Tumgik
#Credit Counseling Columbia
nab-solutions · 1 month
Text
Credit Repair British Columbia | NAB Solutions
Tumblr media
NAB Solutions offers credit repair British Columbia. Our dedicated team offers personalized solutions to improve credit scores and financial health. Contact us at 855-542-6078 to embark on your journey towards a brighter financial future. Whether you're facing credit challenges or seeking to enhance your financial standing, we are ready to provide expert guidance and support every step of the way. Trust us to help you achieve your credit repair goals and regain control of your financial well-being in British Columbia.
0 notes
Text
Breaking Free from Debt: Strategic Solutions in British Columbia's Consolidation Services
In British Columbia, the journey towards financial freedom begins with debt consolidation services. These services offer strategic solutions to individuals burdened by multiple debts, providing a pathway to break free from the cycle of debt.
With credit counselling BC as a guiding light, individuals can access expert advice and support to navigate their financial challenges. Together, these services empower individuals to take control of their finances, develop effective debt management strategies, and ultimately achieve freedom from debt.
Through a combination of debt consolidation services and credit counselling BC, individuals in British Columbia can break free from the shackles of debt and embark on a journey towards financial stability and independence. It's not just about consolidating debts; it's about reclaiming control over one's financial future.
Surrey, BC
Unit 456, 2153 Central City, 10153 King George Blvd. Surrey, BC, Canada V3T 2W1 Telephone: (778) 800-9957 Email: [email protected]
0 notes
Text
When Elizabeth Dasburg tried to use cash to pay the entry fee to the Fort Pulaski National Monument in Georgia, she was told that the site, part of the U.S. National Park Service, could accept cards only, no cash.
An employee suggested she go to the local grocery store or “big chains like Walmart” to purchase a gift card. “Since those are cards, we can accept them in leu [sic] of cash,” the site employee wrote.
Dasburg and two others who also were denied entrance to a national park unless they used a card to pay the entrance fee on Wednesday sued the National Park Service, challenging its cashless fee collection policy.
In a complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, the plaintiffs allege the federal agency is violating U.S. law by refusing to accept U.S. currency as entry payment.
Children’s Health Defense (CHD) is financially supporting the lawsuit.
“CHD is excited to support attorney Ray Flores and the plaintiffs in this case to push back against the move toward a cashless society and central bank digital currency,” said Kim Mack Rosenberg, CHD general counsel.
“By forcing people to use credit cards or digital wallets, under the guise of convenience, the National Park Service becomes a player in the surveillance state, undermining park visitors’ privacy right,” Rosenberg said.
Flores told The Defender he found it “appalling” that “these pristine lands are the nation’s testing ground” for a cashless society.
658 notes · View notes
Text
""Moreover, it turns out that the United States is not all that tightfisted when it comes to social spending. “If you count all public benefits offered by the federal government, America’s welfare state (as a share of its gross domestic product) is the second biggest in the world, after France’s,” Desmond tells us. Why doesn’t this largesse accomplish more?
For one thing, it unduly assists the affluent. That statistic about the U.S. spending almost as much as France on social welfare, he explains, is accurate only “if you include things like government-subsidized retirement benefits provided by employers, student loans and 529 college savings plans, child tax credits, and homeowner subsidies: benefits disproportionately flowing to Americans well above the poverty line.” To enjoy most of these, you need to have a well-paying job, a home that you own, and probably an accountant (and, if you’re really in clover, a money manager).
“The American government gives the most help to those who need it least,” Desmond argues. “This is the true nature of our welfare state, and it has far-reaching implications, not only for our bank accounts and poverty levels, but also for our psychology and civic spirit.” Americans who benefit from social spending in the form of, say, a mortgage-interest tax deduction don’t see themselves as recipients of governmental generosity. The boon it offers them may be as hard for them to recognize and acknowledge as the persistence of poverty once was to Harrington’s suburban housewives and professional men. These Americans may be anti-government and vote that way. They may picture other people, poor people, as weak and dependent and themselves as hardworking and upstanding. Desmond allows that one reason for this is that tax breaks don’t feel the same as direct payments. Although they may amount to the same thing for household incomes and for the federal budget—“You can benefit a family by lowering its tax burden or by increasing its benefits, same difference”—they are associated with an obligation and a procedure that Americans, in particular, find onerous. Tax-cutting Republican lawmakers want the process to be both difficult and Swiss-cheesed with loopholes. (“Taxes should hurt,” Ronald Reagan once said.) But that’s not the only reason. What Desmond calls the “rudest explanation” is that if, for whatever reason, we get a tax break, most of us like it. That’s the case for people affluent and lucky enough to take advantage of the legitimate breaks designed for their benefit, and for the wily super-rich who game the system with expensive lawyering and ingenious use of tax shelters.
And there are other ways, Desmond points out, that government help gets thwarted or misdirected. When President Clinton instituted welfare reform, in 1996, pledging to “transform a broken system that traps too many people in a cycle of dependence,” an older model, Aid to Families with Dependent Children, or A.F.D.C., was replaced by Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, or TANF. Where most funds administered by A.F.D.C. went straight to families in the form of cash aid, TANF gave grants to states with the added directive to promote two-parent families and discourage out-of-wedlock childbirth, and let the states fund programs to achieve those goals as they saw fit. As a result, “states have come up with rather creative ways to spend TANF dollars,” Desmond writes. “Nationwide, for every dollar budgeted for TANF in 2020, poor families directly received just 22 cents. Only Kentucky and the District of Columbia spent over half of their TANF funds on basic cash assistance.” Between 1999 and 2016, Oklahoma directed more than seventy million dollars toward initiatives to promote marriage, offering couples counselling and workshops that were mostly open to people of all income levels. Arizona used some of the funds to pay for abstinence education; Pennsylvania gave some of its TANF money to anti-abortion programs. Mississippi treated its TANF funds as an unexpected Christmas present, hiring a Christian-rock singer to perform at concerts, for instance, and a former professional wrestler—the author of an autobiography titled “Every Man Has His Price”—to deliver inspirational speeches. (Much of this was revealed by assiduous investigative reporters, and by a 2020 audit of Mississippi’s Department of Human Services.) Moreover, because states don’t have to spend all their TANF funds each year, many carry over big sums. In 2020, Tennessee, which has one of the highest child-poverty rates in the nation, left seven hundred and ninety million dollars in TANF funds unspent."
