Tumgik
#Confirmation Bias
creature-wizard · 4 months
Note
What's so bad about angel numbers?
So the main problem with angel numbers that I see, is that they make people feel really certain about things that have nothing to do with reality.
For example, you might have this spiritual kinda person who meets this New Ager who's deep into QAnon-type conspiracy theories, and while they're chatting the first person sees that the clock says 11:11 and thinks that she must be on the right path. So she feels really, really sure of herself when she comes out of this conversation convinced that Donald Trump is saving children from satanic blood-drinking pedophiles.
The same kind of thing can happen with any kind of synchronicity, of course. (Or seeming synchronicity, at least. The frequency illusion is a hell of a thing.) Confirmation bias pulls people deeper and deeper into worldviews and beliefs completely unhinged from reality.
And like, I've experienced synchronicities myself, some of which seem way too wild to be coincidental, so I know how compelling these experiences can be. But at the same time, I know that these synchronicities had nothing to do with any sort of grand spiritual journey toward the truth, because they were basically always about whatever random shit I was fixating on at the time. This whole idea that synchronicities must be some grand cosmic sign is extremely dangerous.
327 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
"If you do or do not believe in god and do or do not repost this something will or will not happen."
I couldn't believe it! It worked for me!
78 notes · View notes
mrbopst · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
60 notes · View notes
mafaldaknows · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
Twitter: Stopworkplacebullies
221 notes · View notes
intersectionalpraxis · 4 months
Note
And one more thing since I saw your post about how the boycott on Starbucks is working. They're trying to clean up their image
twitter.com/broseph_stalin/status/1737776697485746471?t=YruuqHFqiKmOq4wr923e1Q&s=19
As if a commercial is going to make anyone forget they serve blood coffee.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
I'm honestly not surprised. This is a sign of desperation and it's absolutely appalling. Although this varies contextually, we see this in retail companies across the industries with their 'promised efforts' to 'hire more diversely' without tackling their prejudiced store management and staff and having genuine conversations/actual workshops to address the importance of inclusivity/to unlearn their bigotry and confirmation biases because many Black, Brown, Indigenous, and many more folks have been historically and currently are marginalized and disadvantaged by governments and structures when it comes to work opportunities and career advancements in multiple fields because of racist and xenophobic systems (and the many interconnections of their lived experiences as well).
These companies just want to 'appear' better without making real systemic changes -and it's beyond disturbing.
I worked at a previous company for 3 years, and I didn't sign any NDA's, so sometimes I feel like being more public about what I and many people personally went through -but a majority of their store managers were white women (mostly under 35) and I kid you not -blond as well (there were like 3 women in total from East Asian, and Southeast Asian decents of the 100 or so they had). When later management came at the CEO level (before I left), they had workshops for 'hiring' and a majority of the store managers in my district at the time openly admitted to not calling back names they could 'not pronounce' (among many other aspects). I have a handful of stories that still disgust me to this day, but it happens everywhere and it's disgusting.
So yes, Starbucks is no different (and many thanks for sending this to me, so that other folks can see how nefarious and shameless they continue to be). I always say the companies that appear to be the most friendly/lovely/and family-like are usually the most toxic and riddled with micro-management and prejudices. Yes, there are exceptions, but I have heard so many people (Baristas, specifically -not those in upper management because they have good benefits and hours -will leave because it's too much for them, or they have been through incidents of harassment or bullying and are not supported). Needless to say, never forget how rotten Starbucks is, and be wary of companies you buy from regardless. I think this is an important reminder that there is NO ethical consumption under capitalism, but we can do our best to support businesses that are not part of this huge network that aligns with genocidal and oppressive regimes.
FU Starbucks -and keep boycotting ya'll. I also wanted to show this article I saw the other day -this further reinforces how desperate they are trying to make it seem like they're 'actually a good business.' with 'good intentions,' and it's just absolutely horrifying how people and companies will say they condemn terrorism, while supporting the IOF, who is responsible for mass genociding and killing 20,000+ Palestinian people...
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
25 notes · View notes
dogstomp · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media
Dogstomp #2854 - October 30th
Patreon / Twitter / Discord Server
52 notes · View notes
lifewithchronicpain · 4 months
Text
If you've ever found it puzzling that "do your own research" is a slogan for conspiracy theorists of all stripes, new research may have some answers. While conventional wisdom holds that researching the veracity of fake news would reduce belief in misinformation, a study published on Wednesday in Nature has found that using online search engines to vet conspiracies can actually increase the chance that someone will believe it. The researchers point to a known problem in search called "data voids." Sometimes, there's not a lot of high-quality information to counter misleading headlines or surrounding fringe theories. So, when someone sees an article online about an “engineered famine” due to COVID-19 lockdowns and vaccines, and conducts an unsophisticated search based on those keywords, they may find articles that reaffirm their bias.
17 notes · View notes
senorbouquet · 6 months
Text
the only AI content I would support if someone made a Confirmation Bias website that AI generated fake online discussion that was 100% in agreement with every shitty niche opinion I have
19 notes · View notes
catofoldstones · 20 days
Text
Tumblr media
8 notes · View notes
Quote
Be careful. People like to be told what they already know. Remember that. They get uncomfortable when you tell them new things. New things…well, new things aren’t what they expect. They like to know that, say, a dog will bite a man. That is what dogs do. They don’t want to know that a man bites a dog, because the world is not supposed to happen like that. In short, what people think they want is news, but what they really crave is olds. I can see you’ve got the hang of it already.
