give me a world you have taken the world i was tuesday
4K notes
·
View notes
The "Free Britney"-movement plus accompanying documentary etc. was crucial in making people rethink the way we view women in the public eye (as part of the general reevaluation of 90s and 2000s misogyny), which is a very very good thing (!), but the specific way in which that discourse has entered Swiftdom sometimes feels a bit ... revisionist? It is not done on purpose, but once in a while I see a post or TikTok screenshot that places Taylor firmly in the “child star” category – where she does belong! – and automatically assumes that she thus has faced all the obstacles of people like Britney or her Disney peers. And it is not on me to say whether or not she has or hasn’t, or – God forbid – whether or not she had it “easier” than them (whatever that would mean), but it irks me when people frame certain choices Taylor made solely as the doing of Big Publicist or Her Overbearing Parents. Those two parties surely played a part in shaping Taylor and her career, and certainly not always in a gentle way that really and truly only had Taylor’s best interests at heart, but Taylor has always been extremely aware of The Culture, the demands of people, what sells and doesn’t sell, and, most importantly: what you should never ever do in the public eye. In the beginning of her career she constantly mentions watching “Behind the Music” and analyzing why musicians failed. Her 2019 Billboard Woman of the Year speech consists entirely of her listing the demands of people and how she responded to them by contorting herself into a shape she herself didn’t recognize. We can all make jokes about Andrea or Paula telling Taylor to not put “I Can See You” on Speak Now, but the reality could very well be that 19-year-old Taylor Swift saw the way her colleagues were getting torn apart for daring to be sexual in public, and chose to spare herself that. (After all, when her manager Paula tried to push the “good virginial pure girl” image on a Taylor who did not want to be that anymore, Paula got fired.) And of course that still fucks you up!!! And it’s still fucking evil!!! But it is not the same as having your entire life dictated by somebody else – for better or for worse: part of what makes Taylor’s musings about fame so interesting is that she is very much saying “this is what you (the public) did to me”, but she is also always grappling with the “and this is how I reacted to it”. I also do not want to insinuate that Taylor was 100% free in her choices and had a smooth and easy ride (because that would be a big fat lie). But she has had a great sense of self-preservation and likely a good deal of autonomy from day one, and it feels strange to try and take that away from her.
35 notes
·
View notes
Making playlists n creating fake album covers for them my beloved
12 notes
·
View notes
looking for alternative titles for ttpd for an edit and i am taking suggestions in the replies n my inbox
8 notes
·
View notes
The "Free Britney"-movement plus accompanying documentary etc. was crucial in making people rethink the way we view women in the public eye (as part of the general reevaluation of 90s and 2000s misogyny), which is a very very good thing (!), but the specific way in which that discourse has entered Swiftdom sometimes feels a bit ... revisionist? It is not done on purpose, but once in a while I see a post or TikTok screenshot that places Taylor firmly in the “child star” category – where she does belong! – and automatically assumes that she thus has faced all the obstacles of people like Britney or her Disney peers. And it is not on me to say whether or not she has or hasn’t, or – God forbid – whether or not she had it “easier” than them (whatever that would mean), but it irks me when people frame certain choices Taylor made solely as the doing of Big Publicist or Her Overbearing Parents. Those two parties surely played a part in shaping Taylor and her career, and certainly not always in a gentle way that really and truly only had Taylor’s best interests at heart, but Taylor has always been extremely aware of The Culture, the demands of people, what sells and doesn’t sell, and, most importantly: what you should never ever do in the public eye. In the beginning of her career she constantly mentions watching “Behind the Music” and analyzing why musicians failed. Her 2019 Billboard Woman of the Year speech consists entirely of her listing the demands of people and how she responded to them by contorting herself into a shape she herself didn’t recognize. We can all make jokes about Andrea or Paula telling Taylor to not put “I Can See You” on Speak Now, but the reality could very well be that 19-year-old Taylor Swift saw the way her colleagues were getting torn apart for daring to be sexual in public, and chose to spare herself that. (After all, when her manager Paula tried to push the “good virginial pure girl” image on a Taylor who did not want to be that anymore, Paula got fired.) And of course that still fucks you up!!! And it’s still fucking evil!!! But it is not the same as having your entire life dictated by somebody else – for better or for worse: part of what makes Taylor’s musings about fame so interesting is that she is very much saying “this is what you (the public) did to me”, but she is also always grappling with the “and this is how I reacted to it”. I also do not want to insinuate that Taylor was 100% free in her choices and had a smooth and easy ride (because that would be a big fat lie). But she has had a great sense of self-preservation and likely a good deal of autonomy from day one, and it feels strange to try and take that away from her.