- The New Yorker: "How America Manufactures Poverty" by Margaret Talbot (review of Matthew Desmond's Poverty by America).
195 notes · View notes
faithnfrivolity · 3 months
Text
Trump’s Lawyer Walked Into a Trap
By the end of the argument, everyone knew it.
By George T. Conway III
January 10, 2024, 5 AM ET
A photo-illustration featuring a photo of Donald Trump and photo of his supporters against a black background
Amanda Andrade-Rhoades / Bloomberg / Getty; Kent Nishimura / Getty
It was a cold and rainy morning in Washington, D.C., yesterday. Five years ago, Donald Trump said that was enough to deter him from visiting Aisne-Marne American Cemetery, to commemorate the fallen American soldiers—soldiers who died defending the nation whose Constitution he had sought to abrogate but now seeks to invoke. But yesterday, he showed up anyway. Appearing in court was more important to him, because this was about him.
And so at 9:25 a.m., the former president and his entourage strode into Courtroom 31 of the E. Barrett Prettyman United States Courthouse on Constitution Avenue, just a few blocks away from the Capitol his supporters had ransacked three years ago Friday, and took their seats. It took just a few short minutes for their case to come completely apart.
The wood-paneled walls of the courtroom display large official portraits of many of the renowned judges who have served on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, known colloquially as the D.C. Circuit and long considered to be the second-most important appellate court in the land. The faces gazing down from the walls were mostly male, with a couple of exceptions. Near the front on the left side, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, wearing a trademark jabot, had one of the better views, directly overlooking the bench, counsel table, and podium. I envied her vantage point; from her perch, I could have seen the expressions of all the players, including the defendant. I found it hard not to wonder what she would have thought of these proceedings.
Delta Community Credit Union
No doubt she would have approved of the panel of judges who heard the case: three women, of differing backgrounds and of fine reputations, each sworn to “administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and the rich.” The question these jurists faced in the appeal they heard yesterday—styled United States of America v. Donald J. Trump, No. 23–3228—came down to whether justice could be administered to a former president of the United States.
Everyone rose, including Trump, as the women in black robes entered the courtroom. The court quickly got to work. D. John Sauer, a former solicitor general of Missouri (appointed by then–state Attorney General Josh Hawley), an advocate with an exceptionally gravelly voice that runs as fast as any New Yorker’s, stepped to the podium to speak for Trump.
From the October 2023 issue: The courtroom is a very unhappy place for Donald Trump
Before he could say anything, the presiding judge, Karen LeCraft Henderson, a George H. W. Bush appointee who nearly a quarter century ago had taken Ken Starr’s seat on the court, immediately asked Sauer whether the court had jurisdiction to hear the appeal. This wasn’t an issue the parties raised—it surfaced in a friend-of-the-court brief—but the judges understandably wanted to hear what the parties had to say about it.
In a nutshell, the jurisdictional question arose from the fact that the federal courts strongly disfavor “interlocutory” appeals—challenges to district-court rulings before the district court finally decides the whole case. That disfavor can be overcome, on occasion, for appeals of so-called collateral orders: orders deciding issues that are sufficiently divorced from the ultimate merits of the case and that might be effectively unreviewable in a later appeal after a final judgment. In a case called Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States, the Supreme Court made clear that the collateral-order exception must be narrowly construed, particularly in criminal cases. No court has ever addressed how Midland Asphalt applies to a criminal prosecution of a former president for acts he committed in office.
Sauer, as expected, argued that the exception does apply, and that the court could hear the appeal. I say expected because it could be no other way for his client: If this appeal were dismissed, Trump would not be able to pursue his claim of immunity from prosecution until after he is (as I admittedly hope he will be) convicted and sentenced.
The panel member seemingly most interested in the jurisdictional question was Judge J. Michelle Childs, a Biden appointee who, before joining the D.C. Circuit, had served for 12 years as a federal district judge in South Carolina. Midland Asphalt states that defendants can’t make interlocutory criminal appeals raising issues of immunity from prosecution unless there’s “an explicit statutory or constitutional guarantee that trial will not occur.” Childs’s questions focused on the fact that, whether or not Trump has immunity, the guarantee that he’s relying on isn’t “explicit”—he argues that it’s inherent in the separation of powers. Sauer didn’t have much of a response to this line of inquiry, other than to say, in effect, that presidential immunity claims are special, and that explicit didn’t really mean “explicit.” He did get a little help, though, from Judge Henderson, who made the suggestion that Midland Asphalt was itself only a suggestion from the Supreme Court.
But the jurisdictional back-and-forth was merely a sideshow; what everyone came to hear was the merits of Trump’s immunity argument, and the court’s reaction to it. Sauer and the judges soon obliged. Sauer warned, in effect, that the heavens would fall—ruat caelum, for fanciers of Latin legal axioms—were his client tried for his crimes. “To authorize the prosecution of a president for his official acts would open a Pandora’s box from which this nation may never recover.” He elaborated: “Could George W. Bush be prosecuted for obstruction of an official proceeding for allegedly giving false information to Congress to induce the nation to go to war in Iraq under false pretenses? Could President Obama be potentially charged with murder for allegedly authorizing drone strikes targeting U.S. citizens located abroad?”