Terry Pratchett, The Truth (Discworld series)
57 notes · View notes
imkeepinit · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
12 notes · View notes
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
124 notes · View notes
omegaphilosophia · 7 months
Text
Unraveling Confirmation Bias: How Our Beliefs Shape Our Perspectives
Confirmation bias is a cognitive bias that leads people to interpret, remember, or search for information in ways that confirm their preconceptions or hypotheses. Here are some common things people use as confirmation bias:
Selective Exposure: People tend to expose themselves to information sources and media that align with their existing beliefs.
Selective Perception: They interpret ambiguous information in a way that supports their beliefs.
Selective Retention: People remember information that confirms their existing beliefs better than information that contradicts them.
Cherry-Picking Data: They selectively choose data or examples that support their viewpoint while ignoring or dismissing data that contradicts it.
Seeking Like-Minded Individuals: People often engage with communities or social groups that share their beliefs, reinforcing their existing views.
Misinterpreting Statistics: Individuals may misinterpret statistical data to support their preconceived notions.
Overvaluing Personal Experience: Personal anecdotes and experiences are given more weight than they should be in forming opinions.
Ignoring Expert Opinion: Dismissing expert opinions or scientific consensus when it contradicts one's beliefs.
Confirmation in Social Media Echo Chambers: Social media algorithms often expose users to content that aligns with their views, creating echo chambers where confirmation bias thrives.
Biased Information Search: When researching a topic, people may conduct biased searches, seeking out sources that confirm their beliefs.
Emotional Attachment: Emotional attachment to one's beliefs can make it difficult to consider alternative viewpoints objectively.
Attribution Error: People often attribute their successes to their abilities and their failures to external factors or situations, confirming their self-beliefs.
Groupthink: In group settings, individuals may conform to the group's beliefs to avoid conflict or maintain group cohesion.
Being aware of these tendencies is the first step in mitigating confirmation bias and promoting more open-minded and critical thinking.
9 notes · View notes
lem0nademouth · 21 days
Text
i need westerners to stop saying that no one cares about Palestine because its not true. its just not fucking true. everyone and their mother cares - cares exponentially more than anyone has ever cared about anything else. and then when its revealed that the passion and fervor was all performative or self serving or disingenuous, no one looks around and asks “how did this happen?”. no, they ask “who can we blame”, proclaim “they never really cared anyway”, drag their former allies over hot coals for sullying The Movement - a movement which is a perfect breeding ground for this exact kind of pretending to care for attention. very aspect of the western propal movement functions to reaffirm activists’ beliefs about themselves: I am Good, I am Moral, I am Righteous, I am Superior. so don’t tell me no one cares. the people who do have been shunned from your movement for not meeting your standards of morality. you, on the other hand, only care about yourself.
3 notes · View notes
gold-from-straw · 1 year
Text
youtube
Tim Minchin on confirmation bias being chaotic and fucking brilliant as always
39 notes · View notes
soupscans · 2 years
Text
Why he thinks he has a woman . . .
Tumblr media
The much-anticipated reunion between Yashiro and Doumeki in Chapter 46 turned out to be a heartache. It ended with Yashiro concluding that Doumeki was different from before due to a woman. But had Doumeki really changed? True, he had never kissed Yashiro’s armpit until then, but overall the way he caressed Yashiro’s body is no different from their foreplay in Chapter 24. After all, a person’s behavior in bed is not unilaterally dependent on their relationship status. To unravel exactly why Yashiro thinks Doumeki has a woman, we need to understand the concept of confirmation bias, and to revisit Chapter 44.
Confirmation bias refers to the tendency to process new information in a manner that is consistent with a person’s existing beliefs. This is partly because humans like to feel ‘right’. For example, where an individual has already made up their mind on a certain matter, they will seek out information that validates their decision, and will discount information that indicates otherwise. In particular, confirmation bias manifests itself when individuals look for information that confirms their existing self-views and disregard information in conflict with them.
This is demonstrated in Chapter 44. Yashiro has a very negative view of himself from the outset—he believes he is abnormal and therefore doesn’t deserve to be loved. We see this in Chapter 1, where Yashiro confessed to Doumeki that ‘It’s not possible for someone like me to have a normal romantic relationship.’ Chapter 44 features a conversation between Yashiro and Kamiya in the bathroom, during which Kamiya said, ‘No wonder he [Doumeki] appears unmoved despite being so popular with women.’ This remark actually contains two pieces of information—firstly, that Doumeki is in high demand, and secondly, that he does not respond to this female attention. Any ��ordinary’ listener would interpret Kamiya’s comment to mean that they still stood a chance at winning Doumeki over. However, as Yashiro holds a very negative view of himself, he unconsciously disregarded the second piece of information in favor of the first. This way of processing information helps support his existing belief that he doesn’t deserve to be loved and that sooner or later Doumeki will abandon him. It was at this point that Yashiro formed the tentative hypothesis that Doumeki had dumped him for a woman. In other words, Yashiro actually began to think that Doumeki might have a woman before their reunion sex in Chapter 46.
We can explain the events of Chapter 46 along the same lines. Confirmation bias also manifests itself when an individual tests their tentative hypothesis against available information in a manner that justifies the hypothesis itself. Yashiro was in effect utilizing the sexual encounter to reinforce his hypothesis about Doumeki having a woman, even though the evidence he put forward is weak and logically inconclusive from our perspective as readers.
In short, it is Yashiro himself—not Doumeki—who makes him think he has a woman.
107 notes · View notes