35 notes
·
View notes
Lauren Bacall, To Have and Have Not, 1944
81 notes
·
View notes
something...something about taylor swift being sold as a product her literal entire life. something about trying to make messy unpalatable art this time but it's still covered in a layer of artifice and acceptability because she can't escape it, i'm still getting ads for it on every platform, there was still a deeply capitalist and deeply swiftian album rollout. i don't intend this really as a criticism i think it's actually very impressive that she hasn't had a true public meltdown. but there's something freeing about the public meltdown, right? and she in all likelihood will never have that moment.
133 notes
·
View notes
i have been saying since day one that a bit of depth and texture would have done wonders for this album cover and once again i was right
77 notes
·
View notes
I’m gonna say something potentially controversial
204 notes
·
View notes
Taylor's 2011 interview with The New Yorker is so interesting in the context of Clara Bow...
"Swift is sometimes called a twenty-one-year-old 2.0—the girl next door, but with a superior talent set. She has an Oprah-like gift for emotional expressiveness. While many young stars have a programmed, slightly robotic affect, she radiates unjaded sincerity no matter how contrived the situation—press junkets, awards shows, meet and greets." ("Flesh and blood amongst war machines.")
"Swift has the pretty, but not aggressively sexy, look of a nineteen-thirties movie siren. She is tall and gangly, with porcelain skin, long butterscotch hair that seems crimped, as if from a time before curling irons, and smallish eyes that often look as if they were squinting. She loves to wear makeup, but it tends to resemble stage makeup: red lipstick, thick mascara. . . . She is in the midst of her second world tour, and every show begins with a moment in which she stands silently at the lip of the stage and listens to her fans scream. She tilts her head from side to side and appears to blink back tears—the expression, which is projected onto a pair of Jumbotron screens, is part Bambi, part Baby June." ("You look like Clara Bow.")
96 notes
·
View notes
“I used to sit in record labels trying to get a record deal when I was a little kid. And they’d say, ‘you know, you remind us of’ and then they’d name an artist, and then they’d kind of say something disparaging about her, ‘but you’re this, you’re so much better in this way or that way.’ And that’s how we teach women to see themselves, as like you could be the new replacement for this woman who’s done something great before you. I picked women who have done great things in the past and have been these archetypes of greatness in the entertainment industry. Clara Bow was the first ‘it girl.’ Stevie Nicks is an icon and an incredible example for anyone who wants to write songs and make music.”
— Taylor on Clara Bow
688 notes
·
View notes
"How to Go to Dinner with a Brother on Drugs", Natalie Diaz, When My Brother Was an Aztec
81 notes
·
View notes
i have been saying since day one that a bit of depth and texture would have done wonders for this album cover and once again i was right
77 notes
·
View notes
As for “Who’s Afraid of Little Old Me,” Swift revealed that she wrote the tune “alone, sitting at the piano in one of those moments when I felt bitter about just all the things we do to our artists as a society and as a culture.” “There’s a lot about this particular concept on ‘The Tortured Poets Department,'” she added. “What do we do to our writers, and our artists, and our creatives? We put them through hell. We watch what they create, then we judge it. We love to watch artists in pain, often to the point where I think sometimes as a society we provoke that pain and we just watch what happens.”
Taylor on “Who’s Afraid of Little Old Me” (Variety)
1K notes
·
View notes
No thoughts just this photo of Bruce Springsteen
454 notes
·
View notes
why is taylorpictures down .... Lawd
1 note
·
View note