Sauer never got the chance to answer his own rhetorical questions, because at this point, the panel’s most incisive and persistent questioner jumped in. “Can I explore the implications of what you are arguing?” inquired Judge Florence Y. Pan, a Biden appointee and longtime federal prosecutor in the nation’s capital who also served on the Superior Court as well as the United States District Court there. “I understand your position to be that a president is immune from criminal prosecution for any official act, even if that action is taken for an unlawful or unconstitutional purpose. Is that correct?”
Sauer’s answer: Yes, but with an exception. The exception being that, if a president is impeached by the House of Representatives and convicted by the Senate, then and only then can he be prosecuted in a criminal court, after he leaves office, for the offenses for which the Senate had convicted him.
This was not a great answer. As I wrote a couple of days ago about Trump’s Supreme Court certiorari petition in his Colorado ballot-disqualification case, appellate courts usually don’t find convincing a litigant’s efforts to combine two weak points in order to make a stronger one. Usually, the weakness in one bad argument bleeds into the other, and vice versa—producing a sum that is even less than its parts. And that’s what happened here.
As Judge Pan’s question pointed out, Trump’s main argument on this appeal is that presidents can’t be prosecuted for their official acts. That argument is based on a line of civil cases establishing that presidents can’t be held liable via monetary damages for their official actions—more specifically, as the Supreme Court held in 1981 in Nixon v. Fitzgerald, there is “absolute Presidential immunity from damages liability for acts within the ‘outer perimeter’ of his official responsibility.”
I know a fair bit about this line of precedent, because (in what seems now to be another life), I ghostwrote the Supreme Court brief for Paula Jones that defeated President Bill Clinton’s claim of immunity, 9–0, in Clinton v. Jones in 1997. Suffice it to say that the rationale behind Fitzgerald encompasses only civil liability because it is grounded in the fear that, if presidents could be hauled into civil court by the countless people affected by their official acts, then the leader of the free world might fear doing his or her job. And even if this protection from civil-damages liability could be extended into the criminal realm, it surely oughtn’t apply here, where Trump was not only acting beyond the “outer perimeter” of his official responsibility, but utterly abjuring that official responsibility.
Still, Trump’s immunity argument is at least an argument: Not a good one, not a winner, but not completely and totally ridiculous. I can’t say it wasn’t worth the old college try. The same cannot be said about the other major contention Trump has urged on this appeal, the argument that Sauer took to conflating with the immunity argument in response to Judge Pan’s questioning.
That second argument relies on what’s called the Constitution’s impeachment-judgment clause, in Article I, Section 3. That provision, in its entirety, says (with the relevant part italicized):
Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.
By its express terms, all this language does is make sure everyone understands that double-jeopardy protections don’t apply when a federal public official is impeached, convicted, and removed from office. The clause makes clear that the official may still go to jail—that he remains “subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment” even after he is removed from his job.
But Trump’s lawyers contend that this text says something it absolutely does not say: that, if a public official, namely the president, is not impeached and removed by Congress, then he cannot be prosecuted under criminal law. This is fallacious reasoning by “negative inference,” as Judge Childs dismissively put it, and it’s absurd for any number of reasons even apart from the plain meaning of the English language the clause uses. For one thing, a wealth of historical evidence contradicts the argument. As Justice Joseph Story explained in his Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, even after an acquittal at an impeachment trial, the accused should still be liable to face a criminal trial, for “if no such second trial could be had, then the grossest official offenders might escape without any substantial punishment, even for crimes.”
David A. Graham: The cases against Trump: a guide
For another, a public official might be acquitted in the Senate for reasons other than the merits of the impeachment charges against him. In fact, that’s exactly what happened at Trump’s second impeachment trial. As Special Counsel Jack Smith noted in his D.C. Circuit brief, “At least 31 of the 43 Senators who voted to acquit the defendant”—Trump—“explained that their decision to do so rested in whole or in part on their agreement with the defendant’s argument that the Senate lacked jurisdiction to try him because he was no longer in office.” Worse yet, as Henderson and Pan later pointed out during the argument, Trump’s own lawyers conceded to the Senate in February 2021 that, even if Trump were not convicted on the impeachment charges, he could still be criminally charged. Oops.
I could go on about the impeachment-judgment clause, and the members of the panel certainly did, but the bottom line is that Trump’s argument about that clause was frivolous, and not worth making. In fact, Sauer, by extending that argument to make a limited concession to Pan’s questioning about whether he was arguing that presidents could never be criminally prosecuted—remember, he said that this could happen if the president is first convicted by the Senate—unwittingly set a nasty trap for himself.
A trap that Pan’s brilliant interrogation shut tight.
The judge wasted no time in drilling into the implications and inconsistencies in Sauer’s position. Pan asked, incredulously, “Could a president order SEAL Team Six to assassinate a political rival? That’s an official act—an order to SEAL Team Six.”
To which Sauer replied, unresponsively, that a president would quickly be impeached and removed for that. This was followed by more unresponsive words from Sauer.
Pan wanted an answer—to the question she had asked.
Pan: I asked you a yes-or-no question. Could a president who ordered SEAL Team Six to assassinate a political rival [and] who was not impeached, would he be subject to criminal prosecution?
Sauer: If he were impeached and convicted first—
Pan: So your answer is no?
Sauer: My answer is a qualified yes.
The filibustering then continued, with Sauer rambling on about Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel memorandums, James Madison, the abuse of the criminal process. Many words.
Pan interrupted again: “I asked you a series of hypotheticals about criminal actions that could be taken by a president and could be considered official acts and have asked you: Would such a president be subject to criminal prosecution if he’s not impeached and convicted? And your answer, your yes-or-no answer, is no?”
Sauer, realizing he was being cornered somehow, tried to avoid the door closing behind him. But Pan was having none of it. Like the experienced prosecutor she is, she insisted on an answer, and wasn’t going to let go. (If this judging thing doesn’t work out for her, I’d love to see her host Meet the Press someday.)
