cutisn

[cutisn]

The specter of Marx’s communism has wreaked havoc on mankind for nearly a century, persecuting billions of people and causing hundreds of millions of deaths. The civilizations created by mankind that are suitable for human existence have gradually been wiped out and replaced by praises of peace. Touted the "new culture and new ideas" of Marx and his doctrine. Its heyday ruled nearly half of the world's population and occupied more than half of the world's livable land. When this seemingly invincible ghost stretched out its claws to try to include the entire world in its bag, it suddenly fell to the ground at the end of the 20th century. The state apparatus it built to tightly control and suppress people’s dissatisfaction quickly spread across all communist countries. The land fell apart and disappeared, and Marx’s communist movement failed!!!

Although Marxism has failed, if we cannot find out the reason for its failure theoretically, it is easy to resurrect under the temptation of communism with a golden halo and find its believers again. This article attempts to find out the reason for its failure. I am not convinced that the arguments put forward are correct. It is enough to put it forward.

What Marx said is socialism-communism. Marx believes that all affairs in the world have regularities, and human development has regularities: from primitive society to feudal society to capitalist society, and finally into communist society." There is a communist primary stage of socialism. "In a communist society, there is no private property, and all materials are common property owned by the whole people. The name of the Communist Party comes from this. Everyone is working consciously to the best of his ability. Without currency, people just need to go to the store to get it. At this time, material abundance (because everyone consciously works to the best of his ability) can meet all needs. This is a blissful communist society with no exploitation, no oppression, no fraud, no personal property and family. According to the objective laws of human development, a communist society will definitely come.

Marx did not say that since capitalism has developed to a certain stage, it will definitely be replaced by communism. Why not wait patiently for the arrival of communism instead of asking humans to kill each other and create a socialism. If it is said that the replacement of capitalism by communism can only be achieved by breaking capitalism with violence, how can it be said that it is inevitable that communism replaces capitalism?

Marx kept telling the poor that you are poor because your property has been exploited and looted by the rich. Because Marx discovered the so-called surplus labor value that is deducted by the rich when the poor work for the rich. According to Marx's plan, the poor should unite to form their own organization, the Communist Party, and then be armed with violence to overthrow the rich government, and establish governments at all levels elected by the poor, so that the country will be in power by the poor. The poor are no longer exploited when they are in power to work for themselves, and everyone will be full of energy to work. After the violent seizure of power has completed the plunder of the rich, all means of production belong to the whole people, that is, to the state, and all means of production become the property of the poor overnight. So how to produce the next step, Marx has already planned-implement a planned economy-plan by an authoritative department. The country will produce whatever the market lacks, and produce as much as the lack, so that there will be no blind competition in capitalist society The resulting overproduction and the superiority of the planned economy are much higher than the disorderly competition in the capital market. In this way, the rapid development of the economy will soon lead to a huge abundance of material and enter the communist society. Politically, Marx planned that the leaders of all levels of government and various institutions were elected by the masses under him. The poor proletarians are the most revolutionary. They can do everything responsibly for themselves and other proletarians.

Like the godfather wishing to his followers, Marx painted a bright future for communism and a specific implementation plan for the world. However, when his believers practiced his plan, they found that doing exactly according to his plan often did not work. Instead of following his plan, he turned his back on Marxism. Biting the bullet and doing it the result was a complete failure of Marxism, and almost all of the communist countries collapsed.

Practice is the only criterion for testing truth. The failure of the Marxist-Communist movement shows that communism is a utopia and cannot be realized.

Communism failed in its initial stage-socialism. In fact, it only succeeded in seizing power in a few countries, and no country succeeded in implementing a planned economy. The success of the seizure of power in several countries, except Russia, was achieved with the help of other communist countries.

