136K notes
·
View notes
98K notes
·
View notes
My second entry for the H/D FAN FAIR 2020!!
For the Prompt by Skifazoa: Draco’s nervously perusing a sex shop for the first time when he sees a flash of dark hair across the store. He’d know it anywhere, but why is Potter here? And what on earth is in that box he’s buying? Years of uptight parenting from his parents have left him woefully lacking in knowledge about his newfound interests. Potter’s always been rather uncaring of public opinion, perhaps he could be the one to help Draco figure it all out…
[A less censured version here on Ao3]
[Extras under the cut]
Keep reading
1K notes
·
View notes
Something I appreciate about Monkey Man is how doesn't try to frame revenge as just a pointlessly violent, self-destructive pursuit the way many films do. I think it's because Dev Patel was unafraid of adding a political element to the story. The kid wants to avenge his mother, but he also doesn't want what happened to them to keep happening to others. The presence of the hijras really drives this idea home. They fight with him not only because he's their friend, but because Baba and the nationalist party will bring violence literally to their door even if they don't fight back. I often roll my eyes at anti-revenge narratives. I think Dev Patel gets what it's like to be a victim of systematic violence in a way most filmmakers seem not to. Revenge isn't just a selfish pursuit that perpetuates the ~cycle of violence~, it can also be a desperate desire for the violence to end.
749 notes
·
View notes
James Baldwin, 1979.
5K notes
·
View notes
op turned off reblogs on this post for safety reasons but gave me permission to repost it because it's an important message.
14K notes
·
View notes
I hope everyone who's seen the posts about Dev Patel pushing a knife in with his teeth understands that watching it happen is like a religious experience.
65 notes
·
View notes
Dev Patel for The New York Times (ph: Justin J. Wee)
679 notes
·
View notes
me, watching Dev Patel is beating the shit out of a corrupt and misogynistic chief of police with a high-heeled shoe: Oh, ooh, oooh. Let's go, Dev. Let's go
210 notes
·
View notes
I went into monkey man with pretty high expectations and Dev Patel exceeded every single one of them. Like I knew it was gonna be a good action revenge film that has a good political motivation to it but what i am in awe of is that he is that as a first time director this movie is so visually stunning. the shot compositions. the weird fun angles he comes up with in the middle of action packed scenes. Director Dev Patel has entered the chat and he is not fooling around
225 notes
·
View notes
Horniness is not intrinsically less pure than any other human motivation
33K notes
·
View notes
"nobody in the world, nobody in history, has ever gotten their freedom by appealing to the moral sense of the people who were oppressing them" Assata Shakur
FREE PALESTINE.
41K notes
·
View notes
The New York Times instructed journalists covering Israel’s war on the Gaza Strip to restrict the use of the terms “genocide” and “ethnic cleansing” and to “avoid” using the phrase “occupied territory” when describing Palestinian land, according to a copy of an internal memo obtained by The Intercept.
The memo also instructs reporters not to use the word Palestine “except in very rare cases” and to steer clear of the term “refugee camps” to describe areas of Gaza historically settled by displaced Palestinians expelled from other parts of Palestine during previous Israeli–Arab wars. The areas are recognized by the United Nations as refugee camps and house hundreds of thousands of registered refugees.
The memo — written by Times standards editor Susan Wessling, international editor Philip Pan, and their deputies — “offers guidance about some terms and other issues we have grappled with since the start of the conflict in October.”
While the document is presented as an outline for maintaining objective journalistic principles in reporting on the Gaza war, several Times staffers told The Intercept that some of its contents show evidence of the paper’s deference to Israeli narratives.
[...]
Despite the memo’s framing as an effort to not employ incendiary language to describe killings “on all sides,” in the Times reporting on the Gaza war, such language has been used repeatedly to describe attacks against Israelis by Palestinians and almost never in the case of Israel’s large-scale killing of Palestinians.
In January, The Intercept published an analysis of New York Times, Washington Post, and Los Angeles Times coverage of the war from October 7 through November 24 — a period mostly before the new Times guidance was issued. The Intercept analysis showed that the major newspapers reserved terms like “slaughter,” “massacre,” and “horrific” almost exclusively for Israeli civilians killed by Palestinians, rather than for Palestinian civilians killed in Israeli attacks.
The analysis found that, as of November 24, the New York Times had described Israeli deaths as a “massacre” on 53 occasions and those of Palestinians just once. The ratio for the use of “slaughter” was 22 to 1, even as the documented number of Palestinians killed climbed to around 15,000.
1K notes
·
View notes
Dr Ghassan Abu Sitta, who was a lead surgeon in Gaza and particularly at Al-Shifa hospital, is barred from entering Germany.
6K notes
·
View notes
I didn’t miss that social cue I just thought it was stupid
165K notes
·
View notes
Why do so many people make tiktoks while they're clearly driving. What the fuck. Stop that shit, you're gonna kill someone.
77K notes
·
View notes