She and Sauer went around and around on this a few more times. But the damage was done, and Pan’s point was devastatingly made—in essence, that Sauer was arguing out of both sides of his mouth. On the one hand, Sauer argued that the Constitution gave the president absolute immunity for his official acts, lest we have political prosecutions of former presidents. On the other hand, if the United States Congress—a political body if ever there was one—effectively gives permission (by impeaching and convicting), well, then, yes, a president can be prosecuted, and—wait for it—he’s not absolutely immune.
It’s hard to know whether the criminal defendant, sitting at the counsel table, could understand enough of the dialogue to know that his immunity argument had completely collapsed, right then and there. But it had.
Sometimes during appellate arguments, there’s a moment when you know exactly how the court will come out. And this was one. I once had such a moment, fortunately in my favor. My one and only argument before the U.S. Supreme Court was in a case about whether federal securities laws could impose liability for securities transactions occurring abroad. I was arguing in the negative, on behalf of an Australian bank. My opponent was up first, arguing in favor of applying American law. I figured I had the conservative justices, but I was a bit less sure about the more liberal justices.
After some preliminary questions to my adversary about jurisdiction, the Court got to the merits. I’ll never forget it. Justice Ginsburg asked a question that was more like a statement: “This case is Australian plaintiff, Australian defendant, shares purchased in Australia. It has ‘Australia’ written all over it.” I don’t know whether I heard the rest of her question, or my opponent’s answer. But I knew right then and there, before having uttered a word to the Court, that my client had won.
As for the special counsel on Tuesday morning, he, too—like everyone else in the courtroom—knew from Judge Pan’s withering questioning and Sauer’s evasive responses to her that Trump is going to lose. The only question is how quickly it will happen. I have little doubt it will be soon.
0 notes
kingkone · 4 months
Text
Navigating Your Financial Journey: Personal Financial Counselling in British Columbia
When it comes to managing your finances, British Columbia offers a diverse range of opportunities and challenges. From the bustling urban centres of Vancouver to the serene landscapes of the Okanagan Valley, the province boasts a unique economic landscape. Whether you're a young professional looking to get a handle on your budget or a retiree planning for a secure future, personal financial counselling in British Columbia can provide you with the guidance you need to make informed decisions and achieve your financial goals.
Why Personal Financial Counselling Matters
Tailored Guidance for Your Goals: Personal financial counsellors understand that everyone's financial situation is unique. They work closely with you to identify your financial goals, whether it's buying a home, saving for education, or preparing for retirement. This personalized approach ensures that your financial plan aligns with your aspirations.
Navigating B.C.'s Cost of Living: British Columbia is known for its stunning scenery, but it also comes with a relatively high cost of living, particularly in urban areas. A financial counsellor can help you create a budget that accounts for the region's expenses, allowing you to enjoy your life while managing your finances responsibly.
Investment Opportunities and Risks: B.C. offers various investment opportunities, from real estate to technology startups. However, navigating these can be complex. A personal financial counsellor can provide insights into the best investment strategies for your risk tolerance and financial situation.
Tax Efficiency: The tax landscape in British Columbia is unique, with provincial and federal taxes to consider. Financial counsellors can help you optimize your tax strategy, ensuring you take full advantage of available credits and deductions.
Debt Management: Many British Columbians face student loans, mortgages, and other forms of debt. A financial counsellor can help you create a plan to manage and reduce your debt while maintaining a healthy financial future.
Tumblr media
The Role of Personal Financial Counsellors
Personal financial counsellors in British Columbia are trained professionals who provide valuable expertise in various financial areas.
Budgeting: They help you create a realistic budget that considers your income, expenses, and financial goals.
Investment Planning: They offer guidance on building and managing your investment portfolio, including strategies to diversify and minimize risk.
Retirement Planning: Counsellors can help you plan for a comfortable retirement, taking into account factors like the Canada Pension Plan and private retirement savings.
Estate Planning: If you have assets in B.C., it's essential to plan for their distribution. Financial counsellors can assist with estate planning BC to ensure your wishes are carried out.
Choosing the Right Personal Financial Counsellor in British Columbia
Credentials: Look for counsellors with recognized certifications such as Certified Financial Planner (CFP) or Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA).
Experience: Seek counsellors with experience in your specific financial situation or goals, whether that's retirement planning or investment management.
Compatibility: Building a strong working relationship with your counsellor is crucial. Find someone you feel comfortable discussing your financial matters with.
Transparency: Ensure the counsellor is transparent about their fees and how they are compensated, whether through fees, commissions, or a combination of both.
Navigating your fee only financial planner BC can be an exciting and rewarding experience with the right guidance. Personal financial counselling offers valuable support tailored to your unique financial situation and goals. Whether you're aiming to estate planning BC, retirement planning BC, portfolio review BC, or simply manage your finances better, a personal financial counsellor can be your trusted partner on the path to financial success in beautiful British Columbia.
Lorna Eastman Financial provides personal financial counselling in British Columbia. Their process is designed to assist clients in clarifying and understanding their current financial status. Homework required prior to the initial meeting helps clients clarify the current picture and focus on their plans.
0 notes
thoughtsoffeliz · 11 months
Text
Harvey W. Rogers
Partner
Practice Group(s):Public and Tax Credit Finance
222 SW Columbia Street,Suite 1400
Portland, Oregon 97201-6632
Tel:503-226-5721
Fax:503-553-6221
Harvey W. Rogers is a partner in the Portland office of Preston Gates & Ellis LLP,where he has devoted 90 percent of his practice to municipal finance for the last twenty-five years. He has extensive experience in unusual and innovative financings. His recent activities include selling bonds on the internet working with public officials and the Oregen Legislative assembly to implement "Measure 50" Oregon's most recent property tax limitation,lottery revenue bonds and other unusual revenue backed issues; advance refundings,lease and certificate of participation financings, and taxable municipal bonds.