Why did Marxism-Communism fail? What's the problem? We know that Marxism encourages the proletariat to rise up and rebellion. It believes that the proletariat is the simplest, most upright and most revolutionary spirit. After the proletarian seizes power, he has a share in all of himself. The common property of the whole people will be cared for, everyone will work hard, and the whole world is a big and loving family. The elected administrative officials will work hard to serve the people. Marx believes that the proletariat is the most selfless, and socialist communism will be even more selfless without private property. Here Marx has forgotten or neglected one thing, self-interest is the instinct of all living things in the world, and human beings can't do anything else. Marxism wants the Communist Party, which has seized the state power, to implement a one-party dictatorship. The reason is that the Communist Party is the most advanced party and the party of the proletarians. Now the country is a proletarian country with a set goal of progress. Naturally, other forces and people are not allowed to come. Mix together. A one-party dictatorship can lead to an inner-party dictatorship and an inner-party dictatorship can become a one-party dictatorship. Driven by the self-interested instinct, people want to keep their vested interests and obtain new benefits. One-party dictatorship allows them to do this. In order to consolidate the one-party dictatorship system, many laws and decrees restricting freedom were enacted. This caused great dissatisfaction among people and eventually led to the collapse of the dictatorship. Economically, all means of production in socialist countries are owned by the state, eliminating competition, resulting in a decline in labor efficiency, and people with high labor efficiency and low efficiency get the same rewards and tend to make people unable to work. As for the communist society, each does its best to get what it needs. Under the self-interested nature of human beings, it is almost impossible to realize it. Human nature is like leisure and dislike work. Moreover, the workload of one person is less. The workload of the next person will also be reduced. But nothing is exactly the same. It is human nature to choose the right one, and human desires are endless. This is also nature. There are also common, good and best things in communist society. For example, if people who want to eat apples take apples, they are of course the best ones. Everyone is like this. Naturally, not everyone can get the best. Some people will find ways to eat. One will take two and the other will be eaten next time. It is natural for this to happen, and it is happening in all aspects. Can Marx’s communism have everything it needs? Can a society exist?

Marxism believes that people's consciousness will be greatly improved in the socialist stage, because the state is the poor state and the state power is the poor state. Ironically, the consciousness of the dictator who led the socialist country to the communist society has not Without improvement, in order to keep his throne, he does not appoint people on his merits, and even throws the whole country into a catastrophe for his own personal gain. Marxism relies on these selfish dictators to lead the country to a society of equality, freedom, selfless fraternity and love? It is not that these dictators are different, but are caused by human nature. Since human nature dictates whoever goes up, it will be the same, but the degree is different.

Marx created a communist society, but no one has seen this society. Everyone has doubts about whether it can be realized. Marx has two main reasons for this. The first is: Marx believes that everything has its own law of development. It is the inevitable law of social development that Communism replaces capitalism based on human will. Second, human beings have experienced communist society in the past, that is, primitive communist society, so it should be a logical thing to enter a more advanced communist society. Let me talk about first, things have their own development laws and will not change according to people's will, this sentence is not wrong. But why does Marxism conclude that according to the laws of social development, capitalism will surely perish in a few years? The world will definitely enter the communist society they designed and will not enter other social forms, including the societies that we do not yet know and have not yet thought of form. Second, there should have been communist phenomena in the early hunting stage of primitive society. The animals caught must be eaten in time and cannot be preserved. Grain harvested in the farming stage can be stored and eaten slowly. People have short-term wealth and wait for a long time. The slow increase in wealth leads to private property. The emergence of private property is a progressive phenomenon. Just imagine if the surplus food is still put together and belongs to the public, no one will look after it carefully. If it is distributed to individuals Individuals will protect it carefully. So when there is excess, it is distributed to individuals. In the future, if you have a family, it will be more private property. Primitive communism will die out due to excess property, and Marx's communism will be established due to the increase in property. Is this possible?

Why Marxism failed

Marx’s communist illusion is like a perpetual motion machine. The perfect design in all aspects is that it violates the laws of nature in a small key place. The perpetual motion machine can never move and communism can never be realized. In his later years, Marx said that he was not a Marxist. Maybe Marx found the mistakes in his theory, but he couldn't bear to deny the results of his life's struggle publicly, so he made this suggestion.

Marxism believes that the economic foundation determines the superstructure, and the elimination of private ownership also eliminates the idea of ​​private ownership. Marx does not know that the self-interested nature of people is the basis of private ownership. Marx was a thinker, a theorist, a jurist, and a prophet but not a physiologist. It is not surprising that the mistake of thinking that human nature can be changed.

The failure of Marxism lies in treating the self-interested nature of human beings as the superstructure, thinking that as long as the economic base changes the self-interested nature will change, and the self-interested nature is not the superstructure. It is the foundation of all living things that is inherently immutable, and competition will It is a manifestation of the self-interested nature. Self-interest and competition are two necessary conditions for the existence of living beings. A creature without self-interested nature cannot come to the world and cannot survive, and competition failure will be eliminated. There is an old saying in China that "people are not for themselves, and the heavens and the earth are destroyed." That's what I mean. Illusion to eliminate competition and change people’s self-interested nature to create a happy society can only be a waste of water. But after all, humans are advanced animals. Humans control their self-interested nature within a reasonable range through moral education and legal punishment, so that humans can move forward smoothly。 马克思主义为何失败。 马克思的共产主义幽灵在肆虐了人类将近一个世纪，迫害了数十亿的人造成数亿的死亡，人类有史以来创造出的各种适合人类生存的文明，逐渐被其消灭，代之以歌颂和 吹捧马克思及其主义的"新文化新思想"。 其最盛期统治了世界人口的近一半，占据了世界宜居土地的一半以上。 这个看似不可战胜的幽灵伸出魔爪试图将整个世界纳入它的囊中之时，在20世纪末却突然坠地而亡，其所构筑的严密控制和镇压人民不满的国家机器在各个共产国家中迅速 土崩瓦解烟消云散，马克思的共产主义运动失败了!!!

