with a Swiss programmed development and 50 meters of water opposition.
Behind the brand, the Rolex Company works in an altogether different manner from a large portion of the other watch producers on the planet. The organization is secretly held and is set up as a foundation. On the off chance that we looking at shopping Rolex Watches in UK, at that point Rolex is presently positioning number two of the most well known extravagance brands in UK.
0 notes
Text
Understanding smartwatches
I was wrong. Several years ago I reviewed the first Garmin Fenix 3 smartwatch. This was before the release of the Apple Watch. That’s key to this story. I declared Garmin would have a hard time selling the Fenix 3. The Apple Watch would be better in every way, I pointed out. Therefore, there would be little reason to buy the Fenix 3.
But here I am, in the middle of the woods, wearing the fifth generation of the Garmin Fenix while my Apple Watch sits at home on my desk.
In some ways I was right. The Apple Watch is better by most measurable attributes: there are more apps, the screen is superior, there’s a vibrant accessory market, and it’s thinner, faster and cheaper.
The Garmin Fenix is big, clunky and the screen looks like it’s from a Kindle. It’s not a touchscreen nor does it have the number of apps or band options of the Apple Watch. I like it. To me, the Garmin Fenix is akin to a modern Casio G-Shock, and that’s what I want to wear right now.
Smartwatches are often reviewed like phones or vacuums. Specs are compared, and conclusions are drawn. Wearability is talked about, and functions are tested. If the watch has a swimming option, take it in a pool never mind the fact the reviewer hasn’t done a lap since high school.
I started out doing the same thing with this Garmin. I took it kayaking. I had kayaked twice in my life, and dear reader, I’m here to report the watch performed well on this kayak trip. The watch has topography maps that novel though not useful since the river. It has a cadence beat to help keep strokes consistent. I tried it all. I ended up drinking a lot of Michigan beer instead of tracking the performance of the watch. Sorry.
Still, performance matters to a point.
Here’s my OG review of the Garmin Fenix 5: The watch is significant even on my wrist. The screen is underwhelming though it’s always on and visibility improves in sunlight. The buttons have great tactical feedback. The watch is waterproof to the extent it survived a flipped kayak and hours in Lake Michigan. The battery lasts nearly a week. The watch does not know when it’s on or off the wrist, so notifications will cause it to buzz while it’s on your nightstand.
But most of that doesn’t matter. The Garmin Fenix 5 is exceptional, and I love wearing it.
Smartwatches need to be reviewed like ordinary watches. I need to explain more about how the watch feels rather than what it does or how it works. At this point, several years into smartwatches, it’s not notable if the smartwatch with a smartwatch. Of course, it tracks steps and heart rate and displays select notifications from my phone. If those items work then, they’re not important in a review.
Take a Citizen Skyhawk line. It packs a highly sophisticated complication that’s designed, so the maker says, for pilots. Ball makes a lovely line intended to provide accurate timekeeping for train conductors. There are watches for high magnetic fields, tactical operators, racer car drivers and, of course, countless for divers. Here’s my point: The vast majority of these watches are not used by divers or train conductors or fighter pilots.
This Garmin Fenix watch, much like the Apple Watch or Rolex diver, can be an aspirational item. It’s like the juicer in my kitchen or rowing machine in my basement. I got it because I wanted to be a person who woke up and juiced some veggies before my workout. I haven’t used either in months.
Smartwatches are different from smartphones and need to be reviewed as such. This Garmin Fenix watch has many modes I would never use, yet I love the watch. There’s a base jumping mode. I’m not jumping off a cliff. There’s a tactical mode and a golf mode and an open water mode, and I have no desire to be in situations where I need to track such activities. But I like the thought of having them available if I ever wanted to monitor my heartbeat while shooting targets.
The smartwatch industry is approaching a point where features are secondary to design. It’s expected that the watch will track steps and heartbeat while providing access to various features. It’s like the time and date of a regular watch. Past that, the watch needs to fit in a person’s aspirations.