Harvey is primary bond counsel for many Oregon cities, including Portland,Eugene,Hillsboro,Grants Pass,Tigard and Tualatin, and to the Portland Metropolitan Service District and the Oregon Department of Administrative Services, the Oregon University System, the Oregon Department of Energy and the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. Harvey is lead counsel to Clackamas, Washington and Lane Counties and most borrowing Oregon people's utility districts and provides bond counsel services to the Port of Portland and a wide variety of other cities, countiesand special district in the state of Oregon
Harvey is a frequent speaker at municipal finance functions and serves on the Marion County Council of Economic Advisors and as the chair of the Oregon Short Term Fund Board. He lives in Portland, Oregon, is interested in bluegrass music and is trying to learn to play the Dobro.
EDUCATION & CREDENTIALS
Bar Admissions: Oregon, Commonwealth of Massachusetts
J.D., University of Oregon School of Law,1975
M.S.,(psychology), University of Oregon,1972
B.A.,summa cum laude, California State College at Hayward,1969
0 notes
manleycollins · 1 year
Text
Journal Entry #68 - One Tough Cookie...Never Break Character, Flawless Integrity since the Year I was Born
JOURNAL ENTRY #68 Name: Manley M Collins Social Security Number: 5 7 9 – * * – 6 5 4 1 Date of Birth: 06/21 Place of Birth: Washington, District of Columbia Country of Birth: United States of America Date: August 2, 2021
TOPIC: One Tough Cookie…Never Break Character, Flawless Integrity since the Year I was Born
Remembering the quote from my biological father, Mr. Manley Rochelle Nolen, "It does not matter where you are in the world." and my 2021 thought rebuttal, "You made a difference already the day you were born, life wants to see you do it."
I tried to get my money back regarding Lyft's CitiBike, but only was able to get a partial refund. I learn the new rules regarding credit and debit cards are put in place regarding 90 days or less to get refund and the responsibility is to work with the merchant first and second tries, then the bank or credit card company for the third try. There are most likely no refunds after sixty (60) days.
It was tax time again to file my Internal Revenue Service (IRS). I always file it paper because it does something to and overrides the another party that files as well.
I explored WeWork office location at 200 Berkeley St. I got the full tour plus they do mail and printing, too. They lacked storage lockers for the lower memberships. They did offer plenty for office space and open workspace. I explored based on the reason of potentially having another office job or desk job. I was ready, but the job offers never panned out.
I researched and purchased Warner Bros. Mortal Kombat 11 for my PC and smartphones, and watched the movie.
I saw a new book and skimmed through named, "The Power of Habit." Charles Duhigg (he went to Yale and Harvard). I never purchased the book because if you read through my blogs and see how I tried to be apart of them, the ivy leagues did not let me in so I began disconnecting and stop supporting or throwing my money at the ivy leagues ecosystem. I cannot stop all of it, but the ones I can read or see the credentials.
Boston Housing Authority Zero Income Statement validity.
I met with Crunch Fitness Regional GX Manager to possibly teaching there and the new locations. The Regional GX Manager gave the encouragement to get NASM AFAA Group Fitness Instructor certification. I renewed my membership with Planet Fitness, but added Crunch Fitness because of the ability to bodybuild or powerlift with higher weights and group fitness classes. The Regional GX Manager stated Crunch did not accept IFTA certificates.
I took advantage of the Planet Fitness's Rockbot. The staff and I had fun liking and disliking each other's song played. I went through almost the entire catalog of songs, especially holiday themed stuff and Sunday/Saturday had the gospel. Every Massachusetts Planet Fitness knew I was in the building when I came in with Kelis 'Milkshake', Megan Thee Stallion 'Body', Justin Bieber 'Yummy', Drake 'Sticky', Shakira 'Waka Waka', or Martin Solveig '+1', 'Do It Right' and 'Places'
When Walmart is unavailable, of course, I go to the local Target in Boston or Cambridge. CVS Pharmacy always get me with the coupons in email and on the app.
I had to temporarily serve as a process server for Defendants in lawsuits. Cook County Sheriff's office plus ProofServe helped served the Chicago area of Defendants. I did like the electronic automation system. ProofServe also helped served the Boston area of Defendants. ProofServe was darn sure cheaper than ABC Legal, which tried have you make a mortgage or car payment to have someone served, thus maxing out my DiscoverCard.
I had a dental appointment with Trinity Dental, but from the dental exam I could not get my teeth cleaning because of long-term infections, but had really good tooth pulled (extracted) for one infection and still not teeth cleaned. I was referred to a specialist for dental work I did not want to examine how get the other long-term infection (root canal).
Therapy and Psychiatrist with Arbour Counseling Services topics were (Previous Journal topics - I just was repeating them to new people verbally)
Something changed Sunday, July 26, 2021 - relaxed and released feeling Energy up Remembered South Carolina dietary needs
Email communications Fitness up - meaning running for 1.5 hours and upping speeds
Negative energy all week Relationship closure Calculating years since last relationship Money New York and Illinois Barnes and Noble Boston - Fiction largest section Spoke with a long time recruiter - Teksystems Email clean out and Defense Department attempting to recruit for a return Realizing with Crunch fitness scale confirming with clinic that I am overweight
Boston Copley Square library computers go down or offline. Almost done with 2019. Recruiters calling for opportunities Good week Discovered what glucose numbers look like without fasting Walmart errand and got so much more stuff Walking 11-20 miles per day Laundromat closed
Adjustment to new Caplyta medication - dizziness, nausea, little panic attack, body temperature/libido rose, then sedation. Still able to function. Mellow emotions
Discovered the inactive online policy drives -freeze files and delete the storage after two years of inactivity. Same policy for email.
All this schizophrenic activity makes me upset and angry.
AT&T, Verizon, Google, and Flickr are some companies at a reasonable price makes sense for appropriate storage and use.
The Power of Habit - Charles Duhigg (went to Yale and Harvard) - is a turn off.
Victim, Supporter, Helper, Doer position is becoming annoying.
Loss of shift/job role from Federal Express for business reasons and because of extended leave.
