Tumgik
archaeocommunologist · 10 hours
Text
download killing upload pain. instant thousand deaths to brain. motherboard on murder spree. blood computer victory.
65K notes · View notes
archaeocommunologist · 10 hours
Text
Secularist society that takes the cigarettes approach to religion and it's totally legal but all religious texts require a big sticker thst says "THERE IS NO EVIDENCE FOR GOD" or whatever. And at the start of every sermon you have to give a disclaimer thst you're making it all up. Etc. Kinda based
986 notes · View notes
archaeocommunologist · 10 hours
Text
Zionists really are so dumb and cynical. The settlers with guns are Jews, you moron. That's the joke. The "Jewish voices" are the specific voices of the specific Jews who went to a Palestinian home with guns for the purpose of evicting them. You don't even think before you call someone an antisemite, it's literally your go-to response, even if it makes no sense.
And the layers of irony are palpable. If a Palestinian family were to fight back against Jews with guns trying to evict them, you'd cry about pogroms. All that talk about "protecting your family" would evaporate. You fucking moron. You are beneath contempt.
Tumblr media
2K notes · View notes
archaeocommunologist · 11 hours
Text
This Zionist blog claims it's a place to "hear Jewish voices" and in this case the Jewish voices are saying "if you don't give us your house we're gonna kill your fucking kid."
Tumblr media
2K notes · View notes
archaeocommunologist · 12 hours
Text
Thank you for providing such a succinct example of the nonsequiturs Zionists and their apologists engage in. If I had a home in Jerusalem in 1948 (or, indeed, today) and a Jewish family evicted me from my home and moved themselves in, their indigeneity or lack thereof would be totally irrelevant. A group of people who move to an area, kill or displace the current inhabitants, and establish ethnically homogenous communities are settlers. That's what being a settler is.
If a large group of Choctaw people, with the support of a foreign government, started kicking people out of Mississippi and taking their homes, they would also be settlers. Indigeneity doesn't enter into it.
There's this fascinating exchange between homochadensistm and a young Lebanese-Palestinian. It's fascinating because, 1.) it does demonstrate that if you try to meet people where they are and talk to them like humans, you can create understanding but 2.) it also perfectly demonstrates that this kind of human connection is not sufficient as a basis of politics.
Several long reblogs into the thread, the Palestinian says "my grandfather had a house and an orange orchard, but Jewish settlers kicked him out and burned down the orchard." Homochad replies, "I'm so sorry that happened to your family, war is terrible! I'm not trying to convince you Israel is perfect, I'm just trying to convince you that we belong here like you do."
So... what, she just wants bygones to be bygones? What about the house and the orchard? Does Homochad (or any Zionist) think there should be consequences for that? Reparations?
Of course not. The settler always thinks the issue ought to be done and dusted, settled. That's why the settler can present herself as the reasonable one, on the side of peace. She believes that the violence which created her current position, while regrettable, is basically justified and is certainly not in need of repair.
The settler gets to stand on the stolen land, in the stolen house, looking out at the stolen garden and say, "can't we all just learn to live in peace and harmony? Why are you so hateful?"
49 notes · View notes
archaeocommunologist · 16 hours
Text
There's this fascinating exchange between homochadensistm and a young Lebanese-Palestinian. It's fascinating because, 1.) it does demonstrate that if you try to meet people where they are and talk to them like humans, you can create understanding but 2.) it also perfectly demonstrates that this kind of human connection is not sufficient as a basis of politics.
Several long reblogs into the thread, the Palestinian says "my grandfather had a house and an orange orchard, but Jewish settlers kicked him out and burned down the orchard." Homochad replies, "I'm so sorry that happened to your family, war is terrible! I'm not trying to convince you Israel is perfect, I'm just trying to convince you that we belong here like you do."
So... what, she just wants bygones to be bygones? What about the house and the orchard? Does Homochad (or any Zionist) think there should be consequences for that? Reparations?
Of course not. The settler always thinks the issue ought to be done and dusted, settled. That's why the settler can present herself as the reasonable one, on the side of peace. She believes that the violence which created her current position, while regrettable, is basically justified and is certainly not in need of repair.
The settler gets to stand on the stolen land, in the stolen house, looking out at the stolen garden and say, "can't we all just learn to live in peace and harmony? Why are you so hateful?"
49 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
what an artful form of apartheid apologia. people are lapping this shit up in the notes. Even if we set aside the titanic amount of weaponry and equipment created and built by engineers and chemists, all the mapping software that guides missiles and drones and planes created by computer scientists and geographers for a second (science that the state is very much interested in!), zionist apartheid policy, administrative policies, planning and logistics, urban planning documents, you name it - that all apparently just popped into existence one day. for someone claiming to be concerned about social science academics you sure are dismissing all of their hard work! but if you just frame every academic in Israel as a poor little individual victim being randomly attacked for no reason then it’s easy to hide what’s actually going on, which is academics as a group experiencing the harsh end of a boycott. they are being targeted specifically because they are an intellectual class of a colonial state whose genocide is being live-streamed to the world, but if you obfuscate the academy’s role in training, educating, and providing intellectual architecture for the bureaucratic class and institutions that make up state governments, then you can frame a principled pro-Palestinian position (boycotting Israel) as misguided, stupid, overzealous, ineffectual, and most importantly, detrimental to the cause of freeing Palestine, all of which is of course so obvious to everyone but Palestinian activists. this is naked concern-trolling for the zionist project of annihilating Palestine and it is no less disgusting than any other zionist cheering on the mass murder of children
4K notes · View notes
Text
people b saying things so definitively. like man i think it depends
41K notes · View notes
Text
god, remember the attempt to cancel roísín murphy? what an insane and self-sabotaging waste of time.
0 notes
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
James baldwin’s the artists struggle for identity. Btw.
20K notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Kraken - China Mieville | Our Wives Under the Sea - Julia Armfield
24 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
2K notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
9K notes · View notes
Text
if someone brought karl marx back to life the first thing I would do is have a shopping montage to get him modern outfits where I shake my head yes or no to the outfits he picks out but then after that we'd get down to serious business
24K notes · View notes
Text
"There are weeks when nothing happens and there are weeks when something happens" — Vladimir Lenin
6K notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
Informed Yemeni sources reveal to The Cradle that the US offered Sanaa – in exchange for its neutrality in the ongoing Gaza war – “an acknowledgment of its legitimacy.” This would involve severely reducing the role of the Saudi-backed Presidential Council led by Rashid al-Alimi and accelerating the signing of a roadmap with Riyadh and Abu Dhabi to end the aggression against Yemen. The sources further reveal that the Americans pledged to immediately release withheld Yemeni public sector salaries from the National Saudi Bank, lift the country’s siege entirely, reopen Sanaa Airport, ease restrictions on the port of Hodeidah, and facilitate a comprehensive prisoner exchange agreement with all involved parties. In terms of reconstruction, the sources say: [Washington] pledged to repair the damages, remove foreign forces from all occupied Yemeni lands and islands, and remove Ansarallah from the State Department’s ‘terrorism list’ – as soon as they stop their attacks in support of Gaza. Despite these tempting offers, which have been the subject of negotiations between Sanaa and Riyadh for over two years, the Yemenis remained steadfast. Ansarallah leader Abdel Malik al-Houthi’s consistent position, as reiterated in his speeches, has been to continue operations as long as Israeli aggression against Gaza persists.
2K notes · View notes
Text
*eminem voice* *falls into a hole in a sewer grate before saying anything*
17K notes · View notes