Everyone is different, but to me, this is how it is laid out: The Apple Watch is for those looking for the top-tier experience regardless of the downsides of constant charging and delicate exterior. Android Watches are those looking for something similar but in a counter-culture way. The Samsung’s smartwatch is interesting and with the new Galaxy Watch, finally reaching maturity.
There are fashion smartwatches with fewer features but designs that make a statement. That’s where this Garmin watch lives and I’m okay with it. Fossil and Timex watches live here too. Using the Apple Watch as a standard, some of these fashion watches cost more, and some cost less, but they all say something an Apple Watch does not.
I’m bored with the Apple Watch, and right now I’m into thinking I live the type of life that needs a smartwatch that tracks every aspect of a triathlon. I don’t need all these features, but I like to think I do. I also don’t need to have a GMT watch with a third timezone, and I don’t need a watch with a hacking movement hand as if I need to synchronize my watch with other members of my special forces squad. But I have those watches along with dive watches and anti-magnetic watches. I’m not alone. The watch industry has long existed on selling lifestyles.
I was wrong before. The Apple Watch isn’t better than this Garmin or most other smartwatches— at least it’s not better for me right now. Maybe two weeks from now I’ll want to wear an Apple Watch and not because it’s better, but because it makes a different statement.
from All Of Beer http://allofbeer.com/understanding-smartwatches/
from All of Beer https://allofbeercom.tumblr.com/post/183977597982
0 notes
Text
Understanding smartwatches
I was wrong. Several years ago I reviewed the first Garmin Fenix 3 smartwatch. This was before the release of the Apple Watch. That’s key to this story. I declared Garmin would have a hard time selling the Fenix 3. The Apple Watch would be better in every way, I pointed out. Therefore, there would be little reason to buy the Fenix 3.
But here I am, in the middle of the woods, wearing the fifth generation of the Garmin Fenix while my Apple Watch sits at home on my desk.
In some ways I was right. The Apple Watch is better by most measurable attributes: there are more apps, the screen is superior, there’s a vibrant accessory market, and it’s thinner, faster and cheaper.
The Garmin Fenix is big, clunky and the screen looks like it’s from a Kindle. It’s not a touchscreen nor does it have the number of apps or band options of the Apple Watch. I like it. To me, the Garmin Fenix is akin to a modern Casio G-Shock, and that’s what I want to wear right now.
Smartwatches are often reviewed like phones or vacuums. Specs are compared, and conclusions are drawn. Wearability is talked about, and functions are tested. If the watch has a swimming option, take it in a pool never mind the fact the reviewer hasn’t done a lap since high school.
I started out doing the same thing with this Garmin. I took it kayaking. I had kayaked twice in my life, and dear reader, I’m here to report the watch performed well on this kayak trip. The watch has topography maps that novel though not useful since the river. It has a cadence beat to help keep strokes consistent. I tried it all. I ended up drinking a lot of Michigan beer instead of tracking the performance of the watch. Sorry.
Still, performance matters to a point.
Here’s my OG review of the Garmin Fenix 5: The watch is significant even on my wrist. The screen is underwhelming though it’s always on and visibility improves in sunlight. The buttons have great tactical feedback. The watch is waterproof to the extent it survived a flipped kayak and hours in Lake Michigan. The battery lasts nearly a week. The watch does not know when it’s on or off the wrist, so notifications will cause it to buzz while it’s on your nightstand.
But most of that doesn’t matter. The Garmin Fenix 5 is exceptional, and I love wearing it.
Smartwatches need to be reviewed like ordinary watches. I need to explain more about how the watch feels rather than what it does or how it works. At this point, several years into smartwatches, it’s not notable if the smartwatch with a smartwatch. Of course, it tracks steps and heart rate and displays select notifications from my phone. If those items work then, they’re not important in a review.
Take a Citizen Skyhawk line. It packs a highly sophisticated complication that’s designed, so the maker says, for pilots. Ball makes a lovely line intended to provide accurate timekeeping for train conductors. There are watches for high magnetic fields, tactical operators, racer car drivers and, of course, countless for divers. Here’s my point: The vast majority of these watches are not used by divers or train conductors or fighter pilots.