虽然马克思主义失败了，如果我们不能从理论上找出其失败的原因，那在披着金色光环的共产主义的诱惑下很容易死灰复燃，重新找到它的信仰者。 本文试图找出它失败的原因，并不确信所提论点是正确的，提出来起到抛砖引玉的作用就可以了。

马克思所说的社会主义-共产主义是什么，马克思认为世间一切事务都有规律性，人类的发展也有规律性: 从原始社会发展到封建社会再到资本主义社会，最后进入共产主义社会"这期间 有一个共产主义的初级阶段社会主义"在共产主义社会里没有私人财产一切物质都是全民所有的共同财产--共产党的名字由此而来--每个人都在自觉地尽自己的能力劳动， 没有了货币人们需要什么去商店里取就行了。 这时候物质极大的丰富(因为每个人都自觉地尽自己的能力劳动)可以满足所有的需求。 这是一个没有剥削没有压迫没有欺诈没有个人财产和家庭的极乐共产社会。 按照人类发展的客观规律共产社会是一定会来到的。

马克思没有讲既然资本主义发展到一定阶段就一定会被共产主义所取代，何不耐心等待共产主义的到来而非要人类自相残杀，人造出一个社会主义。 如果说共产主义取代资本主义必须以暴力打碎资本主义才能实现，那怎么能说共产主义取代资本主义是客观规律是必然的呢?

马克思喋喋不休地告诉穷人，你们之所以穷是因为你们的财产被富人剥削掠夺去了。 因为马克思发现了穷人给富人打工时被富人克扣去的所谓剩余劳动价值。 按照马克思的规划穷人要团结起来成立自己的组织-共产党，然后武装起来用暴力推翻富人政府，成立由穷人选举产生的各级政府，这样这个国家就由穷人掌权了。 穷人掌权为自己劳动了不再受剥削了，每个人都会焕发出冲天的干劲来工作。 在用暴力夺取政权完成了对富人的掠夺，一切生产资料归全民也就是归国家，所有的生产资料一夜之间成了穷人的财产。 那么下一步怎么生产呢，马克思已经规划好了--实行计划经济--由一个权威部门做计划国家缺什么市场缺什么就生产什么，缺多少生产多少，这样不会出现资本主义社会的盲目竞争 导致的生产过剩，计划经济的优越性大大高于资本市场的无序竞争。 这样经济高速发展很快物质就会极大的丰富而进入共产主义社会。 在政治上马克思规划的是各级政府和各类机构的领导人由其属下的群众选举产生，穷人无产者是最革命的他们能为自己和其他无产者的事情负责任的去做好一切。

马克思像教父对他的信徒许愿一样为世人描绘了一幅共产主义的美好前景及具体的实施方案，但当他的信仰者实践他的规划时，发现完全照他的方案办往往走不通，而 不照他的方案办又背弃了马克思主义。 硬着头皮干下去其结果是马克思主义彻底失败，共产国家几乎全部垮台。

实践是检验真理的唯一标准，马克思主义-共产主义运动的失败说明了共产主义是一个乌托邦，是不可能实现的。

共产主义在其初级阶段-社会主义就失败了，实际上它只是在夺取政权方面在几个国家成功了，搞计划经济没一个国家成功。 夺取政权能在几个国家成功除了俄罗斯以外都是在其它共产国家的帮助下取得的。

