Tumgik
#19th Century
ltwilliammowett · 1 day
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Small golden ship's port and starboard lanterns charms, 19th century
364 notes · View notes
nemfrog · 3 days
Text
Tumblr media
Baby teeth. The mouth and the teeth. 1880.
Internet Archive
223 notes · View notes
the-evil-clergyman · 15 hours
Text
Tumblr media
Reclining Nude by Alphonse Lecadre (1870)
310 notes · View notes
fuv1kinggoreee · 1 day
Text
Tumblr media
141 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
"The punishment of Marcias" from Tiziano, 1575
106 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
Nicola Coughlan as Penelope Featherington in Bridgerton (TV Series, 2020- ). 
124 notes · View notes
frostedmagnolias · 3 days
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Wool Gown
c. 1887-8
The John Bright Collection
69 notes · View notes
blistexenthusiast · 3 days
Text
Tumblr media
gold Art Nouveau gargoyle brooch
56 notes · View notes
base-financial · 12 hours
Text
129 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
submitted by @downtonbaddie7 🩷💛
71 notes · View notes
128 notes · View notes
ltwilliammowett · 21 hours
Text
Tumblr media
Yachtswomen in the late 19th century - Frank
105 notes · View notes
nemfrog · 2 days
Text
Tumblr media
Blasted Trees and Flattened Crops, from Thornton's Pastorals of Virgil. 1821.
Met Museum via Internet Archive
140 notes · View notes
five-word-college · 2 days
Text
132 notes · View notes
jewellery-box · 2 days
Text
Wedding dress, American, silk, c. 1851.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
This wedding dress presents a conundrum in that some stylistic aspects of the dress appear to be later than the marriage date of 1851 provided in the original accession records. While the bodice has very fashionable full size pagoda sleeves, which were a new shape in 1851, the skirt with bustle, train and ruffles at bottom is more consistent with the 1870s rather than the dome shape of the 1850s. While it is possible that the skirt was re-made for a later bride, there is no obvious indication of that being the case. Wedding clothes have traditionally been vehicles for fantasy and historicism, however, which may be the case in the styling of this one. It nevertheless is a grand dress made for a wedding in Grace Church, a high society Brooklyn house of worship.
The MET Museum
39 notes · View notes
city-of-ladies · 3 days
Text
The dangers of the combat zone
Tumblr media
"Women accompanying the military were in what military historian John Lynn calls the combat zone, which is
best defined by the intensity and immediacy of danger and by the ability to do direct harm to the enemy… the full reality of war lives here. Modern armies regard it as an innovation to send some women into combat, but in the campaign community all women stood in harm’s way.
It would be odd to imagine that the women accompanying an army, exposed as they were to all the dangers of the military world, didn’t pick up arms and fight. In 1643, in the earlier stages of the English Civil War, a regiment of troops was recalled from Ireland to support King Charles. Rumours swirled that they were accompanied by a regiment of women, and that ‘these were weaponed too; and when these degenerate into cruelty, there are none more bloody’. Indeed, when 120 Irish women were taken prisoner at Nantwich they were discovered to have long knives with them, causing a furore in the press. The dubiously named True Informer excitedly reported that the knives in question were half a yard long, with a hook at the end ‘made not only to stab but to tear the flesh from the very bones’. The likeliest explanation for these knives, however, is that the women weren’t soldiers; they were camp followers, and they needed the knives to help them with pillage and self-defence. 
The women of the campaign community did fight. The Bishop of Albi, on the battlefield of Leucate in southern France to administer to the dying in 1637, came upon the bodies of several women in uniform. ‘These were the real men,’ he was told by the Castilian soldiers, ‘since those who had fled, including certain officers, had conducted themselves like women’. 
Madeleine Kintelberger was a vivandière accompanying the French Seventh Hussar Regiment at Austerlitz in 1805, along with her soldier husband and their six children. The regiment was under heavy attack from Russian forces when her husband was killed by a cannonball, and her children seriously wounded. Madeleine herself had taken a cannonball to the arm, virtually slicing it off below the shoulder. As the Russian Cossacks approached, she scooped up a sword to defend her children, receiving further wounds in both her arms before the family was taken prisoner. Madeleine was six months pregnant and gave birth in captivity. Her bravery was rewarded with a pension from Napoleon. Examples of cantinières fighting are ‘legion’."
Forgotten Warriors, Sarah Percy
45 notes · View notes