This Garmin Fenix watch, much like the Apple Watch or Rolex diver, can be an aspirational item. It’s like the juicer in my kitchen or rowing machine in my basement. I got it because I wanted to be a person who woke up and juiced some veggies before my workout. I haven’t used either in months.
Smartwatches are different from smartphones and need to be reviewed as such. This Garmin Fenix watch has many modes I would never use, yet I love the watch. There’s a base jumping mode. I’m not jumping off a cliff. There’s a tactical mode and a golf mode and an open water mode, and I have no desire to be in situations where I need to track such activities. But I like the thought of having them available if I ever wanted to monitor my heartbeat while shooting targets.
The smartwatch industry is approaching a point where features are secondary to design. It’s expected that the watch will track steps and heartbeat while providing access to various features. It’s like the time and date of a regular watch. Past that, the watch needs to fit in a person’s aspirations.
Everyone is different, but to me, this is how it is laid out: The Apple Watch is for those looking for the top-tier experience regardless of the downsides of constant charging and delicate exterior. Android Watches are those looking for something similar but in a counter-culture way. The Samsung’s smartwatch is interesting and with the new Galaxy Watch, finally reaching maturity.
There are fashion smartwatches with fewer features but designs that make a statement. That’s where this Garmin watch lives and I’m okay with it. Fossil and Timex watches live here too. Using the Apple Watch as a standard, some of these fashion watches cost more, and some cost less, but they all say something an Apple Watch does not.
I’m bored with the Apple Watch, and right now I’m into thinking I live the type of life that needs a smartwatch that tracks every aspect of a triathlon. I don’t need all these features, but I like to think I do. I also don’t need to have a GMT watch with a third timezone, and I don’t need a watch with a hacking movement hand as if I need to synchronize my watch with other members of my special forces squad. But I have those watches along with dive watches and anti-magnetic watches. I’m not alone. The watch industry has long existed on selling lifestyles.
I was wrong before. The Apple Watch isn’t better than this Garmin or most other smartwatches— at least it’s not better for me right now. Maybe two weeks from now I’ll want to wear an Apple Watch and not because it’s better, but because it makes a different statement.
Source: http://allofbeer.com/understanding-smartwatches/
from All of Beer https://allofbeer.wordpress.com/2019/04/06/understanding-smartwatches/
0 notes
Text
Understanding smartwatches
I was wrong. Several years ago I reviewed the first Garmin Fenix 3 smartwatch. This was before the release of the Apple Watch. That’s key to this story. I declared Garmin would have a hard time selling the Fenix 3. The Apple Watch would be better in every way, I pointed out. Therefore, there would be little reason to buy the Fenix 3.
But here I am, in the middle of the woods, wearing the fifth generation of the Garmin Fenix while my Apple Watch sits at home on my desk.
In some ways I was right. The Apple Watch is better by most measurable attributes: there are more apps, the screen is superior, there’s a vibrant accessory market, and it’s thinner, faster and cheaper.
The Garmin Fenix is big, clunky and the screen looks like it’s from a Kindle. It’s not a touchscreen nor does it have the number of apps or band options of the Apple Watch. I like it. To me, the Garmin Fenix is akin to a modern Casio G-Shock, and that’s what I want to wear right now.
Smartwatches are often reviewed like phones or vacuums. Specs are compared, and conclusions are drawn. Wearability is talked about, and functions are tested. If the watch has a swimming option, take it in a pool never mind the fact the reviewer hasn’t done a lap since high school.
I started out doing the same thing with this Garmin. I took it kayaking. I had kayaked twice in my life, and dear reader, I’m here to report the watch performed well on this kayak trip. The watch has topography maps that novel though not useful since the river. It has a cadence beat to help keep strokes consistent. I tried it all. I ended up drinking a lot of Michigan beer instead of tracking the performance of the watch. Sorry.
Still, performance matters to a point.
Here’s my OG review of the Garmin Fenix 5: The watch is significant even on my wrist. The screen is underwhelming though it’s always on and visibility improves in sunlight. The buttons have great tactical feedback. The watch is waterproof to the extent it survived a flipped kayak and hours in Lake Michigan. The battery lasts nearly a week. The watch does not know when it’s on or off the wrist, so notifications will cause it to buzz while it’s on your nightstand.