Sexual life - parents have children, then start messing around, then get HIV/AIDS as a penalty…not a scientific statement, but based on meeting parents with children who have divorced or separated.
MGH Psychiatrist starts suggesting trying for third time in obtaining Social Security.
Chicago lawsuit Thinking of ways to give the money back from the source it comes from American Psychological Association webinar Artificial Intelligence - Siri and Google Assistant Federal Express Harvard Business Review Fighting for me - DOD and Federal Express Promising future in the gym and sports world - I have never thought being a sports agent. Cities and States Laws, Rules, and Reality Experienced and educated out the technology world. Recruiters only fought to put in position and never gave feedback at the time of release for self-improvement.
New recruitment websites for freelancers or post-pandemic world Cussing or using foul language more Commencement no cheers - happy feeling
Reading Fortune magazine Walgreens Boots Alliance CEO black woman Rosalind Brewer To be a Fortune 500 CEO, you have to know someone or come up through the ranks.
Reading Bloomberg Businessweek October 11, 2021 issue secret Disney article to the rear of the magazine made me laugh hysterically on Sunday
MGH Psychiatrist Thoughts: Do I have any thoughts on running for Mayor or President of the United States?
Obama, Kamala, and African-American/minority leaders are paving the way and making it more realistic. I know I have the skills and talent to do the position, but to make it real for me - for Mayor, I need one (1) million solid supports and voters or 70% of the entire voting rolls, plus 1 million dollars to run so that is $1.00 per person. For Governor, I need 70% of the entire voting rolls and $10.00 per voter. For President, I need solid 100 million voters to assure the win and $100 million dollars to start fundraising, which is $1.00 per person. This would make it realistic for me in The United States of America. I need my education debt paid for because I cannot or plan to go to Harvard University in getting more debt.
Otherwise, my realistic plans is my reality to do France and rise through the ranks to the Elyees Palace with family and all. I am not dumb, but only try once. France is my current focus. I can let go my rage and anger against America or the emotions created from life experiences.
After seeing candidates go into debt for position, I will never do.
Other Topics from Summer and Fall of 2021:
With the current set of lawsuits, I started requesting audits of the cases.
My University of Phoenix commencement card came in the United States Postal Service mail. When I got to Atlanta and saw the jumbotron, the card indicates how to introduce me on stage. It was impressive. I went to the Sanctuary nightclub at 3209 Paces Ferry Place NW, Atlanta, GA. I did not make it to MJQ Concourse club. I went to Atlanta Public Library and use their computers. I had a new Atlanta hairstylist who did my hair. My commencement was livestream via YouTube…so impressive. Check my photoblogs for the actual pictures. I did celebrate with my Rho Kappa Lambda Chapter of Alpha Phi Alpha fraternity brothers during commencement weekend.
MGH Psychiatrist starts suggesting trying for third time in obtaining Social Security.
New blogging sites, such as Reddit, Medium, and Mastodon, but they did not like repeat or already published information. They are expecting blogs or writing with a twist, creative writing, or alternative truth.
I earned Busuu McGraw Hill French level certificates.
I researched for The Hartford Small Business Insurance again for group fitness and personal training insurance, and Small Business coverage too.
UberEats and DoorDash increases deliveries because students were returning and peaked because I hibernate during the winter. During the winter, there are no deliveries.
I began my research in VISAs to the European Union and how to make the most of 90 days to make it a one-way trip.
Apple impressed me with AppleCare program for repairing the front glass of the iPhone. Belkin Invisiglass was very good, but was taking on a lot of beating. Belkin replaced one out of four registered purchases. It was not cheap protecting the Apple iPhone.
I participated with Snow Companies and Gilead Advisory Board.
I did order Walmart using DoorDash.
I used UberEats to deliver my meals.
I signed up for a Cannabis Delivery Driver, but they did not allow footwalkers or bike so you had to have a vehicle with insurance.
I had to renew my Massachusetts SNAP or Food Stamps with Massachusetts Department of Transition Assistance.
I had to renew my MassHealth (BMC Community Health Plan) with Massachusetts Department of Transition Assistance.
I donated to Massachusetts General Hospital, St. Francis House, and Pine Street Inn.
I did not win the Massachusetts VaxMillions giveaway, but registered.
I had my second Federal Express Fitness for Duty Evaluation.
I participated with Centers for Disease Control VAERS and vaccine safety programs in giving feedback on the COVID-19 vaccination process.
Other organizations, such as St. Francis House, Pine Street Inn, Crunch Fitness, and Planet Fitness, tried to continue the assaults or touching after Federal Express and BPHC Southampton. Stay on lookout for 2022 posts on how I am handling those organizations (South Carolina, Georgia, and Washington, DC know what I do).