马克思主义-共产主义为什么会失败，它的问题出在哪里? 我们知道马克思主义鼓动无产者起来造反，它认为无产者最单纯最正直最具有革命精神，无产者夺取政权以后面对所有的自己都有一份的 全民共同财产会悉心爱护，每个人都会努力工作，整个世界就是一个友爱大家庭。 而民选上的行政官员会认真努力的为人民服务。 马克思认为无产者最无私，而到了社会主义共产主义没有了私人财产会更加无私。 这里马克思忘了或是疏忽了一件事，利己是世界上所有生物的本能，人类也概莫能外。 马克思主义要夺取了国家政权的共产党实行一党独裁的统治，理由是共产党是最先进的党，是无产者的党，现在国家是无产者的国家有既定的前进目标，自然不允许其它势力和人来 搀合。 一党独裁可以导致党内的独裁而党内的独裁可以变成一党独裁。 人在利己本能的驱使下都想保住既得利益获取新利益，一党独裁可以让他们做到这一点。 为了巩固一党独裁体制又制定了许多限制自由的法律法令。 这引起了人们的极大不满，最终导致独裁党的垮台。 经济上社会主义国家一切生产资料归国家所有取消了竞争，造成劳动效率的下降，而劳动效率高和效率低的人拿一样的报酬趋使人们出工不出力。 至于共产主义社会各尽所能各取所需，在人的利己本性下几无实现的可能，人的天性是好逸恶劳，而且攀比心重，一个人工作量少了旁边的人工作量也会减少。 而任何东西都不会完全一样，挑好的拿是人的本性，人的欲望没有止境这也是天性。 共产主义社会东西也有一般，好，最好之分，譬如想吃苹果的人去拿苹果当然是挑好的拿，人人都这样自然不是每个人都能得到最好的，有人会想办法吃 一个拿两个另一个留在下次吃。 出现这种情况是很自然的，各个方面都出现这种情况马克思的共产主义各取所需的社会能存在吗?

马克思主义认为在社会主义阶段人们的觉悟就会有极大的提高，因为国家是穷人的国家政权是穷人的政权，可具讽刺意味的是带领社会主义国家向共产社会前进的独裁者的觉悟并 没有提高，为了保住自己的宝座，并不任人唯賢，甚至为了一已的私利不惜把整个国家投入一场大浩劫。 马克思主义依靠这些私欲遮天的独裁者带领国家走向平等自由无私博爱的社会岂不缘木求鱼? 不是这些独裁者属于另类而是人性使然，既然人性使然换哪个人上去都会如此，只是程度大小不同而已 。

马克思创造出了一个共产主义社会，但没有一人见过这个社会，能不能实现每个人都会存有疑虑，对此马克思有两大依据，其1是: 马克思认为事物都有自己的发展规律，不 以人的意志为转移，共产主义取代资本主义是社会发展的必然规律，其2，人类过去经历过共产社会即原始共产主义社会，所以再进入更高级的共产社会应该是顺理成章的事。 先说其1，事物都有自己的发展规律且不会按照人们的意志而转移，这句话没有错。 但是马克思主义凭什么断定按照社会发展规律，若干年后资本主义肯定会灭亡世界肯定会进入他们设计的共产社会而不会进入其它的社会形态,包括我们现在还不知道的和还没想到的社会 形态。 其2，原始社会的早期狩猎阶段应该出现过共产现象，扑获的动物要及时吃掉不能保存，到了农耕阶段收下的粮食可以储存慢慢吃，人们有了短时间的财富，以候慢 慢的财富的增多就有了私人财产，私人财产的出现是一个进步现象，试想如果多余出来的粮食还是放在一起属于公共的，谁也不会去仔细照看它，如果把它分给个人每 个人都会仔细的保护它。 所以当吃饱肚子还有多余的存在时就分给个人了。 再往后有了家庭就更是私人财产了，原始共产主义由于有了多余的财产而消亡，马克思的共产主义由于财产的增多而建立，这可能吗 ?

马克思的共产主义幻想就像一台永动机，各方面都设计的完美无缺可就是在一个小的关键的地方违背了自然规律，永动机就永远不能动弹共产主义就永远不能实现。 马克思晚年曾说过他不是一个马克思主义者，也许马克思发现了自己学说的鈕误，但又不忍心公开否定自己奋斗一生的成果，故做此暗示。

马克思主义认为经济基础决定上层建筑，消灭了私有制也就消除了私有制思想，马克思不知道人的利己天性才是私有制的基础。 马克思是一个思想家，理论家，法律学家，预言家但不是一个生理学家，出现认为人的天性可以改造这样的错误也就不足为奇了。

马克思主义的失败在于将人的利己天性视为上层建筑，认为只要经济基础改变利己的天性将会改变，而利己天性并非上层建筑，它是一切生物的生存基础是天生不可改变的，而竞争则 是利己天性的表现形式，利己和竞争是生物存在的两个必要条件，没有利己天性的生物是不可能来到世界上也不可能生存下去，竞争失败也将被淘汰。 中国有句古语'人不为己，天诅地灭'。 说的就是这个意思。 幻想消除竞争，改变人的利己天性来创造一个美满的社会，只能是竹篮子打水一场空。 但人毕竟是高级动物，人类通过道德教育和法律惩罚将人的利己天性控制在合理的范围内，使人类能够顺利向前发展。只能是竹篮子打水一场空。 但人毕竟是高级动物，人类通过道德教育和法律惩罚将人的利己天性控制在合理的范围内，使人类能够顺利向前发展。