But most of that doesn’t matter. The Garmin Fenix 5 is exceptional, and I love wearing it.
Smartwatches need to be reviewed like ordinary watches. I need to explain more about how the watch feels rather than what it does or how it works. At this point, several years into smartwatches, it’s not notable if the smartwatch with a smartwatch. Of course, it tracks steps and heart rate and displays select notifications from my phone. If those items work then, they’re not important in a review.
Take a Citizen Skyhawk line. It packs a highly sophisticated complication that’s designed, so the maker says, for pilots. Ball makes a lovely line intended to provide accurate timekeeping for train conductors. There are watches for high magnetic fields, tactical operators, racer car drivers and, of course, countless for divers. Here’s my point: The vast majority of these watches are not used by divers or train conductors or fighter pilots.
This Garmin Fenix watch, much like the Apple Watch or Rolex diver, can be an aspirational item. It’s like the juicer in my kitchen or rowing machine in my basement. I got it because I wanted to be a person who woke up and juiced some veggies before my workout. I haven’t used either in months.
Smartwatches are different from smartphones and need to be reviewed as such. This Garmin Fenix watch has many modes I would never use, yet I love the watch. There’s a base jumping mode. I’m not jumping off a cliff. There’s a tactical mode and a golf mode and an open water mode, and I have no desire to be in situations where I need to track such activities. But I like the thought of having them available if I ever wanted to monitor my heartbeat while shooting targets.
The smartwatch industry is approaching a point where features are secondary to design. It’s expected that the watch will track steps and heartbeat while providing access to various features. It’s like the time and date of a regular watch. Past that, the watch needs to fit in a person’s aspirations.
Everyone is different, but to me, this is how it is laid out: The Apple Watch is for those looking for the top-tier experience regardless of the downsides of constant charging and delicate exterior. Android Watches are those looking for something similar but in a counter-culture way. The Samsung’s smartwatch is interesting and with the new Galaxy Watch, finally reaching maturity.
There are fashion smartwatches with fewer features but designs that make a statement. That’s where this Garmin watch lives and I’m okay with it. Fossil and Timex watches live here too. Using the Apple Watch as a standard, some of these fashion watches cost more, and some cost less, but they all say something an Apple Watch does not.
I’m bored with the Apple Watch, and right now I’m into thinking I live the type of life that needs a smartwatch that tracks every aspect of a triathlon. I don’t need all these features, but I like to think I do. I also don’t need to have a GMT watch with a third timezone, and I don’t need a watch with a hacking movement hand as if I need to synchronize my watch with other members of my special forces squad. But I have those watches along with dive watches and anti-magnetic watches. I’m not alone. The watch industry has long existed on selling lifestyles.
I was wrong before. The Apple Watch isn’t better than this Garmin or most other smartwatches— at least it’s not better for me right now. Maybe two weeks from now I’ll want to wear an Apple Watch and not because it’s better, but because it makes a different statement.
from All Of Beer http://allofbeer.com/understanding-smartwatches/
0 notes
Link
I was wrong. Several years ago I reviewed the first Garmin Fenix 3 smartwatch. This was before the release of the Apple Watch. That’s key to this story. I declared Garmin would have a hard time selling the Fenix 3. The Apple Watch would be better in every way, I pointed out. Therefore, there would be little reason to buy the Fenix 3.
But here I am, in the middle of the woods, wearing the fifth generation of the Garmin Fenix while my Apple Watch sits at home on my desk.
In some ways I was right. The Apple Watch is better by most measurable attributes: there are more apps, the screen is superior, there’s a vibrant accessory market, and it’s thinner, faster and cheaper.
The Garmin Fenix is big, clunky and the screen looks like it’s from a Kindle. It’s not a touchscreen nor does it have the number of apps or band options of the Apple Watch. I like it. To me, the Garmin Fenix is akin to a modern Casio G-Shock, and that’s what I want to wear right now.
