Did a stained glass wolf during D&D (and then continued working on the stained glass wolf for like four hours after D&D it's 1:30 in the morning and I've made a mistake). I did a similar one with a lion years ago and completely forgot how I did it but I'm pretty happy with the effect.
182 notes
·
View notes
I know that how much Phoenix suspected Kristoph is very vague and I like the idea he had very little clue but honestly the thing that makes me think he did is Trucy. Because I think there is absolutely no way Kristoph didn't want her dead. He tried to kill vera, child murder isn't above him. And Trucy was a far far bigger weak chain in his scheme than she was but she escapes him basically unscathed other than minus one parent, who lets be real was canonically a POS who tried to kill a woman over a poker game. She saw him give her the diary page. She has psychic lie defecting abilities and he is constantly lying. She's absolutely the biggest direct threat to his scheme.
I feel like if Phoenix genuinely trusted Kristoph he would have absolutely had the opportunity to kill her and tie up that loose end. Trucy's savvy and able to protect herself but she's also a child. It is a miracle she's still alive by AA4 and I think that has to be because Phoenix was protecting her because he knew he couldn't trust Kristoph around her.
23 notes
·
View notes
Let's be honest, and I say this with full offense, Lucerys Velaryon is the Archduke Franz Ferdinand of the Dance of the Dragons. He is meant to be a sacrificial lamb to kick off the entire war proper. If we had gotten a full season of development with him like we did with the younger cast in Game of Thrones, I guarantee more people would've felt something. The only reason I personally feel bad is from a baseline level of empathy, because he was a child who was placed in an unwinnable situation due to his mom being completely irresponsible with him and his brothers.
However…
The comparison between Lucerys and Aemond is no contest. Love him or hate him, Aemond has an actual personality and goals when we first meet him. There's enough dimension in Aemond as a child to showcase the potential for sympathy between him and Jace at the funeral, a scene they didn't need to put in, but they did, which emphasizes his own innocence. Even before he breaks bad fully in S1E10, he's still far more compelling to watch due to the number of scenes allocated to him and his dynamic with other people.
This is where you and I are going to disagree just a bit, because Lucerys does do something in S1E07 and S1E08. He gouges out the eye of a family member and petulantly whines that he “didn’t do anything!” when confronted with the possibility of getting in trouble for it, then years later has the nerve and complete lack of sense to giggle at the person he permanently maimed only hours after his legitimacy was publicly called into question (again) and resulted in a murder. The narrative (perhaps unintentionally) glosses over these moments in favor of portraying him as good, whereas if you read between the lines, you can see that as being an oversimplification. The problem is that because S1 was truncated, secondary characters like Lucerys don’t receive screentime dedicated to portraying anything other than a single personality trait. Unfortunately, because of his role in the text and the way it was adapted for television, there was never a chance that Lucerys would be interesting.
I don't even have anything to add, this is just objectively correct.
8 notes
·
View notes
byan pointing at the menace of a cat that lives in their apartment who shreds all their belongings, who launches out at them from under furniture to claw at their feet, who seems to intentionally step in front of them so they trip over her, who hogs all their boyfriend's attention, who seems to exist just to spite them even though they were the one who rescued her, and calling her an unhinged and feral beast while failing to realize that this is basically what it was like for people who allowed them into their homes is endlessly funny to me
4 notes
·
View notes
Universe where Link must defeat a threat, and is accompanied by the spirits of Zelda and Ganondorf (who are dead and or out of commission) as his shoulder angel and devil respectively. Hilarity ensues.
What do you mean this isn't already the game??
7 notes
·
View notes
im thinking abt these scenes again and i really dont get it... its obvious ketil's not supposed to be liked at this point, and even less so later, but just seeing him here makes me remember snake just before. a disgusting looking ketil rolls out of a barrel as a gag, he pathetically stumbles out, almost looking drunk, while no one seems to positively regard him, and he is asking for his slave woman that could be his daughter's age who just had her husband murdered. you're very much not supposed to like him at all compared to his kind master introduction, but i look at snake and he just so plainly is not depicted in the same way. snake looks fired up, like he has an undeniable point, saying something you'd agree with out of context, and this doesn't look like a scene where a villain is spouting brainwashed, hypocritical, or biased logic, esp w the reaction of who he's speaking to
snake is fighting for his right to punish an escaped slave, and every person around him is resisting bc gardar's crime was escaping and resisting arrest to be enslaved again and further punished. thorfinn physically fights after agonizing abt violence, arnheid pleads, and sverkel attempts to bargain for this man, so they clearly all disagree with what snake's doing, but they are quiet as if he has a point, when they shouldn't be when they have the context for the situation and therefore are all trying so hard. they don't look like they're quiet in submission, they werent born slaves or currently internalize the thought that they're property, that snake is right and theyre wrong, esp w thorfinn's wish to eliminate slavery and war. snake's depiction in this arc is just very strange because you cant say gardar's life is worth more than any other man, or however many he kills, but the story acts as if the people killed didnt all fight to dehumanize this man that just wanted to leave, you dont see gardar making this declaration. its just very strange ketil's clearly depicted in a poor light, but snake misses all of that same tone, is even shown to have a point, and then also im pretty sure is shown as heroic in the next part as if everything he did before didn't happen??
before, i get askeladd being a very likable character (and i disagree w that approach considering how easy it is to forget he is a piece of shit, ive seen ppl think his whole life hes been scheming to get a Good man on the throne) because the prologue basically centers around just the vikings, who arent the most moral, but snake here seems to be as self aware as askeladd, but without any guilt, and is shown like he has a point..? its just very weird to me... how are we saying slavery Bad, but apparently snake has a point when he is... fighting to keep a man enslaved..? its not even like its the only job in the world or he's being forced to or something, theres no reason for him to be fighting so hard to be a cop
2 notes
·
View notes
@slaygue, continued.
water carves a path according to the ground it flows through. xingqiu is young yet, bearing witness only to the completed state of each river, the stable product of erosion beneath each waterfall. he knows of currents only in the way he is warned away from them, lest they rush him away.
he gets the feeling that the warning was not a luxury afforded to childe. the harbinger looks like one who has learned to survive the currents on penalty of death.
xingqiu grew up on books, born into a family of traders. it didn’t take a vision to make him a strategist, to respond to any situation with an innate flexibility and the analytical skills to match. so he listens to childe speak, and hears, won’t you join me? (he wonders what it must have taken to survive, and does not envy childe for it.)
water carves a path, and xingqiu adjusts his course.
(so in war, avoid what is strong—)
“underhanded tactics are reserved for times of war, not for sparring,” xingqiu replies, dismissing his rain swords. “there is no honor in achieving victory in a spar through unfair methods. if that is what you hope to impart on me, then i must refuse this battle.”
1 note
·
View note
It really, REALLY, should not be default to censor words.
I'm sorry but the only reason I or anyone ever had to "make a choice" to say Fuck, is because you're immature, have never experienced true life changing hardship, you refused to grow the fuck up and get over yourself and the childish petty standards you made under the guise of a personality.
YOU
made it a problem.
I was just speaking with intent to discuss.
You made it a personality to remain a child. To be the most important in the room even when someone else has the talking stick. Grow up.
2 notes
·
View notes