[cutisn]

s

Why Marxism failed

pecter of Marx’s communism has wreaked havoc on mankind for nearly a century, persecuting billions of people and causing hundreds of millions of deaths. The civilizations created by mankind that are suitable for human existence have gradually been wiped out and replaced by praises of peace. Touted the "new culture and new ideas" of Marx and his doctrine. Its heyday dominated nearly half of the world's population and occupied more than half of the world's livable land. When this seemingly invincible ghost stretched out its claws to try to include the entire world in its bag, it suddenly fell to the ground at the end of the 20th century. The state apparatus it built to tightly control and suppress people’s dissatisfaction quickly spread across all communist countries. The land fell apart and disappeared, and Marx’s communist movement failed!!!

Although Marxism has failed, if we cannot find out the reason for its failure theoretically, it is easy to resurrect under the temptation of communism with its golden halo and find its believers again. This article attempts to find out the reason for its failure. I am not convinced that the arguments put forward are correct. It is enough to put it forward.

What Marx said is socialism-communism. Marx believes that all affairs in the world have regularities, and human development has regularities: from primitive society to feudal society to capitalist society, and finally into communist society." There is a communist primary stage of socialism. "In a communist society, there is no private property, and all materials are common property owned by the whole people. The name of the Communist Party comes from this. Everyone is working consciously to the best of his ability. Without currency, people just need to go to the store to get it. At this time, material abundance (because everyone consciously works to the best of his ability) can meet all needs. This is a blissful communist society with no exploitation, no oppression, no fraud, no personal property and family. According to the objective laws of human development, a communist society will definitely come.

Marx did not say that since capitalism has developed to a certain stage, it will definitely be replaced by communism. Why not wait patiently for the arrival of communism instead of asking humans to kill each other and create a socialism. If it is said that the replacement of capitalism by communism can only be achieved by violently breaking capitalism, then how can it be said that it is inevitable that communism replaces capitalism?

Marx kept telling the poor that you are poor because your property has been exploited and looted by the rich. Because Marx discovered the so-called surplus labor value that is deducted by the rich when the poor work for the rich. According to Marx's plan, the poor must unite to form their own organization, the Communist Party, and then be armed to use violence to overthrow the rich government, and establish governments at all levels elected by the poor, so that the country will be in power by the poor. The poor are no longer exploited when they are in power to work for themselves, and everyone will be full of energy to work. After the violent seizure of power has completed the plunder of the rich, all means of production belong to the whole people, that is, to the state, and all means of production become the property of the poor overnight. So how to produce the next step, Marx has already planned-implement a planned economy-plan by an authoritative department. The country will produce whatever the market lacks, and produce as much as the lack, so that there will be no blind competition in the capitalist society. The resulting overproduction, the superiority of the planned economy is much higher than the disorderly competition in the capital market. In this way, the rapid development of the economy will soon become a huge abundance of material and enter the communist society. Politically, Marx planned that the leaders of all levels of government and various institutions would be elected by the masses under him. The poor proletarians are the most revolutionary. They can do everything responsibly for themselves and other proletarians.

Like the godfather wishing to his followers, Marx painted a bright future for communism and a specific implementation plan for the world. However, when his believers practiced his plan, they found that doing exactly according to his plan often did not work. Instead of following his plan, he turned his back on Marxism. Biting the bullet and doing it the result was a complete failure of Marxism, and almost all of the communist countries collapsed.

Practice is the only criterion for testing truth. The failure of the Marxist-Communist movement shows that communism is a utopia and cannot be realized.

Communism failed in its initial stage-socialism. In fact, it only succeeded in seizing power in a few countries, and no country succeeded in implementing a planned economy. The success of the seizure of power in several countries except Russia was achieved with the help of other communist countries.