Smartwatches are often reviewed like phones or vacuums. Specs are compared, and conclusions are drawn. Wearability is talked about, and functions are tested. If the watch has a swimming option, take it in a pool never mind the fact the reviewer hasn’t done a lap since high school.
I started out doing the same thing with this Garmin. I took it kayaking. I had kayaked twice in my life, and dear reader, I’m here to report the watch performed well on this kayak trip. The watch has topography maps that novel though not useful since the river. It has a cadence beat to help keep strokes consistent. I tried it all. I ended up drinking a lot of Michigan beer instead of tracking the performance of the watch. Sorry.
Still, performance matters to a point.
Here’s my OG review of the Garmin Fenix 5: The watch is significant even on my wrist. The screen is underwhelming though it’s always on and visibility improves in sunlight. The buttons have great tactical feedback. The watch is waterproof to the extent it survived a flipped kayak and hours in Lake Michigan. The battery lasts nearly a week. The watch does not know when it’s on or off the wrist, so notifications will cause it to buzz while it’s on your nightstand.
But most of that doesn’t matter. The Garmin Fenix 5 is exceptional, and I love wearing it.
Smartwatches need to be reviewed like ordinary watches. I need to explain more about how the watch feels rather than what it does or how it works. At this point, several years into smartwatches, it’s not notable if the smartwatch with a smartwatch. Of course, it tracks steps and heart rate and displays select notifications from my phone. If those items work then, they’re not important in a review.
Take a Citizen Skyhawk line. It packs a highly sophisticated complication that’s designed, so the maker says, for pilots. Ball makes a lovely line intended to provide accurate timekeeping for train conductors. There are watches for high magnetic fields, tactical operators, racer car drivers and, of course, countless for divers. Here’s my point: The vast majority of these watches are not used by divers or train conductors or fighter pilots.
This Garmin Fenix watch, much like the Apple Watch or Rolex diver, can be an aspirational item. It’s like the juicer in my kitchen or rowing machine in my basement. I got it because I wanted to be a person who woke up and juiced some veggies before my workout. I haven’t used either in months.
Smartwatches are different from smartphones and need to be reviewed as such. This Garmin Fenix watch has many modes I would never use, yet I love the watch. There’s a base jumping mode. I’m not jumping off a cliff. There’s a tactical mode and a golf mode and an open water mode, and I have no desire to be in situations where I need to track such activities. But I like the thought of having them available if I ever wanted to monitor my heartbeat while shooting targets.
The smartwatch industry is approaching a point where features are secondary to design. It’s expected that the watch will track steps and heartbeat while providing access to various features. It’s like the time and date of a regular watch. Past that, the watch needs to fit in a person’s aspirations.
Everyone is different, but to me, this is how it is laid out: The Apple Watch is for those looking for the top-tier experience regardless of the downsides of constant charging and delicate exterior. Android Watches are those looking for something similar but in a counter-culture way. The Samsung’s smartwatch is interesting and with the new Galaxy Watch, finally reaching maturity.
There are fashion smartwatches with fewer features but designs that make a statement. That’s where this Garmin watch lives and I’m okay with it. Fossil and Timex watches live here too. Using the Apple Watch as a standard, some of these fashion watches cost more, and some cost less, but they all say something an Apple Watch does not.
I’m bored with the Apple Watch, and right now I’m into thinking I live the type of life that needs a smartwatch that tracks every aspect of a triathlon. I don’t need all these features, but I like to think I do. I also don’t need to have a GMT watch with a third timezone, and I don’t need a watch with a hacking movement hand as if I need to synchronize my watch with other members of my special forces squad. But I have those watches along with dive watches and anti-magnetic watches. I’m not alone. The watch industry has long existed on selling lifestyles.