0 notes
mdheatherd · 2 years
Text
Columbia Maryland Bankruptcy Lawyer Reviews Columbia Remarkable 5 Star Review by Keon 410-692-0821
Columbia Maryland Bankruptcy Lawyer Reviews Columbia Remarkable 5 Star Review by Keon 410-692-0821 SUPER HAPPY WITH OUTCOME Heather Dickerson MD Bankruptcy Attorney https://ift.tt/T1rzjqi 4106920821 Columbia Maryland Bankruptcy Lawyer Reviews Columbia reviews New Rating I shopped around for a reasonable price Attorney for a while before I settle with Heather. Her price was very very low compared to other Attorney’s around town who are charging $1000+ at least. At first I was a little scared considering we never met , we did everything over the phone because of this Covid-19 pandemic. But I did research on her before any money was handed over and she didn’t accept any until the next day when my 30 minute consultation was scheduled and concluded. That gained my trust and she never pressured me to do anything or harassed me for money. In fact she allowed me to make small payments because I didn’t have it all at once which worked out great!! All my paperwork was filed on time , she kept me updated with what was going on and what Documents she needed from me. She explains every detail about your case to you and tells you what to expect. This whole process was smooth and problem free. I wouldn’t pick a different Attorney even if they was cheaper, she is that good at what she do. I wish I could give you 20 stars!!!!! Thank you Heather much love. Top Columbia, MD bankruptcy lawyers Bankruptcy Attorneys Serving Baltimore (Baltimore Maryland). Baltimore's best bankruptcy lawyer. Providing support in communities for more than ten years. Get in touch now! Super Lawyers ® free consultancy bankruptcy lawyers servicing Columbia Maryland. We can create innovative solutions to debt reduction. Consultations. 5 out of 5 stars Super Lawyers TM Free Consultation Bankruptcy lawyers who provide exemplary representation for the Columbia area. Cases are contested across Maryland. Super Lawyer with AV rating. Filing bankruptcy in Columbia, Maryland Bankruptcy Tell me the best way to file bankruptcy? Columbia Bankruptcy Lawyers - Estimated Costs Bankruptcy lawyers in Columbia Maryland can help you Types of Bankruptcy How can I file bankruptcy in Columbia Maryland for free? How can I check my lawyer's discipline? Tell me the best question to ask a bankruptcy lawyer? Maryland exemptions Take Bankruptcy Course Take Credit Counseling Maryland bankruptcy forms Complete the bankruptcy form Print your bankruptcy forms Collect Columbia bankruptcy documents Attend Your 341 Meetings Go to court to file your forms Mail Documents to Your Trustee Dealing with Your Car Get your Filing Fees Maryland Means Test Free Web App Follow us from Affordable MD Bankruptcy Lawyer Heather Dickerson https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3OAht-K3rs via IFTTT
0 notes
stepbeetle81 · 2 years
Text
School Of Graduate Psychology
Full-time students complete programs in two years, while students who have outside responsibilities or need to continue working often take three or more years to complete a program. The length of a program depends on many factors, such as the specialty you are pursuing, whether you can attend full-time or part-time, and the length of a thesis or internship. Full-time students complete their programs in two years, while students with outside responsibilities or who must continue to work often take three or more years to complete a program. Our graduate certificate programs let you focus on the learning that matters to you, strengthening your knowledge and skills in high-demand fields.
Many counseling psychology programs are specifically designed for older people who may be working full time and/or have families.
Graduate students in the School Psychology Program are expected to engage in all aspects of the research process including presentations at national conventions and publications in top-ranked journals in the field.
Accreditation by the American Psychological Association indicates that the program meets the APA's minimum qualifications.
Ohio State University's Department of Psychology is recognized for its extended history and contribution to research and teaching in the field of psychology.
Financial Support - We provide financial support--including a stipend, tuition waiver, and health insurance--to all incoming students. NASP recently developed a 2nd Round Candidate Match process where students missing the first general wave of applications can identify programs still accepting applications and considering new candidates through late Spring or early Summer. The Nondiscrimination and Equal Opportunity Policy outlines NASP's commitment to nondiscrimination and the promotion of equal opportunity, fairness, justice, and respect for all persons. Always submit an essay even if it's optional; essays allow you to personalize your application in a way that other materials in the package cannot.
Tumblr media
Psychology And Graduate School Misconceptions
Thus, our program includes the following competency components not often found in traditional clinical psychology training. In general, the Department of Psychology seeks graduate student applicants who aspire to doctoral-level training. Many of these applicants apply directly after completing their undergraduate degrees from universities across the nation. Some students who have completed master's degree programs elsewhere also are admitted. In such cases, the student's transcripts are reviewed, and transfer credit is authorized for courses deemed comparable to ours in content and quality. The amount of coursework that is transferable is evaluated on a course-by-course basis.
Commencement a Time Of Celebration For Thousands Of
https://tennesseetsc.org/ Many graduates of the program go on to work in educational and health settings such as schools, colleges, hospitals, and clinics. At the famed Columbia Teachers College, students can earn an MEd in Mental Health Counseling. Strengths of the program include its focus on cultural diversity and social justice, its commitment to experiential training, and its emphasis on providing students with adequate opportunities to conduct research. With an extensive knowledge of human behavior and mental health, you will be an asset in any field and have an advantage over other candidates when applying to jobs. With in-depth knowledge of human behavior and mental health, you will be an asset in any field and have an edge over other candidates when applying for jobs. The basic admission requirements for a master’s degree in psychology can be similar from school to school, but each program can also have its own admission criteria. Most programs require your undergraduate GPA and transcripts, an essay, and letters of recommendation. Advanced degrees such as master’s and doctoral degrees can be a significant financial investment. An advanced seminar that considers current research in social psychology. Contemporary research conducted by the seminar participants is discussed. For a full list of faculty members and fellows please visit the department or program website. A decision as to whether the student has passed the general examination is made by the student’s committee. The basic criterion for passing the examination is the faculty's conviction that the student is prepared to begin work on the doctoral dissertation. In addition to taking prerequisite classes, you will most likely need to then take the GRE and psychology subject test before submitting your application for admission. SGP curricula are designed to build and integrate the many components and aspects of psychological practice. SGP emphasizes community involvement and flexible, diversity-appropriate, practical applications of scientific psychology. The school also offers internship opportunities, as well as services to the public through thePacific Psychology & Comprehensive Health Clinicin two locations. All career paths and services in School of Graduate Psychology reflect core values of compassion, integrity, diversity, and discovery. All programs lead to meaningful careers that allow students to apply their skills and knowledge acquired in the program in work that can range from clinical service to administration to teaching to research and more. The program prepares practitioners for work in hospital and medical settings, community clinics, university counseling centers, corrections, and private practice. Our students advance the common good in many settings by providing evidence-based and culturally responsive care to the clients they serve. There are many reasons why I chose to pursue my graduate degree at Marist. The cohorts are small and this is important to me because it gives me the opportunity to establish relationships with faculty and candidates. Most of the professors have a past experience as working school psychologists where they relate real experience to what we are learning in class. Some, but not all, graduate programs require the GRE Subject Test in Psychology, in addition to the GRE General Test. UA offers a renowned, CACREP-accredited MA in Rehabilitation Counseling. In this wholly online program, students get to watch live class lectures and take classes in career development, ethics, research methods, life-span development, and psychopathology. In this CACREP-accredited program, students study disability management, ethical practices, and the social and psychological side of disabilities. Psychologists serve in a variety of roles in our society, from marriage and family therapists, to forensic psychologists, to school psychologists. If you are not sure you want to pursue a degree in counseling, you may enroll in a non-degree course first. After completing 1-3 non-degree courses, you can apply to the MA in Counseling Psychology program. When admitted, you can apply those course credits to your MA program. When you matriculate into Marist’s MA in School Psychology program, you will be able to graduate with confidence knowing that obtaining employment as a School Psychologist is well within reach.