Why did Marxism-Communism fail? What's the problem? We know that Marxism encourages the proletariat to rise up and rebellion. It believes that the proletariat is the simplest, most upright and most revolutionary spirit. After the proletarian seizes power, he has a share in all of himself The common property of the whole people will be cared for, everyone will work hard, and the whole world is a big and loving family. The elected administrative officials will work hard to serve the people. Marx believes that the proletariat is the most selfless, and socialist communism will be even more selfless without private property. Here Marx has forgotten or neglected one thing, self-interest is the instinct of all creatures in the world, and human beings can't do it. Marxism wants the Communist Party that has seized state power to implement a one-party dictatorship. The reason is that the Communist Party is the most advanced party and the party of the proletarians. Now a country where the country is a proletarian has a set goal of progress, and naturally does not allow other forces and people to come. Mix together. A one-party dictatorship can lead to an inner-party dictatorship and an inner-party dictatorship can become a one-party dictatorship. Driven by the self-interested instinct, people want to keep their vested interests and obtain new benefits. A one-party dictatorship allows them to do this. In order to consolidate the one-party dictatorship system, many laws and decrees restricting freedom were enacted. This caused great dissatisfaction among people and eventually led to the collapse of the dictatorship. Economically, all means of production in socialist countries are owned by the state, eliminating competition, resulting in a decline in labor efficiency, and people with high labor efficiency and low efficiency get the same remuneration and tend to make people unable to work. As for the communist society, each one does what he can to get what he needs. Under the self-interested nature of human beings, it is almost impossible to realize it. Human nature is like leisure and dislike work. Moreover, the workload of a person is less. And nothing is exactly the same. It is human nature to choose the right one, and human desires are endless. This is also nature. There are also common, good and best things in communist society. For example, if people who want to eat apples take apples, they are of course the best ones. Everyone is like this. Naturally, not everyone can get the best. Some people will find ways to eat. One takes two and the other stays for next time. It is natural for this to happen, and it is happening in all aspects. Can Marx’s communism have everything it needs? Can a society exist?

Marxism believes that people's consciousness will be greatly improved in the socialist stage, because the state is the poor state power is the poor people's power, but ironically, the consciousness of the dictator who led the socialist country to the communist society and Without improvement, in order to keep his throne, he does not appoint people on his merits, and even throws the whole country into a catastrophe for his own personal gain. Marxism relies on these selfish dictators to lead the country to a society of equality, freedom, selfless fraternity and love? It is not that these dictators are different, but are caused by human nature. Since human nature dictates whoever goes up, it will be the same, but the degree is different.

Marx created a communist society, but no one has seen this society. Everyone has doubts about whether it can be realized. Marx has two main reasons for this. The first is: Marx believes that everything has its own law of development. It is the inevitable law of social development that Communism replaces capitalism based on human will. Second, human beings have experienced communist society in the past, that is, primitive communist society, so it should be a logical thing to enter a more advanced communist society. Let me talk about first, things have their own laws of development and will not change according to people's will, this sentence is not wrong. But why does Marxism conclude that according to the laws of social development, capitalism will surely perish in a few years? The world will definitely enter the communist society they designed and will not enter other social forms, including the societies that we do not yet know and have not yet thought of form. Second, there should have been communist phenomena in the early hunting stage of primitive society. The animals caught must be eaten in time and cannot be preserved. Grain harvested in the farming stage can be stored and eaten slowly. People have short-term wealth and wait for a long time. The slow increase in wealth leads to private property. The emergence of private property is a progressive phenomenon. Just imagine if the surplus food is still put together and belongs to the public, no one will look after it carefully. If it is distributed to individuals Individuals will protect it carefully. So when there is excess, it is distributed to individuals. In the future, if you have a family, it will be even more private property. Primitive communism died out due to excess property, and Marx's communism was established due to the increase in property. Is this possible?

Marx’s communist fantasy is like a perpetual motion machine. The perfect design in all aspects is that it violates the laws of nature in a small key place. The perpetual motion machine can never move and communism can never be realized. In his later years, Marx said that he was not a Marxist. Maybe Marx found the mistakes in his theory, but he couldn't bear to deny the results of his life's struggle publicly, so he made this suggestion.

Marxism believes that the economic foundation determines the superstructure, and the elimination of private ownership also eliminates the idea of ​​private ownership. Marx does not know that the self-interested nature of people is the basis of private ownership. Marx was a thinker, theorist, legal scientist, and prophet but not a physiologist. It is not surprising that there is a mistake that human nature can change.

The failure of Marxism lies in treating the self-interested nature of human beings as the superstructure, thinking that as long as the economic base changes the self-interested nature will change, and the self-interested nature is not the superstructure. It is the foundation of all living things that is inherently unchangeable, and competition will It is a manifestation of the self-interested nature. Self-interest and competition are the two necessary conditions for the existence of living beings. Without the self-interested creatures, it is impossible to come to the world and survive, and competition failure will be eliminated. There is an old saying in China that "people are not for themselves, the heavens curse and the earth dies." That's what I mean. The fantasy to eliminate competition and change people's self-interested nature to create a happy society can only be nothing but a basket of water. But after all, humans are advanced animals. Humans control their self-interested nature within a reasonable range through moral education and legal punishment, so that humans can move forward smoothly

马克思主义为何失败

马克思的共产主义幽灵在肆虐了人类将近一个世纪，迫害了数十亿的人造成数亿的死亡，人类有史以来创造出的各种适合人类生存的文明，逐渐被其消灭，代之以歌颂和 吹捧马克思及其主义的"新文化新思想"。 其最盛期统治了世界人口的近一半，占据了世界宜居土地的一半以上。 这个看似不可战胜的幽灵伸出魔爪试图将整个世界纳入它的囊中之时，在20世纪末却突然坠地而亡，其所构筑的严密控制和镇压人民不满的国家机器在各个共产国家中迅速 土崩瓦解烟消云散，马克思的共产主义运动失败了!!!

