Richard Westall - Faust and Lilith (1830s)
121 notes
·
View notes
Anne Elphinstone by George Hayter, 1835
24 notes
·
View notes
Le jour de l'an, by Paul Gavarni, 1835.
New Year's day gifts, like les étrennes? Another 1830s doll, and a bust of Napoleon on the mantel.
17 notes
·
View notes
Pelisse
1835-1840
United States or England
DeWitt Wallace Decorative Arts Museum (Object Number: 1996-273
1K notes
·
View notes
The Destruction of Pharaoh's Host, John Martin, 1836
Pencil and watercolour with gum arabic heightened with bodycolour and with scratching out
23 x 33 ¾ in. (58.4 x 85.7 cm)
980 notes
·
View notes
Louis Daguerre • Paris, 1838
The first photograph of a human being. The exposure time for the image was around seven minutes, and although the street would have been busy with traffic and pedestrians, it appears deserted.
Everything moving was too fast to register on the plate, the only exception is the man at the lower-left; he's getting is shoes shined.
482 notes
·
View notes
ab. 1830 Carriage dress (England)
silk (Gros de Naples), cotton (lace), metal (buckle, hooks and eyes)
(National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne)
607 notes
·
View notes
Extremely rare woman's tie in muslin embroidered with blue flowers and branches. Shaped with Ariadne's thread covered with sky blue silk. Identical choker closed by a hook.
1832-1833
3K notes
·
View notes
Carl Blechen - Country Road in Winter at Moonlight (1836)
1K notes
·
View notes
Oh, saints. This dress combines so many things I love in one place!
First of all, we’re in the late 1830s (by my guess), a time of dress transition. You can see the influence of the Romantic with those sleeves, but the hint of later Victorian gowns in the bodice shaping. The particular bodice here is fan-pleated, which is pretty self-explanatory if you look at the way the fabric is both pleated and fanned out. I do adore the result.
But, ahem, that damask? That color? Purple, always. Of course. For a 200 year old dress, the hue is still so striking. It is not Perkins Purple, however, as it’s two decades too early for that.
The weave? I damn near fell out of my chair looking at it. It’s one of those cases where I wish there were even higher resolutions so I could zoom in and see the stitches. Alas, we are not yet there in terms of technology, so I will instead cope with this.
And then it gets better. Because that silk damask? It’s almost 100 years older than the dress itself. UGH I LOVE IT SO MUCH. Could it have been Spitalfields? Maybe! It’s hard to say because we don’t have the provenance.
From the Maryland Center for History and Culture.
2K notes
·
View notes
Men's double-breasted waistcoat, c. 1835-1845. Silk, lined in cotton, backed with silk twill, with detail of rose design:
The John Bright Collection notes that "The back is adjusted with a tape threaded through three pairs of metal eyelets on tabs. These metal eyelets, patented in the mid 1820s, were a great improvement on the stitched eyelets that preceded them, being able to take greater strain."
1K notes
·
View notes
Dress
c.1836
United Kingdom
The MET (Accession Number: 1971.47.3a–e)
473 notes
·
View notes
Waistcoat
c. 1830s
Silk satin, embroidered with silk and chenille thread
The John Bright Collection
921 notes
·
View notes