I was wrong before. The Apple Watch isn’t better than this Garmin or most other smartwatches— at least it’s not better for me right now. Maybe two weeks from now I’ll want to wear an Apple Watch and not because it’s better, but because it makes a different statement.
via TechCrunch
0 notes
Photo
The Racer Jumping Hour GMT is the first wristwatch presented by the Russian independent watchmaker Anton Suhanov! The model features a triple retrograde indication invented by Suhanov, with hours at 8, minutes at 4, and seconds on a 20-second scale at the center; there is also digital GMT indication at 12 and date at 6. Renowned for his spectacular desk clocks, @anton.suhanov was one of the 2016 winners of the young talent award promoted by F.P. Journe and AHCI. Having worked with Konstantin Chaykin for over ten years, he founded his own manufacture in 2019. It competes for the GPHG in the Men’s Complication category. 💰 18,600 Swiss Francs . O Racer Jumping Hour GMT foi o primeiro relógio de pulso apresentado pelo relojoeiro independente russo Anton Suhanov! O modelo traz uma tripla indicação retrógrada inventada por Suhanov, com horas, minutos e segundos em uma escala de 20 segundos no centro; há também indicação GMT digital às 12 e data às 6. Conhecido por seus espetaculares relógios dr mesa, Suhanov foi um dos vencedores, em 2016, do prêmio para jovens talentos promovido por F.P. Journe e a AHCI. Tendo trabalhado com Konstantin Chaykin por mais de dez anos, fundou sua própria manufatura em 2019. Ele compete no GPHG na categoria Complicação Masculina. 💰 18,600 Swiss Francs 📷 @anton.suhanov • • #antonsuhanov #gphg2022 #gphg #madeinrussia #independentwatchmaking #hautehorlogerie #racergmt #jumpinghour #ahci #finewatchmaking #hautehorlogerie #relogioserelogios https://www.instagram.com/p/ChK2JyLuaCP/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=
#antonsuhanov#gphg2022#gphg#madeinrussia#independentwatchmaking#hautehorlogerie#racergmt#jumpinghour#ahci#finewatchmaking#relogioserelogios
8 notes
·
View notes
Photo
Russian independent watchmaker Anton Suhanov presents Racer Jumping Hour GMT, his first wristwatch! The model features a triple retrograde indication invented by Suhanov, with hours at 8, minutes at 4, and seconds on a 20-second scale at the center; there is also digital GMT indication at 12 and date at 6. Renowned for his spectacular desk clocks, @anton.suhanov was one of the 2016 winners of the young talent award promoted by F.P. Journe and AHCI. Having worked with Konstantin Chaykin for over ten years, he founded his own manufacture in 2019. . O relojoeiro independente russo Anton Suhanov apresenta o Racer Jumping Hour GMT, seu primeiro relógio de pulso! O modelo traz uma tripla indicação retrógrada inventada por Suhanov, com horas, minutos e segundos em uma escala de 20 segundos no centro; há também indicação GMT digital às 12 e data às 6. Conhecido por seus espetaculares relógios dr mesa, Suhanov foi um dos vencedores, em 2016, do prêmio para jovens talentos promovido por F.P. Journe e a AHCI. Tendo trabalhado com Konstantin Chaykin por mais de dez anos, fundou sua própria manufatura em 2019. 📷 @anton.suhanov • • #antonsuhanov #madeinrussia #independentwatchmaking #hautehorlogerie #racergmt #jumpinghour #ahci #finewatchmaking #hautehorlogerie #relogioserelogios https://www.instagram.com/p/CQkFT47lpUD/?utm_medium=tumblr
#antonsuhanov#madeinrussia#independentwatchmaking#hautehorlogerie#racergmt#jumpinghour#ahci#finewatchmaking#relogioserelogios
10 notes
·
View notes
Photo