虽然马克思主义失败了，如果我们不能从理论上找出其失败的原因，那在披着金色光环的共产主义的诱惑下很容易死灰复燃，重新找到它的信仰者。 本文试图找出它失败的原因，并不确信所提论点是正确的，提出来起到抛砖引玉的作用就可以了。

马克思所说的社会主义-共产主义是什么，马克思认为世间一切事务都有规律性，人类的发展也有规律性: 从原始社会发展到封建社会再到资本主义社会，最后进入共产主义社会"这期间 有一个共产主义的初级阶段社会主义"在共产主义社会里没有私人财产一切物质都是全民所有的共同财产--共产党的名字由此而来--每个人都在自觉地尽自己的能力劳动， 没有了货币人们需要什么去商店里取就行了。 这时候物质极大的丰富(因为每个人都自觉地尽自己的能力劳动)可以满足所有的需求。 这是一个没有剥削没有压迫没有欺诈没有个人财产和家庭的极乐共产社会。 按照人类发展的客观规律共产社会是一定会来到的。

马克思没有讲既然资本主义发展到一定阶段就一定会被共产主义所取代，何不耐心等待共产主义的到来而非要人类自相残杀，人造出一个社会主义。 如果说共产主义取代资本主义必须以暴力打碎资本主义才能实现，那怎么能说共产主义取代资本主义是客观规律是必然的呢?

马克思喋喋不休地告诉穷人，你们之所以穷是因为你们的财产被富人剥削掠夺去了。 因为马克思发现了穷人给富人打工时被富人克扣去的所谓剩余劳动价值。 按照马克思的规划穷人要团结起来成立自己的组织-共产党，然后武装起来用暴力推翻富人政府，成立由穷人选举产生的各级政府，这样这个国家就由穷人掌权了。 穷人掌权为自己劳动了不再受剥削了，每个人都会焕发出冲天的干劲来工作。 在用暴力夺取政权完成了对富人的掠夺，一切生产资料归全民也就是归国家，所有的生产资料一夜之间成了穷人的财产。 那么下一步怎么生产呢，马克思已经规划好了--实行计划经济--由一个权威部门做计划国家缺什么市场缺什么就生产什么，缺多少生产多少，这样不会出现资本主义社会的盲目竞争 导致的生产过剩，计划经济的优越性大大高于资本市场的无序竞争。 这样经济高速发展很快物质就会极大的丰富而进入共产主义社会。 在政治上马克思规划的是各级政府和各类机构的领导人由其属下的群众选举产生，穷人无产者是最革命的他们能为自己和其他无产者的事情负责任的去做好一切。

马克思像教父对他的信徒许愿一样为世人描绘了一幅共产主义的美好前景及具体的实施方案，但当他的信仰者实践他的规划时，发现完全照他的方案办往往走不通，而 不照他的方案办又背弃了马克思主义。 硬着头皮干下去其结果是马克思主义彻底失败，共产国家几乎全部垮台。

实践是检验真理的唯一标准，马克思主义-共产主义运动的失败说明了共产主义是一个乌托邦，是不可能实现的。

共产主义在其初级阶段-社会主义就失败了，实际上它只是在夺取政权方面在几个国家成功了，搞计划经济没一个国家成功。 夺取政权能在几个国家成功除了俄罗斯以外都是在其它共产国家的帮助下取得的。