1 note · View note
Text
https://www.debtconsolidationbc.com/credit-counselling-services-surrey-british-columbia/
0 notes
cidnero · 3 years
Text
just read babygirl as bagel i am creating new forms of endearment
2 notes · View notes
expertwitness · 3 years
Video
youtube
Foreclosure, Disguised Sale - Stolen home
0 notes
rakibahameed01 · 3 years
Text
Hello, Are you looking for a logo for work? If you want create a logo design for your company, you can contact me. If your business has an old logo, you can create a new one. I can give you better service than all other vendors. Order Here:-
0 notes
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Lynn Ann Conway (born January 2, 1938) is an American computer scientist, electrical engineer, inventor, and transgender activist.
Conway is notable for a number of pioneering achievements. She worked at IBM in the 1960s and is credited with the invention of generalized dynamic instruction handling, a key advance used in out-of-order execution, used by most modern computer processors to improve performance. She is also widely-known for the Mead-Conway VLSI chip design revolution in very large scale integrated (VLSI) microchip design. That revolution spread rapidly through the research universities and computing industries during the 1980s, incubating an emerging electronic design automation industry, spawning the modern ‘foundry’ infrastructure for chip design and production, and triggering a rush of impactful high-tech startups in the 80s and 90s.
Conway grew up in White Plains, New York. Conway was shy and experienced gender dysphoria as a child. She became fascinated and engaged by astronomy (building a 6-inch (150 mm) reflector telescope one summer) and did well in math and science in high school. Conway entered MIT in 1955, earning high grades but ultimately leaving in despair after an attempted gender transition in 1957–58 failed due to the medical climate at the time. After working as an electronics technician for several years, Conway resumed education at Columbia University's School of Engineering and Applied Science, earning B.S. and M.S.E.E. degrees in 1962 and 1963.
Conway was recruited by IBM Research in Yorktown Heights, New York in 1964, and was soon selected to join the architecture team designing an advanced supercomputer, working alongside John Cocke, Brian Randell, Herbert Schorr, Ed Sussenguth, Fran Allen and other IBM researchers on the Advanced Computing Systems (ACS) project, inventing multiple-issue out-of-order dynamic instruction scheduling while working there. The Computer History Museum has stated that "the ACS machines appears to have been the first superscalar design, a computer architectural paradigm widely exploited in modern high-performance microprocessors.
After learning of the pioneering research of Harry Benjamin in treating transsexual women and realising that gender affirmation surgery was now possible, Conway sought his help and became his patient. After suffering from severe depression from gender dysphoria, Conway contacted Benjamin, who agreed to provide counseling and prescribe hormones. Under Benjamin's care, Conway began her medical gender transition. While struggling with life in a male role, Conway had been married to a woman and had two children. Under the legal constraints then in place, she was denied access to their children after transitioning. Although she had hoped to be allowed to transition on the job, IBM fired Conway in 1968 after she revealed her intention to transition. IBM apologized for this in 2020. 
In 1987, Conway met her husband Charles "Charlie" Rogers, a professional engineer who shares her interest in the outdoors, including whitewater canoeing and motocross racing. They soon started living together, and bought a house with 24 acres (9.7 ha) of meadow, marsh, and woodland in rural Michigan in 1994.On August 13, 2002, they were married. In 2014, the University of Michigan's The Michigan Engineer alumni magazine documented the connections between Conway's engineering explorations and the adventures in her personal life.
21 notes · View notes
cucircula · 5 years
Text
Columbia, Iowa Consumer Credit Counseling Service | (888) 551-1270
Columbia, Iowa Free Consumer Credit Counseling Service call (888) 551-1270 Credit Repair, Bankruptcy Counseling, Foreclosure Prevention, Student Loan Debt Consolidation, Wage Garnishment and Vehicle Repossession solutions, Mortgage Loan Modification, and Debt Settlement through chapter 13. Columbia, Iowa Credit counseling (888) 551-1270 starts with the parent and may include intermediaries later in life empowered by the individual debtor to act on their behalf to negotiate with creditors and resolve debt that is beyond a debtor’s ability to pay. Credit counseling is a generic name and is not a brand name owned or controlled by any agency or company.
Columbia, Iowa Consumer credit counseling services (888) 551-1270 are provided by attorneys, accountants, finance and tax professionals, for-profit, and non-profit credit counseling companies. Regulations on credit counseling and credit counseling agencies varies by country and sometimes within regions of the countries themselves. In Columbia, Iowa individuals filing Chapter 13 bankruptcy are required to receive counseling from a designated credit counseling agency.
https://consumercreditcounselingserviceusa.blogspot.com/p/elsah-illinois-consumer-credit.html
https://youtu.be/WO4K3qzatco
youtube
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfTN0YE2RqXTS_aicckYgvQ/about
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDHhUEe6WnEWUW2vYBCa1ug/about
copyright © 2016 Privacy Policy
from Columbia, Iowa Consumer Credit Counseling Service | (888) 551-1270 via Columbia, Iowa Consumer Credit Counseling Service | (888) 551-1270 July 21, 2019 at 12:50PM Copyright © July 21, 2019 at 12:50PM
0 notes