The Racer Jumping Hour GMT by the Russian independent watchmaker Anton Suhanov, his first wristwatch! The model features a triple retrograde indication invented by Suhanov, with hours at 8, minutes at 4, and seconds on a 20-second scale at the center; there is also digital GMT indication at 12 and date at 6. Renowned for his spectacular desk clocks, @anton.suhanov was one of the 2016 winners of the young talent award promoted by F.P. Journe and AHCI. Having worked with Konstantin Chaykin for over ten years, he founded his own manufacture in 2019. 💰 14,600 Euros . O Racer Jumping Hour GMT, do relojoeiro independente russo Anton Suhanov, seu primeiro relógio de pulso! O modelo traz uma tripla indicação retrógrada inventada por Suhanov, com horas, minutos e segundos em uma escala de 20 segundos no centro; há também indicação GMT digital às 12 e data às 6. Conhecido por seus espetaculares relógios dr mesa, Suhanov foi um dos vencedores, em 2016, do prêmio para jovens talentos promovido por F.P. Journe e a AHCI. Tendo trabalhado com Konstantin Chaykin por mais de dez anos, fundou sua própria manufatura em 2019. 💰 14.600 Euros 📷 @anton.suhanov • • #antonsuhanov #madeinrussia #independentwatchmaking #hautehorlogerie #racergmt #jumpinghour #ahci #finewatchmaking #hautehorlogerie #relogioserelogios https://www.instagram.com/p/CUVgDBvFaW1/?utm_medium=tumblr
#antonsuhanov#madeinrussia#independentwatchmaking#hautehorlogerie#racergmt#jumpinghour#ahci#finewatchmaking#relogioserelogios
4 notes
·
View notes
Photo
Racer Jumping Hour GMT by Anton Suhanov Technical specifications Limited edition of 20 pieces. Functions triple retrograde indication invented by Anton Suhanov with retrograde subdials for hours (at 8 o’clock), minutes (at 4 o’clock) and seconds on 20-seconds scale at the centre, jumping hour hand, 24 hours GMT jumping digital indication (at 12 o’clock) with synchronous switch of minutes, hours and GMT at the end of hour; date window at 6 o’clock. Movement calibre Su100.20, self-winding; diameter 31.5 mm, 6.9 mm thick (with indication module); the base caliber Eta 2824-2, modified by Anton Suhanov, decorative full-disc oscillating weight (rotor); frequency 28’800 semi-oscillations per hour; 38-hour power reserve. Indication module: invented, developed and made by Anton Suhanov; 172 parts. Jewels: 43 (base calibre – 25 jewels; indication module – 18 Jewels). Case stainless steel, 39 х 39 mm, thickness 12.5 mm; sapphire crystal; transparent sapphire caseback; 30 m water-resistant. Dial 27 parts; the base, appliques and the bows of retrograde subdials – brass with ruthenium coating, guilloche titanium retrograde subdials with blue anodization. Strap high-quality black leather strap with red contrast stitching; stainless steel buckle made by Anton Suhanov and designed as a sportscar spoiler. https://www.instagram.com/p/CQf6L7pLOzT/?utm_medium=tumblr
0 notes
Photo
For a unique design, should be created a unique movement, Anton Suhanov is convinced of this. He decided to build a calibre with the indications based on the function of the retrograde indication of minutes. He invented the complex design. At the beginning of a new hour, the minute hand jumps from the 60-minute to the zero position, and this rapid movement, almost imperceptible to the eye, performs two actions: it switches the retrograde hour hand forward one hour, and then the hand remains motionless for an hour. This is exactly how behaves the hour hand of “Marie Antoinette”. And at the same moment the 24-hour digital second timezone indicator of Racer Jumping Hour GMT, installed in the window at 12 o’clock position, goes one hour ahead. In the centre of the dial, there is an unusual second’s indicator on a dynamic 20-second arc-shaped scale – this is one of the consequences of the master’s principle of leisurely perception of time, therefore, the second’s indication is set on the dial centre, but does not dominate. If you take off the watch dial, it turns out that the seconds are indicated by a three-rayed second hand, similar to the one that was installed on the tourbillon axis of the foundation Black Clock. At the bottom of the dial, there is a date window, a must for a watch that claims to be of everyday use. https://www.instagram.com/p/CQf56lNrLgV/?utm_medium=tumblr
0 notes
Photo
Anton Suhanov, the Russian independent watchmaker and creator of the first in Russia triple-axis tourbillon table clock, presents his first wristwatch, the Racer Jumping Hour GMT. https://www.instagram.com/p/CQf5xOVr9Av/?utm_medium=tumblr
0 notes
Last Seen Blogs
saru42086
Aarogyamastu Telugu Videos
rubberboots-hamburg
My Blog
rysttle
Sketchy Chaos
ambipom
im em
naturelua-blog
aranmayanadam