马克思主义-共产主义为什么会失败，它的问题出在哪里? 我们知道马克思主义鼓动无产者起来造反，它认为无产者最单纯最正直最具有革命精神，无产者夺取政权以后面对所有的自己都有一份的 全民共同财产会悉心爱护，每个人都会努力工作，整个世界就是一个友爱大家庭。 而民选上的行政官员会认真努力的为人民服务。 马克思认为无产者最无私，而到了社会主义共产主义没有了私人财产会更加无私。 这里马克思忘了或是疏忽了一件事，利己是世界上所有生物的本能，人类也概莫能外。 马克思主义要夺取了国家政权的共产党实行一党独裁的统治，理由是共产党是最先进的党，是无产者的党，现在国家是无产者的国家有既定的前进目标，自然不允许其它势力和人来 搀合。 一党独裁可以导致党内的独裁而党内的独裁可以变成一党独裁。 人在利己本能的驱使下都想保住既得利益获取新利益，一党独裁可以让他们做到这一点。 为了巩固一党独裁体制又制定了许多限制自由的法律法令。 这引起了人们的极大不满，最终导致独裁党的垮台。 经济上社会主义国家一切生产资料归国家所有取消了竞争，造成劳动效率的下降，而劳动效率高和效率低的人拿一样的报酬趋使人们出工不出力。 至于共产主义社会各尽所能各取所需，在人的利己本性下几无实现的可能，人的天性是好逸恶劳，而且攀比心重，一个人工作量少了旁边的人工作量也会减少。 而任何东西都不会完全一样，挑好的拿是人的本性，人的欲望没有止境这也是天性。 共产主义社会东西也有一般，好，最好之分，譬如想吃苹果的人去拿苹果当然是挑好的拿，人人都这样自然不是每个人都能得到最好的，有人会想办法吃 一个拿两个另一个留在下次吃。 出现这种情况是很自然的，各个方面都出现这种情况马克思的共产主义各取所需的社会能存在吗?

马克思主义认为在社会主义阶段人们的觉悟就会有极大的提高，因为国家是穷人的国家政权是穷人的政权，可具讽刺意味的是带领社会主义国家向共产社会前进的独裁者的觉悟并 没有提高，为了保住自己的宝座，并不任人唯賢，甚至为了一已的私利不惜把整个国家投入一场大浩劫。 马克思主义依靠这些私欲遮天的独裁者带领国家走向平等自由无私博爱的社会岂不缘木求鱼? 不是这些独裁者属于另类而是人性使然，既然人性使然换哪个人上去都会如此，只是程度大小不同而已 。

马克思创造出了一个共产主义社会，但没有一人见过这个社会，能不能实现每个人都会存有疑虑，对此马克思有两大依据，其1是: 马克思认为事物都有自己的发展规律，不 以人的意志为转移，共产主义取代资本主义是社会发展的必然规律，其2，人类过去经历过共产社会即原始共产主义社会，所以再进入更高级的共产社会应该是顺理成章的事。 先说其1，事物都有自己的发展规律且不会按照人们的意志而转移，这句话没有错。 但是马克思主义凭什么断定按照社会发展规律，若干年后资本主义肯定会灭亡世界肯定会进入他们设计的共产社会而不会进入其它的社会形态,包括我们现在还不知道的和还没想到的社会 形态。 其2，原始社会的早期狩猎阶段应该出现过共产现象，扑获的动物要及时吃掉不能保存，到了农耕阶段收下的粮食可以储存慢慢吃，人们有了短时间的财富，以候慢 慢的财富的增多就有了私人财产，私人财产的出现是一个进步现象，试想如果多余出来的粮食还是放在一起属于公共的，谁也不会去仔细照看它，如果把它分给个人每 个人都会仔细的保护它。 所以当吃饱肚子还有多余的存在时就分给个人了。 再往后有了家庭就更是私人财产了，原始共产主义由于有了多余的财产而消亡，马克思的共产主义由于财产的增多而建立，这可能吗 ?

马克思的共产主义幻想就像一台永动机，各方面都设计的完美无缺可就是在一个小的关键的地方违背了自然规律，永动机就永远不能动弹共产主义就永远不能实现。 马克思晚年曾说过他不是一个马克思主义者，也许马克思发现了自己学说的鈕误，但又不忍心公开否定自己奋斗一生的成果，故做此暗示。

马克思主义认为经济基础决定上层建筑，消灭了私有制也就消除了私有制思想，马克思不知道人的利己天性才是私有制的基础。 马克思是一个思想家，理论家，法律学家，预言家但不是生理学家，出现认为人的天性可以改造这样的错误也就不足为奇了。

马克思主义的失败在于将人的利己天性视为上层建筑，认为只要经济基础改变利己的天性将会改变，而利己天性并非上层建筑，它是一切生物的生存基础是天生不可改变的，而竞争则 是利己天性的表现形式，利己和竞争是生物存在的两个必要条件，没有利己天性的生物是不可能来到世界上也不可能生存下去，竞争失败也将被淘汰。 中国有句古语'人不为己，天诅地灭'。 说的就是这个意思。 幻想消除竞争，改变人的利己天性来创造一个美满的社会，只能是竹篮子打水一场空。 但人毕竟是高级动物，人类通过道德教育和法律惩罚将人的利己天性控制在合理的范围内，使人类能够顺利向前发展。